similar to: Feature request... I think...

Folks- With Rails 2.0.2, I''m seeing mocha failures where they did not fail with Rails 2.0.1 test_set_to_process_fail_in_transaction(FileRecordTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `ord'' for 63:Fixnum /home/wolpert/svn/rubylms/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/class_method.rb:45:in `hidden_method''

We''re encountering a failure with Mocha 0.5.6. We had this expectation: game_version.expects(:attributes=).with(:game_file => kind_of(GameFile), :game_id => @game.id) This expectation was passing with 0.5.5, but fails with 0.5.6. I added this test to parameter_matcher_acceptance_test.rb, which passes in 0.5.5 and fails in 0.5.6 def test_should_match_nested_parameters

Has anybody been using Mocha trunk over the last month or two? I''ve done quite a bit of internal refactoring and wondered whether anyone had any problems. There are also a bunch of new features e.g. states, sequences, extra parameter matchers & configurable warnings, but these are not documented in the on-line rdoc. I wondered if anyone has been looking at the rdoc in trunk and

Hi folks. So I''m using mocha on a ruby project, and I really like it. One thing I''ve noticed is that it can be a bit "surprising" when I''m mocking methods that don''t exist on an object, and I think there''s an easyish fix. At the moment, you use sheep = mock() to create a mock sheep. What I''d like to do is something like sheep =

Hello to everyone, I have a problem that is giving me a headache, and trying to do a project in Ruby on Rails and I need to connect with a Data Base that is en Postgres, the truth is that I didn’t think that it was so hard to connect a DB with postgres because I was working with Msyql and everything was easy. This are the thinks that I have install in my computer. 1. Debian GNU/Linux, kernel

I''ve finally managed to find some time to do some serious work on Mocha. There are some code snippets on my blog (http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/12/preview-of-latest-mocha-changes) showing the new functionality available in trunk (revision 128). I don''t don''t know how many people out there are using trunk, but it would be great to get some feedback on these

Apologies in advance for a kind of long question: I've written an application called changedfiles (http://www.bangstate.com/software.html#changedfiles), which consists of two parts: a linux kernel module that reports all file operations to a device special, and a userspace daemon which can take arbitray shell action on files matching regexp rules specified in a config file. E.G.,

This is in CVS, FWIW (that is, not much since the odds of 1.3.13 being released are epsilon close to nil). On Wednesday, 02 July 2003 at 11:38, Ned Wolpert wrote: > Folks, > I email abit ago about using 1.3.12 in my environment, and fixing a > dead-lock problem. Since 1.3.12 is 'obsolete', not supported, and GPL > I'm provided a patch to the mailing list of my

Folks- First, let me submit a disclaimer... I know 1.3.12 is unsupported. However, since icecast2 isn't officially released, I'm abit SOL anyways, so I'm currently trying to debug it and will release a patch when I'm done. (Which I'm doing since the code is GPL and I want to contribute... if no one cares, let me know and I'll stop updating the list with what i find)

Hi, R team. I'm trying to build a dll from a c program to be invoked within R using the .C() functionality. Everything works like a charm on my Linux (Centos 5) (also 2.6.2) machines--- but under windows (Vista Ultimate) upon running (in either the windows 'Cmd' command window or a Bash window) the command Rcmd SHLIB myfun.c I receive the error: Can't locate R/Utils.pm in

I''m a big fan of stubbing Time.now so it returns a known value. I used to be able to use stubba and say: @time_now = Time.parse("Jan 1 2001") Time.stubs(:now).returns(lambda{@time_now}) However, something in trunk broke that. Fine, rspec''s got its own stubbing lib now, so I tried switching to that: @time_now = Time.parse("Jan 1 2001")

Hi All, This is my first post ... I *HAD* been trying to get RHEL AS 4 onto this Dell PE 6400/700, but it just wouldn't go without some weird tweaking. I am VERY happy to say that CentOS 4.4 installed without a hitch! NICELY done folks! The only real issue for me is that the machine fails to reboot or shutdown correctly. It requires physical interaction with the power switch,

Hi guys, Am having a problem. I have this def in my index controller that works like this: def do_something $a = variable1 $b = variable2 $c = variable3 $d = ""<script language=\"Javascript\"> \n new Insertion.Bottom(''#{$c}'', ''#{$a} - #{$b}''); \n </script>" $trigger = "1" render(:partial =>

Considering the python code: for k, v in d.items(): do_something(k); do_something_else(v) I have the following for R: for (i in c(1:length(d))) { do_something(names(d[i])); do_something_else(d[[i]]) } This does not seem seems idiomatic. What is the best way of doing the same with R? Thanks. Luis

Hi, I have a general question on LoopUnswtich pass. Consider the following IR snippet: define i32 @test(i1 %cond) { br label %loop_begin loop_begin: br i1 %cond, label %loop_body, label %loop_exit loop_body: br label %do_something do_something: call void @some_func() noreturn nounwind br label %loop_begin loop_exit: ret i32 0 } declare void @some_func() noreturn After running

This drives me insane on a regular basis. How does one mock system(''blah'') or `blah` ? Adding expectations on Kernel doesn''t do it. Adding expectations on Object just makes me sad: Object.any_instance.expects(:system).with(''ls'') # => #<Mock:0x12b584e>.system(''ls'') - expected calls: 0, actual calls: 1 And this really

Hi guys, I''ve just been reading Martin Fowler''s article re mock versus stubbing<http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html>where he compares traditional TDD testing techniques with mock based testing. I''d be interested in comments from a ruby on rails perspective in terms of this and Mocha? For example: a) Do you see Mocha as a robust way to test Ruby

Hi, I''ve been reading with interest the threads trying to integrate Mocha and Stubba with RSpec. So far, I''ve made the two changes in spec_helper.rb suggested, but discovered another one that neither of the archives mentions: If you use traditional mocking: object = mock or the stub shortcut : object = stub(:method => :result), you run into namespace conflicts with

Hi folks. I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple require ''mocha'' would set me up. Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious. Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up

Hello :) Having just gone through the (admittedly simple) API of Mocha to learn how it works, I wrote a quick guide (190 lines) to help others get up to speed. I''ve attached it as RDOC and as HTML. It is a first draft - please help me improve by giving feedback ! Contents : Overview - Quick overview of Mocha Unit testing, mock object and stubs - Very quick introduction to mock