similar to: [patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

Hi, I use rsync 3.0.4 on two opensuse 11 machines. Every night, a big tree of machine A is synced to machine B. These machines are samba PDC and BDC, users and groups are ldap-based, and ACLs are heavily used. There are about 2.8 million files and dirs, 2.2 terabytes of data, and a complete ACL list produced with getfacl has some 600 megabytes. I've just noticed that ACLs get partially

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've compiled rsync 3.0.3 on OSX 10.4 PPC via the plain jane ./configure; make method (no patches). The resulting binary has then been moved to /usr/local/bin/rsync3 and copied to a OSX 10.5.4 Intel client machine as rsync3. I then run the following command: rsync3 -vvv -e ssh -avAX --progress --delete -

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8130 Summary: ACL and link-dest do not work together Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: az9901 at gmail.com

I've found an error: ACLs are not properly preserved when a file is moved from Solaris to a 2.6 Linux (I'm testing using CentOS 4 update 3 plus updates). This is using 2.6.8 built with the acl patch on both platforms. The file on the source Solaris machine: [truffle:/opt]# getfacl /xxx/x # file: /xxx/x # owner: root # group: other user::rw- user:httpd:r-x #effective:r--

Hi, I got the following bug report on the Debian rsync which has the ACL patch applied: On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Bryan Gartner wrote: > > When using the rltvz options to mirror files from a remote server, these > kinds of issues are reported: > > default_perms_for_dir: sys_acl_get_file(wallpaper, SMB_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT): > Function not implemented, falling back on umask >

SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.3 hits, 5 required) SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points) From: does not include a real name

afgewende tpeng beconovich`quick-draw procmail Worry on the safety of my credit card details is never on again cause I know my card details and order details are secure. The sav""i"-"ngs are also a"."mazing for a person who needs to take certain me"`"ds daily. Freddo D. --SD Clearly my income is not high enough for me to take certain

Hi. I'm attempting to compile rsync 2.6.9 with both the acls & xattr patches on an MacBook pro (ie: Intel processor), with the latest Apple Developer Tools. While this is OS X client, I've enabled acls via "sudo /usr/bin/fsaclctl -p / -e" and rebooted, prior to attempting to compile rsync. Is there something else inherent in OS X Server perhaps, that I'm still