similar to: public SVN dead?

This works: class X def X.initialize( stuff ) end end X.initialize("bla") However stubbing it doesn,t: require ''test/unit'' require ''stubba'' class X def X.initialize( stuff ) end end class XTest < Test::Unit::TestCase def test_ X.stubs(:initialize).with("bla")

Let''s say that I have a procedure that: * gets the number of bytes to write into some file * and returns the number of successfully written bytes def save( text, len ) This procedure is being used all over the place especially inside the method "process" which I want to test. Thus in order not to polute my filesystem I stub the "save" procedure. But of course in

Hello James, am trying to package Mocha for Debian and have noticed, that both the tarball and the zip are missing the examples/ directory. *t ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Sorry for the spam avalanche - there''s an init.rb file in the trunc SVN branch too, which I''m not so sure about whether to include it or not in the Debian package... *t ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

I have everything installed via Darwin ports. When I try to do a "script/plugin install engines" in a freshly created rails app I get the following: Macintosh:~/My Web Sites/nckapool bill$ script/plugin install engines svn: PROPFIND request failed on ''/rails/plugins'' svn: PROPFIND of ''/rails/plugins'': 403 Forbidden (http:// svn.protocool.com)

Following the advice here I''ve been trying to get subversion installed and working from my virtual dedicated server this weekend. I believe everything is installed properly, and that all that''s left is to get the apache httpd.conf file set up correctly. to talk to my server with my client I''m using the path: http://svn.mylittlecorneroftheinternet.com/svn/repos/ error

Folks- With Rails 2.0.2, I''m seeing mocha failures where they did not fail with Rails 2.0.1 test_set_to_process_fail_in_transaction(FileRecordTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `ord'' for 63:Fixnum /home/wolpert/svn/rubylms/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/class_method.rb:45:in `hidden_method''

svn co http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/trunk svn: PROPFIND request failed on ''/svn/rails/trunk'' svn: PROPFIND of ''/svn/rails/trunk'': Could not resolve hostname `dev.rubyonrails .org'': The requested name is valid and was found in the database, but it does no t have the correct associated data being resolved for. (http://dev.rubyonrails .org) --

Dear r-devel, Sorry to trouble the list with this, but I've been beating my head against the wall trying to figure out what's wrong. When I try to connect to the R SVN server, I get the following message: (sly at cornas):~/src/R$ svn co https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk r-devel svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/R/trunk' svn: PROPFIND of '/R/trunk': SSL negotiation

I happened to mix ryan bates'' authentication scaffold with rspec_scaffold on a demo project. and ran into the problem of mixing mock frameworks...ryan uses mocha. So, as a learning experience, I choose to redo ryan''s tests without mocha but ran into a strange problem with tests of the User model. With debugging you can see.... If you run just the user_spec.rb file, everything

Hi, I am running Samba 2.2.1 on a Redhat 7.2 machine and have the following in smb.conf: workgroup = AGS_NT security = domain password server = mocha bigblue encrypt passwords = yes everything else is default. "mocha" is the PDC and is a NT4 box". The machine has joined the domain with "smbpasswd -j AGS_NT". When using "smbpasswd

When trying to run Chris samples I get error: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mocha-0.3.2/lib/smart_test_case.rb:3: uninitialized constant Test (NameError) from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mocha-0.3.2/lib/mocha.rb:1 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:33:in

On my current project I needed to create a stub that responded correctly to the id message. Here''s the change I put into my copy of head. Index: lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb =================================================================== --- lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (revision 1114) +++ lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (working copy) @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ method_names =

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to

I recently needed the behavior of my object to change on subsequent method calls so I added the syntax above. Here''s the diff of changes I made: Index: test/mocha/expectation_test.rb =================================================================== --- test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (revision 854) +++ test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (working copy) @@ -95,6 +95,12 @@

Hi all, We just updated to the latest version of Mocha and now we''re seeing a lot of odd test failures. If this isn''t the appropriate place for a question like this, please let me know. Say I have code like this in a controller: DataMonitor.toggle_notification! And I mock it like this: DataMonitor.any_instance.stubs(:toggle_notification!) This would work fine with Mocha

Hi Antonio, My environment is OS X 10.4.8. Thanks a lot for looking into the problem. Please let me know if I can do anything to help. I have had problems previously with tar including Mac resource fork files. Could this be what is causing your problem? James. On 24 Jul 2007, at 20:42, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi James, > > First of all, thanks for mocha, it''s a really

Hi, I''ve been a happy user of Mocha for a while now. My current project is by far the most complicated I''ve ever worked on and Mocha has made testing it much easier than it would otherwise be. So, I was highly disturbed to come in this morning, run svn up and find that something in today''s update broke lots of my tests. I use Mocha as a Rails plugin under

Hello :) Having just gone through the (admittedly simple) API of Mocha to learn how it works, I wrote a quick guide (190 lines) to help others get up to speed. I''ve attached it as RDOC and as HTML. It is a first draft - please help me improve by giving feedback ! Contents : Overview - Quick overview of Mocha Unit testing, mock object and stubs - Very quick introduction to mock