similar to: mechanize 0.7.0 Released

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "mechanize 0.7.0 Released"

2007 Dec 10
3
Road to 0.7.0
Hey everyone, I''ve been refactoring Mechanize for an 0.7.0 release. Basically I''m trying to clean the code up and there are a few features that I think are unnecessary, but I would like to ask people first. 1) REXML as a parser. I want to remove support for REXML. I don''t use it. Hpricot seems to do everything I need. 2) 1.8.2 thru 1.8.4 support
2007 Mar 25
5
mechanize 0.6.6 Released
mechanize version 0.6.6 has been released! http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/ The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: =
2007 Apr 15
0
mechanize 0.6.8 Released
mechanize version 0.6.8 has been released! http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/ The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: = Mechanize
2008 Mar 12
0
mechanize 0.7.3 Released
mechanize version 0.7.3 has been released! * <http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/> The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: #
2007 Jul 27
0
mechanize 0.6.10 Released
mechanize version 0.6.10 has been released! * <http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/> The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: #
2007 Mar 28
0
mechanize 0.6.7 Released
mechanize version 0.6.7 has been released! http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/ The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: = Mechanize
2007 Feb 27
0
mechanize 0.6.5 Released
mechanize version 0.6.5 has been released! http://mechanize.rubyforge.org/ The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. Changes: =
2006 Sep 11
0
mechanize lists
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:04:49AM -0400, Mat Schaffer wrote: > I noticed that my message is the first post to mechanize- > users at rubyforge.org. Should I post to devel? That looks empty too, > but I thought I''d check if you were only watching the devel list and > not the users list. Hey Mat, this is definitely a bug in mechanize. If you add this to your script, it
2009 Mar 11
0
problem scrapping ATnT site (Matt White)
Try to use firebug to assist you finding these changes. I never used AT&T website, but you may need to login and find the download url using firebug as I did: http://zenmachine.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/scraping-with-firebug-and-wwwmechanize/ regards, gm On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM, <mechanize-users-request at rubyforge.org>wrote: > Send Mechanize-users mailing list submissions
2009 Jul 26
3
Failed to build gem native extension
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Jeffrey Roberts<jeffrey.l.roberts at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, I have looked up and down on google for a solution to this going > on several days now, I am really hoping someone here can help me out. > > I have all my deps in order, and I believe the error is that it is looking > in /usr/lib when it should be looking in /usr/lib64, I am
2008 Jan 16
3
settings headers in mechanize
hi, a potential mechanize user here. i''ve looked at the API but it''s not clear what capacity there is to arbitrarily set the headers - does mechanize allow for this? mechanize is clearly great for web browsing, but i also need to construct get and post requests from scratch. i''ve looked at net:http, libcurl, openuri, but mechanize seems simpler and more functional than
2008 Mar 11
8
Mechanize#get vs Mechanize#fetch_page
So I found myself wanting to call Mechanize#get with a hash for arguments like this: WWW::Mechanize.new(''http://api.flickr.com/services/rest/'', {:method => ''flickr.auth.getFrob''... }) Granted, it looks like this isn''t supported but it led me to what looks like a bug. Namely that get calls fetch_page(abs_uri, request, cur_page, &block)
2006 Sep 26
7
Interesting mechanize difficulty
I found an interesting page today that I was trying to script against. The server returns a 404 with content and the page just works normally in firefox despite the 404. Mechanize raises an exception on it though. I''m working on a test case now.
2008 Mar 10
2
Mechanize for multi-part form post
Hi, I''m interested in using Mechanize as a way around manual multipart form creation. But the API is really centered around the idea of a form built from a page. I''d love to see a syntax like: response = agent.post(''http://www.mydomain.com/upload'', :image => File.new(file), :title => "My image", :description => "an image
2012 Sep 22
2
Mechanize and Thread-Safety Revisited
This post from Aaron Patterson back in 2009 seems to be pretty definite about how to use Mechanize in a thread-safe way, but I thought I would revisit the question because there are several posts on StackOverflow since then that would seem to contradict it (of course, I trust Aaron''s answer more than random answers on StackOverlfow, but just in case I thought I would confirm it). It is
2007 Feb 26
1
some Mechanize objects never garbage collected?
Greetings, I''m using Mechanize to scrap dozens of pages and have noticed the size of my ruby process keeps growing. I set Mechanize.max_history to 0 with no effect on the memory use. I wrote a little test to show the objects left on the heap after mechanizing a single page and then doing a garbage collection. Sample list appended below. I can supply the test code if it helps.
2008 Jan 15
1
Converting Watir script to Mechanize
I have a Watir script that I would like to convert to a Mechanize script. The watir code looks like this require ''watir'' include Watir def test ie = IE.new ie.goto(''http://cpref.gsm.com/inter.asp?r=8084'') ie.text_field(:name, ''inter_string'').set(''Potassium'') ie.button(:id, ''image1'').click
2007 Jul 12
1
WWW::Mechanize::Link.inspect needs some TLC
The problem: users trying to debug Mechanize apps with Komodo are finding the debugger times out once it''s loaded a web page. They don''t run into this in the ruby-debug debugger, or running in normal mode. The reason: Komodo''s debugger is graphical, which means that whenever it hits a breakpoint it automatically shows the contents of each local variable. It has a
2006 Nov 07
5
mechanize: 400 Bad Request
Hello, when trying to access a certain HTML-frame, I get: "in `request'': Unhandled response (WWW::Mechanize::ResponseCodeError)" and the page returns: "400 Bad Request" * Why? * How to solve this? With browser, it works. In the logs below, I marked 4 lines with "***", where I see possible differences in the URI. But I don''t know, if this is
2008 Jun 12
1
setting request headers via get()
Hey all, Found a email thread from Jan 2007 discussing the inability to set request headers (like ETag and If-Modified-Since) through the API, and this is something that''s bothering me a bit. Currently the "way" to do this is to subclass Mechanize and override set_headers(). That seems fine for headers that you''d like to send in every request or for classes of request,