similar to: any reason we can''t use the concise stubs on Object

In my Unit tests, I run into the all-too-common problem of Time.expects(:now) being called by Benchmark before the method is unmocked. Instead of messing around with the teardown order, I decided to modify the Expectation with a new method, .stops_mocking. Here are the changes I use, including a few monkey patches to push relevant objects down to where I want them, all wrapped up in a big ugly

Index: Rakefile =================================================================== --- Rakefile (revision 73) +++ Rakefile (working copy) @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ task.rdoc_dir = ''doc'' task.template = "html_with_google_analytics" task.options << "--line-numbers" << "--inline-source" -

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should be allowed To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #5856, was opened at 2006-09-22 17:03 You can respond by visiting:

I happened to mix ryan bates'' authentication scaffold with rspec_scaffold on a demo project. and ran into the problem of mixing mock frameworks...ryan uses mocha. So, as a learning experience, I choose to redo ryan''s tests without mocha but ran into a strange problem with tests of the User model. With debugging you can see.... If you run just the user_spec.rb file, everything

On 13/11/2007, Pradeep Gatram <pradeep.gatram at gmail.com> wrote: > > Let me put my dilemma as an example. Take a look at a snippet from > FooTest. > > #using mocha > def test_method1 > Bar.expects(:method2).with(''param1'', ''param2'').once > Foo.method1 > end > > And now the implementation > > class Foo > def

A question about the layout of structs: I decided to make my vtables out of structs rather than arrays. In other words, instead of being a table of opaque pointers, I decided to individually declare each entry with the correct type for that method. I figure that the various optimizers could do a better job if I preserve the type info. OK, so we come to the issue of inheritance: Suppose I have

Let''s say that I have a procedure that: * gets the number of bytes to write into some file * and returns the number of successfully written bytes def save( text, len ) This procedure is being used all over the place especially inside the method "process" which I want to test. Thus in order not to polute my filesystem I stub the "save" procedure. But of course in

Hi, I developed an app with cetain controller names. Now that the app is catching up I''m trying to change the controller names to be better aligned with the business. This is what I have now. http://localhost/foo/method1 http://localhost/foo/method2 http://localhost/foo/method2/a http://localhost/foo/method2/a/b http://localhost/foo/method2/a/b/c http://localhost/foo/method3 I would

JavaScript doesn''t (yet) have a notion of classes. Prototype.js just adds a suitable convention for implementing them. It provides a way to create a new class by extending a base class using Object.extend, but it doesn''t handle method inheritance. There are ways of doing implementing this through traversing the chain of prototypes, but I''m not sure they are

Dear all, I want to compare the efficiency of 2 methods in extracting proteins from algal samples. I collected 6 independant algal samples and I extracted 3 by the method 1 and 3 others by the method 2. So I have 2 groups of 3 samples, that are not paired. I would like to know if the results obtained by these 2 methods are significantly different, I hope method 2 to be more efficient than method

Here is my code. there are three method to get text to be parded by htmlParse function. 1.file on mycomputer options(encoding="gbk") library(XML) xmltext1 <- htmlParse("/home/tiger/Desktop/27174.htm" ) #/home/tiger/Desktop/27174.htm is the file of http://www.jb51.net/article/27174.htm downloaded on my computer. 2.url options(encoding="gbk")

Hello, I have a problem with a tklistbox. The user should be able to choose one out of two calculation methods needed for further calculations. My r-script for that purpose looks like that: require(tcltk) tt<-tktoplevel() tl<-tklistbox(tt,height=4,selectmode="single",background="white") tkgrid(tklabel(tt,text="select method for LAI

Hi James, An instance retains its mocha between tests if that instance is pointed to by a constant. The simplest failing test is something like (add as a new file in mocha/test).. #--code-- require File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "test_helper") require ''stubba'' class WemStubbaTest < Test::Unit::TestCase Arr = [1, 2, 3] def test_a

Hello, I am frastruated with this graph, just cannot get what I need. Thank you for any suggestions or help. I really appreciate it. I wrote the following code, but there are 3 problems 1, the red line is added on the graph but without any marker on the y-axis. I want to display the number '.1361' on the y-axis. So people can easily tell 'method 2' gets a constant estimate, which

Hello, I'm using ROCR to plot ROC Curves and I want to automate the saving of plots into PNG files using a custom function. My data frames are named like test1, test2, test3. Each data frame has three variables: method1, method2, goldstandard. Right now, for each plot I have to run: png('test1_method1.png') plot(performance(prediction(test1$method1, test1$goldstandard),

Is there a way to call a method if I only have a string that contains the method name. For example: @methods = [''method1'', ''method2'', ''method3''] @step = 1 # I want to call method2 which has a definition in this class -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi guys, I''m running mocha (0.3.2) against Rails core and just found an issue where the mock doesn''t go away after the test is run. For example: def test_reset_bang_doesn_reinstall_named_routes ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.expects(:install).never @session.reset! end def test_zzz puts ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.inspect

On my current project I needed to create a stub that responded correctly to the id message. Here''s the change I put into my copy of head. Index: lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb =================================================================== --- lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (revision 1114) +++ lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (working copy) @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ method_names =

I have been comparing the output of an R package to S+Finmetrics and I notice that the covariance matrix outputted by the two procedures is different. The R package computes the covariance matrix using Method 1 and I think ( but I'm not sure ) that S+Finmetrics computes it using Method 2. I put in a correctionfactor (see below ) in to Method 2 in order to deal with the fact that the var

Hi all: My data:data(sleep) If I wanna calculate each group's extra,what I can do is: #method1 attach(sleep) mean(extra[group==1]) mean(extra[group==1]) #method2 result<-matrix(,0,2) g<-split(sleep,sleep$group) for(i in 1:length(g)) { result<-rbind(result,data.frame(unique(g[[i]]$group),mean(g[[i]]$extra))) } colnames(result)<-c("name","mean") But the above