Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[Bug 8979] New: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks"
2008 Mar 26
1
rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion
Wayne,
I have this bug in redhat bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439074
Summary: rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion
Is it ok to pass this kind of bug directly upstream filing a new bug in
bugzilla and linking the fedora bug ?
(There is also a reproducer there)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
2008 Apr 26
1
Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive.
Hi Wayne,
I just got this bug report about rsync 3.0.2 reproducibly crashing,
together with a backtrace and a patch; very helpful :-)
(Please preserve 477931-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC so that you
response is archived in the Debian BTS, thanks.)
Paul Slootman
On Fri 25 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Subject: Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive.
> From:
2010 Jun 15
3
about rsyncing of block devices
Hiya,
I can see it's a regular subject on this list.
I, like others wanted to use rsync to synchronise two block
devices (as it happens one lvm volume and one nbd device served
by qemu-img on a remote host from a qcow2 disk image so that I
can keep the old versions)
As I couldn't find any report of it being done successfully,
I'm just sharing my findings as it might benefit others.
2013 Jul 19
2
[Bug 10037] New: do_mknod fails to create socket file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037
Summary: do_mknod fails to create socket file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at gmail.com
2015 Sep 09
2
large rsync fails with assertion error
rsyncing a tree of perhaps 30M files, getting this:
rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
then a bit more output and
2008 Mar 11
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5318] New: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5318
Summary: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2007 Dec 13
3
rsync 3.00pre6 segfault in add_dirs_to_tree
Hi All
I run rsync in an automated environment and it sometime will crash and
leave a core dump file. from core dump, gdb shows that
gdb) bt
#0 add_dirs_to_tree (parent_ndx=-1, from_flist=0x56c590, dir_cnt=1) at
flist.c:1422
#1 0x0000000000409eab in send_file_list (f=16, argc=-1, argv=0x56c238)
at flist.c:2068
#2 0x0000000000419052 in client_run (f_in=16, f_out=16, pid=-1, argc=1,
2007 Jan 26
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4357] New: Missing bounds checking in send_files could lead crash
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4357
Summary: Missing bounds checking in send_files could lead crash
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2008 Oct 14
1
assert problem
rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd .
....
lots of stuff works, but then....
....
dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz
1306806 100% 3.34MB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734)
dvd/setdir/xlibs/
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gst_plugins_base-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
2014 Dec 01
2
[Bug 10977] New: Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability (rsync 3.1.1 tested)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10977
Bug ID: 10977
Summary: Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability (rsync
3.1.1 tested)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: core
2007 Nov 12
1
rsync 3.0.0 pre5 + hard link preversation trigger assert
I've setup rsync 3.0.0 pre5 on distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr (rsync server)
and upload the same into mandriva cooker (development distribution).
Someone reported this failure:
rsync -auvPH --delete
--exclude-from="/home/rfox/exclude.txt"
distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr::mandrivalinux/devel/cooker/i586/ .
receiving incremental file list
rsync: hlink.c:253: check_prior: Assertion
2014 Nov 14
6
[Bug 10936] New: Rsync path hijacking attack vulnerability
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10936
Bug ID: 10936
Summary: Rsync path hijacking attack vulnerability
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2023 Feb 17
1
[feature request?]: Show progress only for big files
Hi,
I've read through the rsync manpage, this mailing list, asked Google and
studied lots of posts on stackexchange.com (stackoverflow,
superuser...), askubuntu.com and some others, concerning rsync's
capabilities of showing progress information. But all I've found was
what I already knew: --progress (or -P) shows a progress information for
*every* file transmitted, --info=progress2
2008 Mar 19
0
[PATCH] Unsnarl missing_below/dry_run logic.
The generator can skip a directory's contents altogether due to
--ignore-non-existing, a daemon exclude, or a mkdir failure. On a --dry-run,
the generator can also note the missingness of a directory while still scanning
its contents. These two scenarios were conflated using a single set of
missing_below/missing_dir variables in combination with transient increments in
dry_run; this caused
2008 Mar 20
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5343] New: rsync does nothing after first time
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5343
Summary: rsync does nothing after first time
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: IA64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: rolmol@broadpark.no
2009 Jul 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6542] New: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542
Summary: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >=
hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
2011 Dec 16
5
[Bug 8666] New: --debug=all9 fail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666
Summary: --debug=all9 fail
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au
QAContact: rsync-qa at
2015 Sep 09
0
large rsync fails with assertion error
Ok I found a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542
and it says fixed by upgrade. I found a way to upgrade. Using:
rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31
on receiving side that issues the rsync command, and
rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31
on the remote sending side.
Im still getting the same thing:
rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >=
2018 Jul 12
1
[Bug 13526] New: Hard link creation time
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13526
Bug ID: 13526
Summary: Hard link creation time
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: