similar to: recommendation?

I maintain a web application frozen to version Ruby 1.8.6 and RedCloth 3.0.4 Whenever I insert a newline followed by a white space, SuperRedCloth, wraps the text with <pre><code> tags. Say for example I write ############### Hi This is me ############### This piece of text gets translated to <p>Hi</p><pre><code>This is me</code></pre>

SuperRedCloth v1.160 and svn rev 163 don''t work the textile commands that specify table headers instead of table data. Here''s a simple test: require ''superredcloth'' w = "|_. a|_. b|_. c|\n|1|2|3|" h = SuperRedCloth.new(w).to_html puts h <table> <tr> <td>_. a</td>

Fellows of the cloth -- I''m writing code that subclasses RedCloth and emits styled text that is not HTML. For example, I''m going to be emitting RTF and other formats from Textile or Markdown. I''ve got it working quite well with plainclothed RedCloth, but I can''t seem to override any of the methods in SuperRedCloth. Here''s a sample:

Good day to the parliament of RedCloth followers gathered here. Grave matters at hand!! I''m personally quite unhappy with the state of RedCloth and am reluctant to release the code in the repository. I can''t say if the code works with any confidence because I can''t generate the (Poignant) Guide with the current RedCloth. I know some things are fixed, but I''m

I tried to install RedCloth-3.274 in jruby (trunk) but the install failed when RedCloth tried to build the C code using mkmf: I forget whether SuperRedcloth ever did build in JRuby?? I know Hpricot (which also uses ragel which can compile to Java code) works in JRuby -- with the patch here: https://code.whytheluckystiff.net/hpricot/ticket/131) I might be confusing the two ... FYI: If you

Hello, I am in a bit of a bind. I need to reliably parse mediawiki markup to html, and the only parser that I can find (mediacloth) has a lot to be desired, so I would like to extend something that works and parse mediawiki markup. My question to this list is should I start working on RedCloth or SuperRedCloth or is there a difference as far as extending them? Also does anyone know of a write up

Hello, I''m having some issues building r190 on Leopard (10.5.1): $ rake (in /Users/johan/temp/superredcloth) ragel superredcloth_scan.rl | rlgen-cd -G2 -o superredcloth_scan.c ragel superredcloth_inline.rl | rlgen-cd -G2 -o superredcloth_inline.c /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb checking for main() in -lc... yes creating Makefile make gcc -I.

Hello, I''m new to this list, so first of all, many thanks to RedCloth''s developers, it really helps me in many ruby apps :-) I post here because I''d like to have a clear view on "hard_breaks" related issues. I saw old references on the web and on the archives on this ML, I''d like a fresh view ! It seems that RedCloth 3.0.4 does not handle

New gems (source and win32): gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Use it like: SuperRedCloth.new("_huh?_").to_html Okay, getting close! A lot more tests are passing. There are still about 50 tests failing. Most of these are due to ol/ul list problems. Here''s what''s still broken: * Options (:hard_breaks, :filter_html, etc.) *

Textile 2.0.0: bc. This is within a block of code, so < and > should be *entities*. You can talk about a <p> tag if you wish and it will be properly escaped. <pre> You can''t make something actually <b>bold</b> within. </pre> Output: <pre><code>This is within a block of code, so &lt; and &gt; should be *entities*. You can

Okay, update: gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Or: http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/dist/superredcloth-1.160.tgz This one has better list, table and <notextile> support. I am close to releasing a SuperRedCloth on Rubyforge, so PLEASE! help me test this out by trying it on your personal wikis and blogs. Still to be done: * support for

I''m using" superredcloth (1.160) Using ''_.'' to indicate table headers doesn''t work: $ irb irb(main):001:0> require ''superredcloth'' => true irb(main):005:0> SuperRedCloth.new("|_. name |_. age |_. sex |\n| joan | 24 | f |\n| archie | 29 | m |\n| bella | 45 | f |\n").to_html =>

I was just wondering if I should upgrade to using SRC, as it sounds like it is going to be what becomes RedCloth 4. Reading the wiki and the announcements it''s supposedly under very active development, nearing release, and the breaking options are next on the list. Since there hadn''t been an update in a little while, I was curious where it stands now. The break handling in

1.) What is everyone''s preference on NCRs or character entities? Textile 2 uses decimal NCRs, so a less-than character becomes &#60; whereas RedCloth (3.04 and prior) used &lt;. What is your preference? It gets tough because &#39; (a straight single quote) doesn''t have a character entity equivalent. 2.) How do you feel about encoding characters like quotes

I''m having all kinds of fun trying to get HTML to work "properly" in SRC (mild sarcasm). I''m still working on the problem, but wanted to run it by the group. Currently, Textile2 lets you put in HTML as long as it''s in the same block (i.e. no double-returns). <ul> <li>You can put HTML code right in Textile.</li> <li>It will

Good news! SuperRedCloth is down to just five failing tests! I was down to 10 or so in mid-February but then I added test cases from "The official reference manual for Textile 2", which added 97 new tests, many of them failing. I''m happy to say, they''re almost all passing now. Four of these last five I just need to check with you on before I deviate from

Hi, I''m using RedCloth right now for some simple markup in a Rails project. It''s simple and easy - thanks for a great tool! I have a question about an apparent discrepancy between RedCloth and Textile, relating to newline characters. I''ve played with the "hard_breaks" feature and that seems to generate it''s own problems.. If I go onto the Textile

Who really uses strikethroughs?? This is one of the most common tripwires in RedCloth. You are the friend--the only friend--who has offered to help. Obviously em dashes. I died in -2006- wait, no, two-thousand-FIVE! Obviously strikethrough. I''m going on a trip - a long one - to the Virgin Islands. That''s got to be en dashes. Such a cheap, no-hassle, no-worry

Hello, I would like to install SuperRedCloth on my server, here is the entire log : gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing superredcloth: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb install superredcloth

Hello, I have the RedCloth 4.x gem installed on a new machine. I used to use the redcloth command line tool/executable ocassionally. Can anyone clarify if it''s still part of the RedCloth 4.x gem series? Thanks. PS: I checked the sources. And the executable source resides in bin [1]. However, checking the Rakefile that generates the gem package I can''t find any