similar to: asign variables in a "for" loop

Dear R-Help members, I am using Simon Wood`s mgcv package version1.7-22and R version 3.0.0 (2013-04-03) for fitting a GAM-Model to the LIDAR Data contained in the "SemiPar" package. Here is the code for fitting the model and for plotting the result: data("lidar") attach(lidar) ### # mgcv fitting ### gam_fit <- gam(logratio ~ s(range, k = 40, bs = "cr"), gamma

Dear All- I have a dataset that is comprised of the following: doy yr mon day hr hgt1 hgt2 hgt3 co21 co22 co23 sig1 sig2 sig3 dif flag 244.02083 2005 09 01 00 2.6 9.5 17.8 375.665 373.737 373.227 3.698 1.107 0.963 -0.509 PRE 244.0625 2005 09 01 01 2.6 9.5 17.8 393.66 384.773 379.466 15.336 11.033 5.76 -5.307 PRE 244.10417 2005 09 01 02 2.6 9.5 17.8 411.162 397.866 387.755 6.835 5.61 6.728

Dear All, I was wondering if it is possible to generate a regression summary (it does not matter at this stage if from an lm or for example a glm estimate) in which to obtain the joint significance of a set of regressors? Examples could be looking at the joint significance level of a polynomial, or of a set of exogenous variables of which is of interest the linear combination suggested by the

This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new ODR linkage types. This means that many more functions are being considered by the inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" functions defined in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good and bad) in the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often

Dear All: In the attached file, I have 3 group patients, and there are 5 in each group (the groups are decided by the prefix of the idno). I want draw a repeat measurement comparison figure. My goal is to list 5 patients from same group on one horizontal line. But xyplot sounds pick them randomly (or I was confused?). Could you please help me modify the following code to accomplish this?

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".