similar to: [stable 9]Dell R620 Ethernet Ordering

I was wondering if anyone is running Quagga on Xen? What is throughput/latency like? Was looking for about a gig of mixed packet size BGP throughput. Hardware is Opteron 4 Way Quad cores, was thinking paravirt with a couple of dedicated cores and maybe the addition of Solarflare 10GB Direct IO NICs might give the required performance level but I am unsure. The other option is multi-queue Intel

Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo tree. If anyone sees the obvious solution here, I'd love to figure it out. found-> vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165f, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=2, slot=0, func=1 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1

I'm unsure why this is failing this week, but when I build for FreeBSD HEAD, I now get a failure to find <stdarg.h>. Very strange. Maybe its missing a -I /usr/include somewhere? [1950/2811] Building CXX object projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.tsan-x86_64.dir/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc.o FAILED: /usr/bin/CC -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

Moving to llvmdev, as this is not a clang issue. David > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: 5 February 2015 17:00:34 GMT > From: Sean Bruno <sbruno at ignoranthack.me> > To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [cfe-dev] freebsd-mips64 unhandled .cpsetup > Reply-To: sbruno at freebsd.org > > > I'm taking a journey to try and get a clang/llvm build of

> ----- Original Message ----- > From: sthaug@nethelp.no > To: freebsd-security@dfmm.org > Subject: Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:20:18 +0200 (CEST) > > > > I realize that resources to keep chasing this stuff are in > > limited supply, but if you solicit the opinion of the community, > > I'd

The mystery gets more interesting... I now have a CentOS 7.3 Dell R710 server doing the exact same thing of rebooting immediately after the Xen kernel load. Just to note this is a second system and not just the first system with an update. I hope I'm not introducing something odd. They only "interesting" thing I have done for historical reasons is to change the following

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On October 31st, FreeBSD 5.3 and FreeBSD 5.4 will have reached their End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of either of those FreeBSD releases are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 5.5 or FreeBSD 6.1 before that date. In addition, the FreeBSD 6.0 End of Life is presently scheduled

The redbuild boxes for redports are doing a very good and reliable job getting kernel panics out of 10.0: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/redbuild_panic.txt Pretty frequent and pretty nasty. Happening on multiple machines under load. sean -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc:

Hello, I already consulted related lists @freebsd.org [1,2] but I have remained unsuccessful to solve the following issue: VPN works for an internal IPv4 subnet, but I doesn't for an internal IPv6 subnet with ULAs. To be honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess that I'm doing something wrong here. For those that know FreeBSD: The main aim is to connect

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 03/28/2017 04:55 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > > The mystery gets more interesting... I now have a CentOS 7.3 Dell R710 > > server doing the exact same thing of rebooting immediately after the Xen > > kernel load. Just to note this is a second system and not just the first > > system with an

My xorg.conf foo is pretty weak today. Does anyone have an ATI 4250 in a dual head config? I'd be interested in looking over your xorg.conf. Sean p.s. Mine at the moment, that doesn't work very well: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/4250_xorg_conf.txt

I have signed and pushed the libvirt-1.2.15-3 and kenel-3.18.12-11 RPMs into the xen4 repository for CentOS-6.6. These have been in virt6-testing for a few months now with no negative reports. They should be available on mirror.centos.org in 30 or so minutes and externally as those mirrors update themselves against mirror. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A

As a follow up I was able to test fresh install on Dell R710 and a Dell R620 with success on CentOS 7.3 without issue on the new kernel. My new plan will be to just move this C6 to one of the C7 I just created. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, 6:27 AM PJ Welsh <pjwelsh at gmail.com> wrote: > The last few lines are > NMI watchdog: disabled CPU0 hardware events not enabled > NMI watchdog:

I just put a call into AT&T Office 365 asking them to explain the spoof warning thing... To answer your question.... At the moment, no I can't. I like HPE stuff, we bought a DL380 gen9 say five months ago and totally happy with it. In fairness, its running Server 2012 r2 too but I didn't run into the hardware gotchas I did on the other stuff. It just seems HPE skimped on their lower

>Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:19:12 -0400 >From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> >To: Spike White <spikewhitetx at gmail.com> >Cc: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa <syslinux at zytor.com> >Subject: Re: [syslinux] UEFI PXE / split config / TFTP attempted to > DHCP server, not TFTP server >Message-ID: >

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If there's any

sthaug at nethelp.no [2016-05-27 08:53 +0200] : > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: [...] > 96 bit works too: [...] FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. Dunno. Could be that I made some mistake but I also tried the setup with /96 and adding the route to the tap0 interface and it did not work. Niklaas -------------- next part -------------- A

Hi Maby stupid question :) It possible to have 3 directors (frontend) but without rings ? All directors connect to this same dovecot (backend) - all backad have this same login_trusted_networks -- Maciej Mi?aszewski IQ PL Sp. z o.o. Starszy Administrator Systemowy

Hi folks, Firstly; apologies in advance for what is a head wrecker of keeping on top of the speculative mitigations and also if this is a duplicate email; my first copy didn't seem to make it into the archive. Also a disclaimer that I may have misunderstood elements of the below but please bear with me. I write this hoping to find out a bit more about the state of the relevant kernel