similar to: [ Re: best practises for mail systems]

hello! Can someone point me to some best practices in building high-available scalable mail system or! share your own success stories. I've read article in LJ "Building a Scalable High-Availability E-Mail System with Active Directory and More" but it seemed to be outdated and there's a single point of failure (Master node). What I want to achieve: high-available,

I'm designing a system where some but not all groups of users want to share a single mailbox, i.e the user will not have there own inbox. I think this is possible by setting up a user database that returns the same mail location and possible the same home directory. This sharing would only occur in a single domain. Example User Database UserID | home | mail all at site1.example.com |

In the ZFS Best Practises Guide here: http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide It says: ``Currently, pool performance can degrade when a pool is very full and file systems are updated frequently, such as on a busy mail server. Under these circumstances, keep pool space under 80% utilization to maintain pool performance.''''

Hi, I want some of my models to inherit from a custom ActiveRecord::Base class. Where is the best place to put this custom subclass? Actually, I just wanted to translate the default validate message so maybe there was a better thing to do than subclassing ActiveRecord::Base. Thanks Oscar --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low PC-to-Phone

Hi folks I have here a CentOS box where i need to setup cronjob (with session to remote Oracle instance). On the remote DB i have no access, expect limited user. How to avoid putting passwords in shell scripts? The solution doesn't need to be perfect, only better than plain text passwords in scripts. Mostly remote host only support password authentication (no certificates and so on).

All, We have Dovecot 1.0-stable deployed in our 3000 users environment as of last weekend. Up untill now, I have 3 issues: - When stopping Dovecot with: kill -TERM `cat /var/run/dovecot/master.pid`, the 'dovecot' process itself dies, the 'imap-login' processes die, but the 'imap' processes (there are a lot of them) don't die, but become a zombie. I think the way

I don't want such mailbox. I have inbox namespace mail_location = maildir:/mailStorage/%Ld/%Ln:LAYOUT=fs namespace inbox { ? type = private ? separator = / ? prefix = ? inbox = yes } and another private namespace used for archiving namespace archive { ?prefix = archived/ ?inbox = no ?type = private ?location = maildir:/mailStorageArchive/%Ld/%Ln:LAYOUT=fs ?mailbox Archive { ?

Hi All, Sorry to bother you again. I am not too familiar with IMAP yet, so maybe I am asking stupid questions. Here goes anyway: In our (Dovecot 1.0-stable) setup, we have two namespaces: the default namespace, which location is '/var/mailstore/1%u/%u' and the "Mailstorage" namespace, which location is '~/.Mailstorage/'. Now we create a folder called 'Test' in

Hello! somewhere in maillist I've seen RAID1+md concat+XFS being promoted as mailstorage. Does anybody in here actually use this setup? I've decided to give it a try, but ended up with not being able to recover any data off survived pairs from linear array when _the_first of raid1 pairs got down. thanks!

Dear All, I have a bit complex question about ldap based user/passdb with some twists caused by the LDAP schema I have to use. It's complex for me at least, since it's my first time to try to setup any dovecot install which is more than a "trivial" thing eg for some unix system users. What I'd like to do: Users are stored in LDAP with the following schema: storageMailUid:

Is it possible to create a highly-available OCFS2 cluster (i.e., A storage cluster that mitigates the single point of failure [SPoF] created by storing an OCFS2 volume on a single LUN)? The OCFS2 Project Page makes this claim... > OCFS2 is a general-purpose shared-disk cluster file system for Linux capable of providing both high performance and high availability. ...but without backing-up

> Hi all, Hi Marco, > I was thinking about integrating an old PBX with Asterisk and I was wondering > some possible configurations. You didn't mention the number of lines your PBX uses, but think of a third scenario: Install an asterisk with twice the number of BRI/PRI-Ports your current PBX has. Connect half of them to your carrier, the other ones to your old PBX (Some sort of

hi, check your /etc/openldap/ldap.conf for REFERRALS off I had this errors with "referrals on" in misconfigured dns environments. you can debug the dns packets by strace-ing the auth process On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:00:37 +0200 Fran <cumc-4361-2 at chguadalquivir.es> wrote: > Hello, > > my dovecot installation has been working fine against AD till we >

--- daemon/Makefile.am | 2 + daemon/lvm.c | 151 ---------------------------------------------- daemon/lvm.ml | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ daemon/lvm.mli | 19 ++++++ generator/actions_core.ml | 1 + 5 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/Makefile.am b/daemon/Makefile.am index 22a3036f8..e9c71ba3c 100644

i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat, but can't get any to work. I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and shed light onto the situation? #1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you

On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:25:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > sparsify/copying.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/in_place.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/utils.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sparsify/copying.ml b/sparsify/copying.ml > index 8d77964..165dd6e 100644 > --- a/sparsify/copying.ml > +++

Hi guys, I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong one ;) I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS. Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan | eth2

lvm2 2.02.107 adds the -S/--select option used in lvs to filter out only public LVs (see RHBZ#1278878). To make this work again with versions of lvm2 older than that, only on old versions filter out thin layouts and compose the resulting device strings ourselves. The filtering done is much simplier than what "-S lv_role=public" will do, but should be good enough for our need. ---

Hello List due to a mistake my post from yesterday has been cut. This is why I try to send my post again and open it as new thread. I hope it will work this time. <---- Original postet mail starts here ----> Hello Marcel, hello Samuel, sorry for my late answer, but I was away for two months and for that I could continue my tests last week. First of all thank you for your patch of the

Hi there, I got the solution for my problem, and thought may at someday somebody could use it. Julian Anastasov and some people from the LVS mailing list helped me with it. --- Subject: Re: LVS and CBQ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:53:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> To: joern maier <joern.maier@informatik.uni-ulm.de> CC: