similar to: [Bug 8979] New: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[Bug 8979] New: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks"

2008 Mar 26
1
rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion
Wayne, I have this bug in redhat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439074 Summary: rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion Is it ok to pass this kind of bug directly upstream filing a new bug in bugzilla and linking the fedora bug ? (There is also a reproducer there) Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
2008 Apr 26
1
Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive.
Hi Wayne, I just got this bug report about rsync 3.0.2 reproducibly crashing, together with a backtrace and a patch; very helpful :-) (Please preserve 477931-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC so that you response is archived in the Debian BTS, thanks.) Paul Slootman On Fri 25 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Subject: Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive. > From:
2010 Jun 15
3
about rsyncing of block devices
Hiya, I can see it's a regular subject on this list. I, like others wanted to use rsync to synchronise two block devices (as it happens one lvm volume and one nbd device served by qemu-img on a remote host from a qcow2 disk image so that I can keep the old versions) As I couldn't find any report of it being done successfully, I'm just sharing my findings as it might benefit others.
2013 Jul 19
2
[Bug 10037] New: do_mknod fails to create socket file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 Summary: do_mknod fails to create socket file Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at gmail.com
2015 Sep 09
2
large rsync fails with assertion error
rsyncing a tree of perhaps 30M files, getting this: rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. then a bit more output and
2008 Mar 11
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5318] New: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5318 Summary: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2007 Dec 13
3
rsync 3.00pre6 segfault in add_dirs_to_tree
Hi All I run rsync in an automated environment and it sometime will crash and leave a core dump file. from core dump, gdb shows that gdb) bt #0 add_dirs_to_tree (parent_ndx=-1, from_flist=0x56c590, dir_cnt=1) at flist.c:1422 #1 0x0000000000409eab in send_file_list (f=16, argc=-1, argv=0x56c238) at flist.c:2068 #2 0x0000000000419052 in client_run (f_in=16, f_out=16, pid=-1, argc=1,
2007 Jan 26
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4357] New: Missing bounds checking in send_files could lead crash
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4357 Summary: Missing bounds checking in send_files could lead crash Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2008 Oct 14
1
assert problem
rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd . .... lots of stuff works, but then.... .... dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz 1306806 100% 3.34MB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734) dvd/setdir/xlibs/ deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gst_plugins_base-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
2014 Dec 01
2
[Bug 10977] New: Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability (rsync 3.1.1 tested)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10977 Bug ID: 10977 Summary: Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability (rsync 3.1.1 tested) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core
2007 Nov 12
1
rsync 3.0.0 pre5 + hard link preversation trigger assert
I've setup rsync 3.0.0 pre5 on distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr (rsync server) and upload the same into mandriva cooker (development distribution). Someone reported this failure: rsync -auvPH --delete --exclude-from="/home/rfox/exclude.txt" distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr::mandrivalinux/devel/cooker/i586/ . receiving incremental file list rsync: hlink.c:253: check_prior: Assertion
2014 Nov 14
6
[Bug 10936] New: Rsync path hijacking attack vulnerability
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10936 Bug ID: 10936 Summary: Rsync path hijacking attack vulnerability Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2023 Feb 17
1
[feature request?]: Show progress only for big files
Hi, I've read through the rsync manpage, this mailing list, asked Google and studied lots of posts on stackexchange.com (stackoverflow, superuser...), askubuntu.com and some others, concerning rsync's capabilities of showing progress information. But all I've found was what I already knew: --progress (or -P) shows a progress information for *every* file transmitted, --info=progress2
2008 Mar 19
0
[PATCH] Unsnarl missing_below/dry_run logic.
The generator can skip a directory's contents altogether due to --ignore-non-existing, a daemon exclude, or a mkdir failure. On a --dry-run, the generator can also note the missingness of a directory while still scanning its contents. These two scenarios were conflated using a single set of missing_below/missing_dir variables in combination with transient increments in dry_run; this caused
2008 Mar 20
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5343] New: rsync does nothing after first time
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 Summary: rsync does nothing after first time Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: rolmol@broadpark.no
2009 Jul 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6542] New: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542 Summary: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core
2011 Dec 16
5
[Bug 8666] New: --debug=all9 fail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666 Summary: --debug=all9 fail Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact: rsync-qa at
2015 Sep 09
0
large rsync fails with assertion error
Ok I found a bug about this: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542 and it says fixed by upgrade. I found a way to upgrade. Using: rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31 on receiving side that issues the rsync command, and rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31 on the remote sending side. Im still getting the same thing: rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >=
2018 Jul 12
1
[Bug 13526] New: Hard link creation time
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13526 Bug ID: 13526 Summary: Hard link creation time Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: