Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Mocha, Stubba and RSpec"
2006 Sep 13
2
Problem with RSpec and Mocha/Stubba
I''ve recently upgraded to the latest versions of Mocha and RSpec
(0.3.2 and 0.6.3 respectively) and I''m no longer able to use Mocha/
Stubba with RSpec. Its actually only Stubba I''m interested in as I
use RSpec''s built-in mocking library.
I require stubba in my spec file but whenever I try and run my spec
it fails with the error:
Unintialized constant
2007 May 07
6
mock frameworks
Just curious - now that rspec (as of 0.9) let''s you choose your mock
framework, how many of you are actually using (or planning to use)
mocha or flexmock?
Anybody planning to use any other mock framework besides rspec, mocha
or flexmock?
Thanks,
David
2006 Sep 11
1
Aliasing type method in Mocha
Hi, (Mocha and Stubba are great, btw.)
Is there any way to alias the call to .type in Mocha? The issue is
that AR effectively aliases the normal type method for the Column
class (for whatever Adapter.) My code is reflecting on the adapter
methods to iterate over the columns in a particular model. This makes
it hard to write test code that stubs out columns and mocks my models.
E.g.
cols =
2007 Nov 04
3
Returning the mock associated with an expectation.
I was reading through the FlexMock docs and noticed the expectation
method .mock, which returns the original mock associated with an
expectation.
It looks really handy for writing nice all-in-one mocks like:
mock_user = mock(''User'').expects(:first_name).returns(''Jonah'').mock
So I started playing around with mocha and found I could actually
already do this!
2006 Sep 18
2
Mocha + Selenium-on-rails loading problem ?
Hello All,
I need to stub two class methods before a selenium call.
The .rsel is :
require ''mocha''
SalesConfigWork.stubs(:load_work_data)
SalesConfigWork.stubs(:delete_work_data)
setup :fixtures => :sales_config_works
open "/"
The Selenium test runner result is :
undefined method `stubs'' for SalesConfigWork:Class
Extracted source (around line *#0*):
2006 Nov 21
5
stubbing in development environment
Hi guys.
Quite happy with mocha for testing. It''s been a bit of an eye opener
for me, and I expect to begin using it heavily.
One other thing I''d like to do is stub out particular class methods in
development. Is there a way I can do this with mocha?
Jason
2006 Aug 17
1
expectations on stubs (stubba) or mock methods on existing classes?
Hello,
First, thanks for releasing Mocha. As someone who''s been practicing
TDD much longer than I''ve been using Rails, one of my biggest
complaints has always been the fact that the "Unit" tests are more
like intefration tests because of how tightly coupled the domain model
is when using ActiveRecord. Stubba looks like it could really help
aleviate this problem.
The
2007 Mar 12
10
using mocha with rspec
Hi folks.
I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The
thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple
require ''mocha'' would set me up.
Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in
anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious.
Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up
2007 Apr 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:24
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class
destroys subsequent test cases
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #5892, was opened at 2006-09-25 07:49
You can respond by visiting:
2006 Dec 14
1
Patch: make rdoc of lib/mocha/object.rb instead of lib/stubba/object.rb
Index: Rakefile
===================================================================
--- Rakefile (revision 73)
+++ Rakefile (working copy)
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
task.rdoc_dir = ''doc''
task.template = "html_with_google_analytics"
task.options << "--line-numbers" << "--inline-source"
-
2006 Sep 25
3
Problem stubbing instances referred to by constants
Hi James,
An instance retains its mocha between tests if that instance is
pointed to by a constant. The simplest failing test is something like
(add as a new file in mocha/test)..
#--code--
require File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "test_helper")
require ''stubba''
class WemStubbaTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
Arr = [1, 2, 3]
def test_a
2006 Oct 13
6
If I stub do I have to mock as well?
Hi, I''m new to mocha and stubba but eager to learn. I have a rails
functional test in which I would like to stub an instance method of
particular class to always return true. I tried the following:
def test_post_checkout
Order.any_instance.stubs(:successful?).returns(true)
post :checkout
assert_response :redirect
assert_equal "Checkout was successful.",
2006 Sep 11
4
Using rspec and mocha
I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However
I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to
Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a
mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of
their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework
and Mocha do to
2006 Sep 11
4
Using rspec and mocha
I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However
I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to
Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a
mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of
their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework
and Mocha do to
2006 Sep 08
1
A quick guide to Mocha
Hello :)
Having just gone through the (admittedly simple) API of Mocha to learn
how it works, I wrote a quick guide (190 lines) to help others get up to
speed. I''ve attached it as RDOC and as HTML.
It is a first draft - please help me improve by giving feedback !
Contents :
Overview - Quick overview of Mocha
Unit testing, mock object and stubs - Very quick introduction to mock
2006 Sep 03
2
Fwd: Dealing with exec?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kevin Clark <kevin.clark at gmail.com>
Date: 01-Sep-2006 20:31
Subject: Dealing with exec?
To: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com>
Hey James,
Sorry to bug you. I was curious how you''d handle a call to exec in a
method you were testing. Kernel.stubs(:exec)... doesn''t seem to work
but I''m not sure where else an
2007 Feb 05
10
how does Mocha compare in terms of classical vs mock-based testing, and stubbing???
Hi guys,
I''ve just been reading Martin Fowler''s article re mock versus
stubbing<http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html>where
he compares traditional TDD testing techniques with mock based
testing. I''d be interested in comments from a ruby on rails perspective in
terms of this and Mocha? For example:
a) Do you see Mocha as a robust way to test Ruby
2006 Aug 15
3
Testing deleting files
In unit or functional test, is there a way to check that a file has been
deleted?
It seems that running the test does not really execute deleting files, which
is good because I don''t want it to actually delete the files. But can I
check that the deletion should have been performed in test environment?
thanks,
- reynard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2006 Aug 14
14
A mock which extends rather than replaces a class?
While running tests, we would like to instrument some of the classes
under test. We still want the classes to do exactly what they currently
do, but we would like them to do more when running in the test
environment.
Clearly we can (and currently do) just extend the objects "on the fly"
where necessary, but this is a bit messy - we''d like some centralised
way to always
2006 Oct 06
8
Expecting calls with two different parameters
Hello,
I''ve just started using Mocha in the tests for my Rails app, and I''ve
run across an issue with mocking a method that should be called with
different parameters.
How would I setup a mock that expects that a method will be called
once with no paramaters, and a second time with a parameter? I''d be
tempted to shortcut and just do something like