similar to: PCI Passthrough, AMD, fails to initialize

We are using an Intel 82599 chip that allows 4 PFs ( eth0..3) per VM. I am able to manually start VMs using the hostdev definition for the four network connections, but I'd like to start using the pool approach. Ubuntu 12.04 libvirt 1.0.0 Following: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_from_a_pool_of_SRIOV_VFs_in_a_libvirt_.3Cnetwork.3E_definition I can get a pool working with

Hi, I try to add 2 VF functions to VM via network. Livirt networks: vnet0: <network> <name>vnet0</name> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> <pf dev='eth0'/> </forward> </network> vnet1: <network> <name>vnet0</name> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> <pf

On 02/26/2014 08:43 PM, Dax Kelson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:22 AM, john fisher <john@jpfisher.net > <mailto:john@jpfisher.net>> wrote: > > I get this error: > "error: Failed to create domain from ./vm0.xml > error: internal error Process exited while reading console log > output: kvm: -device >

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:22 AM, john fisher <john@jpfisher.net> wrote: > I get this error: > "error: Failed to create domain from ./vm0.xml > error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: > kvm: -device > pci-assign,host=01:10.1,id=hostdev0,configfd=47,bus=pci.0,addr=0x8: > Duplicate ID 'hostdev0' for device " > > Ideas?

Hello, here is a problem with KVM passthrough of TechnoTrend S2-6400. Bug report is done. The last answer of the debian maintainer: --> Please check with lspci -vv whenever your device is MSI-capable, --> and if yes, try to add prefer_msi=on to the pci-assign device --> argument -- like, from your original report, --> --> -device pci-

Hello list, In short: I am experiencing a problem where trying to start a VM which is allready running on a different libvirt host. Starting it fails, thanks to sanlock, but the disk dies on the original hypervisor and the vms filesystem is rendered read-only. Long version: i have the following setup: Two machines (H1 and H2) using CentOS 6.2 with the packages:

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15233 Summary: geforce 7800gs and AGP 3.0 DBI function Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Hello I've got small PBX (30 simultaneous connections) based on asterisk (1.6.2.6), which uses Stargate 2N ISDN to GSM gate. It runs ok for day or two, but then I get: dahdi: HDLC Receiver overrun on channel TE4/0/1/16 (master=TE4/0/1/16) in my kernel logs, in asterisk i get: pri show spans PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 3/0: Provisioned, In Alarm, Down, Active (span 3

...SNIP... cat /proc/interrupts=20 CPU0 CPU1 =20 0: 83 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 3: 100887 0 IO-APIC-edge serial 7: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0 8: 3 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 1 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi 16:

Hi, I'm having trouble with one machine that kernel panics with Asterisk 1.4. The motherboard is an Asus P5W Deluxe. I reported the kernel panic here: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2009-November/241006.html I'm now trying to understand if the problem can be an IRQ issue or not. I disabled APIC in the BIOS because I thought that maybe it could be buggy (not sure

Anyone else seen this eth-device and what brings it up? [root at oh1mrr etc]# ifconfig __tmp1192348344 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:AB:DD:2E:D1 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2094689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1645734 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX

I am running irqbalance with default configuration on an Atom 330 machine. This CPU has 2 physical cores + 2 SMT (aka Hyperthreading) cores. As shown below the interrupt for the eth0 device is always on CPUs 0 and 1, with CPUs 2 and 3 left idle. But why? Maybe irqbalance prefers physical cores? My understanding, though, is that the even-numbered CPUs are the physical cores, with the

Hello, I wanted to relaunch my problem with a quite precise and small question. Could the command "lsusb" affect interrupts when executing it regularly (cron) and if the zaptel pci card is sharing an interrupt with a usb bus? I have a Digium PRI card and a few Xorcom USB Devices. The Digium card seems to share the IRQ with some USB bus. cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1

Hi xen-users, I install xen, on gentoo linux. Install was ok, but i have an issue that i can''t solve. When booting in xen-linux, whereis no eth0 interface. When i boot non-xen kernel all is ok, eth0 is present. I use 2.6.18-xen kernel version. lspci show me: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82P965/G965 Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation

Hello all- I have a Digium TE410P in an HP DL145 G2 dual processor server that generates well over 100,000 interrupts per second (sometimes I?ve counted 160,000+ per second) generally resulting in either the system becoming swamped and unusable or the kernel disabling the IRQ the TE410P is on resulting in the spans on that card being unusable. I have confirmed that the card is good by placing it

Hello, I am trying to get a Wildcard TE110P to work in a relatively modern HP Proliant DL385p Gen8 server. Being a potent 12 core Opteron server I expected no problems. Much to my dismay the dahdi_test results are constantly terrible: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 89.101% 89.195% 89.142% 88.957% 88.953% 89.115% 89.089% 89.134% 89.066% 89.021% 88.933% 89.044%

Hello CentOS ! Iam trying to configure a Dual Core 1.6Ghz AMD E-350 machine to be able NIC (eth0) interrupts the most efficient way possible so that I can be able to handle the large number of random source packets per second. Currently running CentOS 6.4 2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64, i made some load testing with a random sourced syn flood to the NIC of this machine and found out according to

Greetings Peter, > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 2:01 PM > From: "Peter Krempa" <pkrempa@redhat.com> > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com> > Cc: "libvirt-usersredhat.com" <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: scsi passthrough differs between guests > > [...] > > > -drive

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:36:08 +0200, daggs wrote: > Greetings Peter, > > > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:52 AM > > From: "Peter Krempa" <pkrempa@redhat.com> > > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com> > > Cc: "libvirt-usersredhat.com" <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > > Subject: Re: scsi passthrough differs between

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 13:14:56 +0200, daggs wrote: > Greetings Peter, > > > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 2:01 PM > > From: "Peter Krempa" <pkrempa@redhat.com> > > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com> > > Cc: "libvirt-usersredhat.com" <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > > Subject: Re: scsi passthrough differs between