similar to: SslRequirements plugin and mocha

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "SslRequirements plugin and mocha"

2006 Oct 26
2
Mocha and SimplyHelpful
Hi, I''m getting a conflict between the Mocha plugin and the Rails SimplyHelpful plugin. For some reason the dom_id method from SimplyHelpful is not being found in my views when the Mocha plugin is installed. The dom_id method if used in the controller works properly. This is the error I get when running the tests: 1) Error: test_truth(HmmControllerTest):
2006 Sep 18
2
Mocha + Selenium-on-rails loading problem ?
Hello All, I need to stub two class methods before a selenium call. The .rsel is : require ''mocha'' SalesConfigWork.stubs(:load_work_data) SalesConfigWork.stubs(:delete_work_data) setup :fixtures => :sales_config_works open "/" The Selenium test runner result is : undefined method `stubs'' for SalesConfigWork:Class Extracted source (around line *#0*):
2009 Jun 13
2
removing Mocha; 'spec spec' fails but the specific model file passes
I happened to mix ryan bates'' authentication scaffold with rspec_scaffold on a demo project. and ran into the problem of mixing mock frameworks...ryan uses mocha. So, as a learning experience, I choose to redo ryan''s tests without mocha but ran into a strange problem with tests of the User model. With debugging you can see.... If you run just the user_spec.rb file, everything
2006 Sep 11
4
Using rspec and mocha
I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to
2006 Sep 11
4
Using rspec and mocha
I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to
2007 Mar 12
10
using mocha with rspec
Hi folks. I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple require ''mocha'' would set me up. Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious. Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up
2008 Jun 12
2
SslRequirement Problem
Hello everyone, I''m pretty new to the RoR''s thing and am having a problem setting up SslRequirement plugin. I have installed the SslRequirement plugin and added it to my application_controller.rb with include SslRequirement However, when I try and do "ssl_required :process_payment" I get the following error: undefined method `ssl_required'' for
2007 Oct 13
3
Endless Redirects with Ssl_Requirement
I''m running an application on mongrel with apache 2.2.3. SSL works fine when I enter an https manually. But when I use the plugin, I get an endless redirect. Got the same error when I tried running the following simplified version of SslRequirement from within an action: unless request.ssl? redirect_to "https://#{request.host}/#{request.uri}" end So there must be a
2007 Jun 08
4
Mocha 0.5 released
* Hamcrest-style parameter matchers * Values returned and exceptions raised on consecutive invocations * Yields on consecutive invocations * Multiple yields on single invocation * Invocation dispatch fixed * Deprecated returning result of a Proc -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org
2007 Jul 24
3
mocha tarballs don''t uncompress cleanly
Hi Antonio, My environment is OS X 10.4.8. Thanks a lot for looking into the problem. Please let me know if I can do anything to help. I have had problems previously with tar including Mac resource fork files. Could this be what is causing your problem? James. On 24 Jul 2007, at 20:42, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi James, > > First of all, thanks for mocha, it''s a really
2010 Nov 12
2
pending tests fail when I switch to mock_with :mocha
First of all, please direct me into how better to search existing threads in this mailing list. Ok to my rspec 2.0.1 mocha 0.9.8 issue: given a controller test before do subject.expects(:authenticate).once end it "should bla bla" do pending "PENDING, shouldn''t fail?" end with config.mock_with :rspec it''s ok: pending, but with
2007 Dec 21
5
Mocha and rails 2.0.2?
Folks- With Rails 2.0.2, I''m seeing mocha failures where they did not fail with Rails 2.0.1 test_set_to_process_fail_in_transaction(FileRecordTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `ord'' for 63:Fixnum /home/wolpert/svn/rubylms/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/class_method.rb:45:in `hidden_method''
2006 Oct 25
5
Mocha, Stubba and RSpec
Hi, I''ve been reading with interest the threads trying to integrate Mocha and Stubba with RSpec. So far, I''ve made the two changes in spec_helper.rb suggested, but discovered another one that neither of the archives mentions: If you use traditional mocking: object = mock or the stub shortcut : object = stub(:method => :result), you run into namespace conflicts with
2006 Oct 18
1
New to Mocha
Hi all I am new to Mocha. I am trying to use it for my pet rails project. I seem to be getting loads of errors when I add mocha as a plugin. It seems to be conflicting with TinyMCE plugin http://johnwulff.com/ articles/2006/05/31/tinymce-with-ruby-on-rails I am getting the following errors ActionView::TemplateError: undefined method `using_tiny_mce?'' for
2006 Mar 30
4
SSL Requirement plugin
Is there any way to have the plugin require SSL to be used for all actions in a controller and just specify the ones you dont want to require SSL using ssl_allowed? class ApplicationController < ActiveRecord::Base include SslRequirement ssl_required *.* Many thanks. Also I could of course combine this with local.request? so that when developing locally http is allowed, but
2006 Sep 13
2
Problem with RSpec and Mocha/Stubba
I''ve recently upgraded to the latest versions of Mocha and RSpec (0.3.2 and 0.6.3 respectively) and I''m no longer able to use Mocha/ Stubba with RSpec. Its actually only Stubba I''m interested in as I use RSpec''s built-in mocking library. I require stubba in my spec file but whenever I try and run my spec it fails with the error: Unintialized constant
2007 Apr 12
15
Preview of Latest Mocha Changes
I''ve finally managed to find some time to do some serious work on Mocha. There are some code snippets on my blog (http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/12/preview-of-latest-mocha-changes) showing the new functionality available in trunk (revision 128). I don''t don''t know how many people out there are using trunk, but it would be great to get some feedback on these
2009 Sep 09
3
[Rspec] Using Mocha results in uninitialized constant, using a 'fix' breaks RSpec output
After installation of Mocha (0.9.7), running "script/spec spec" results in a "`const_missing'': uninitialized constant Test::Unit::TestResult::TestResultFailureSupport (NameError)" error. (As shown here; http://codepad.org/mTqztjwt ) I''m running Ruby 1.8.6 with Rails 2.3.4 on Windows, rspec (-rails) 1.2.8 (1.2.7.1), Test::Unit 2.0.3 As suggested roughly on
2007 Sep 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 7 Sep 2007 22:43 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #13763, was opened at 2007-09-07 17:43 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Apr 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:24 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #5892, was opened at 2006-09-25 07:49 You can respond by visiting: