Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "plugin: Don't allow deleting the last instance of a mail"
2012 Sep 11
2
v2.1 memory usage
v2.1's imap/pop3 processes are linked with OpenSSL by default, because of imapc/pop3c storages. I wonder if you notice any actual (system-global) memory usage reduction when compiling without those and you have thousands of imap processes?
./configure --with-storages=mdbox sdbox maildir mbox cydir
I guess I could try it myself also but maybe someone else wanting to reduce memory usage is
2012 Sep 12
5
question on "doveadm user" and pass/userdb
Hi,
I'm about getting to know dovecot in details, I am about the command
"doveadm user". The man page shows this example:
userdb: jane
uid : 8001
gid : 8001
home : /home/jane
mail : sdbox:~/sdbox
plugins : sieve
quota_rule: *:storage=150M
It seems to be nice, however I never got this only:
~# doveadm
2015 Apr 10
1
dovecot debug message help required
hi
i was carrying out some testing using qmailtoaster with dovecot on a centos 64 server
i am connecting to the mailbox using a windows machine with outlook across the lan.
the mailbox is around 7gb in size with around 12000 emails spread across multiple folders and i am trying to sync the mailbox folders to by creating an account imap account in outlook.
the mails are getting downloaded in
2019 May 22
1
Converting user mailboxes from maildir to sdbox
Hello,
I've got a Postfix/Dovecot server setup. Currently Dovecot is version
2.3.6, and it's using Maildir storage. The mailbox is:
mail_home = /home/vmail/mailboxes/%d/%n
mail_location = maildir:~/mail:LAYOUT=fs
I'm wanting to convert from Maildir to sdbox. I looked at:
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat
I was initially thinking mdbox but that's multiple messages per
2012 Feb 02
1
dsync deleting too many emails (sdbox)
I'm using dsync to synchronize emails on a laptop where wifi connectivity
sometimes fails in the middle of a sync. I have a shell script that runs
dsync, and here is one line of it including the output of dsync:
+ dsync -f -m realmail mirror /home/paulproteus/projects/ssh-attach/run ssh rose.makesad.us dsync
dsync-local(paulproteus): Error: dbox
2018 May 16
1
[ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox
Thanks Jack.
That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider.
In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that
and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed.
Regards,
Webert Lima
DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
*Belo Horizonte - Brasil*
*IRC NICK - WebertRLZ*
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
2019 Jun 24
1
Mail migration problem
Yeah, I think dovecot was a custom compiled build
Version is 2.2.18
Config:
# 2.2.18: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.4.8
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-754.14.2.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.10 (Final) xfs
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_mechanisms = plain login
dict {
acl = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext
}
disable_plaintext_auth = no
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe =
2011 Jan 17
2
Question about indexes and maildir/sdbox/mdbox
Hello
We are now running dovecot 2.0.9 with indexes in a ram disk and
maildir storage in a test system. We have the following questions:
- If there is a power outage / kernel crash, we will lose the
content of ramdisk. We have tested that indexes are regenerated when a
user logs in via imap, so e-mail access will be "slower" after a power
outage / kernel crash, but
2018 May 15
2
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
With this settings I don't get the expectet result, still get wrong
permissions on new mailboxes. Aki did you also try with %u ?
> In /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf follow options are set:
> mail_gid = mail
> mail_privileged_group = mail
> mail_access_groups = mail
> mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%u
On 15.05.2018 13:06, Aki Tuomi
2012 Jan 18
4
Performance of Maildir vs sdbox/mdbox
Hi Guys,
I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance
information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot in
order to make an assessment on which format is right for our environment.
This is a brand new build, with customer mailboxes to be migrated in over
the course of 3-4 months.
Some details on our new environment:
* Approximately 1.6M+
2018 May 16
1
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
Yes, this settings work as i expected, but i didn't found documentation for
mail_home=
Thanks
On 15.05.2018 20:10, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Well, that's not what I asked you to try...
>
> try
>
> mail_home=/var/spool/mail/%u
> mail_location=mdbox:~/
>
> Aki
>
>> On 15 May 2018 at 20:03 telsch <telsch at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
2016 Apr 05
4
namespace...mailbox doesn't exist
Hello list,
I have a namespace called 'projects' which when clicked in Thunderbird
(nonexistent in eM Client) yields the following error:
"The current operation on 'projects' did not succeed. The mail server
for account
user at domain.tld responded: mailbox doesn't exist: projects.projects
(0.00 + 0.00 secs)."
The namespace is configure as follows:
# Shared
2018 May 16
2
dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox
I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't
mind if something seems too obvious for you.
Hi,
I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain
what's going on.
Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when
using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message.
When using mdbox, multiple
2010 Jul 16
2
Questions about dbox (sdbox?), mdbox
Hello,
So ive spent the last 45 minutes or so searching the list for dbox
stuff, but Im not seeing anything real definitive.
My question is basically whether the dbox format is ready for
production environment, is sdbox or mdbox more stable/ready than the
other or does it matter? What are people's experience/review with
running this format (and if you reply can you tell me which one
2010 Sep 25
2
mdbox
Reviewing some mailing list archives and the wiki, I still don't have
a real clear picture of why I'd want to use mdbox. What I've taken from
the info I've reviewed says mdbox is more complicated (than sdbox), has
greater potential for breakage (simply because it's more complex), and
has a theoretical performance impact depending on the exact
filesystem/hardware used.
2012 Aug 09
1
maildir to sdbox offline conversion
Hi all. I've just installed dovecot v2.1 in a multihomed, multiinstance
setup, It took me two days to convert the old v1.1 configs, now everything
works like charm! But. :)
I have several maildir mailboxes, I decided to use the sdbox storage type
instead.
I ran into difficoulties using the dsync util.
My virtual users are in an OpenLDAP DB on a differnet machine, and I do not
have access
2017 May 02
2
migrate Maildir to mdbox
Silly question?
Which is preferred? MailDir or Mbox? (directory vs flat file)
How would you do this when migrating from an old server to a new one?
Thx
-Mike
> On May 2, 2017, at 1:58 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote:
>
> Assuming your maildir path is /path/to/mail/Maildir You could do it like this:
>
> mail_home=/path/to/mail
>
2015 Jun 24
2
EXT4/LVM recommendations for 3TB of mdbox ?
Hello,
Do you have recommendations on EXT4 and LVM options for a 3TB
file-system for mdbox?
We currently use the mbox format on a XFS with poor performances since
the update in v2.1 (Debian).
We will switch to EXT4 to have the possibility of shrinking the
file-system if needed (which is not possible with XFS), we currently
have LVM partitions but with mdbox we will use LVM snapshots to
2023 Mar 21
1
"doveadm altmove -r" not working ?
Hi,
Your problem might be similar to mine a long time ago. IMO behavior of
"doveadm altmove -r" command with mdbox format is different to sdbox format:
- With sdbox format, when you move back a message to primary storage
(aka default storage), only the message and the file containing it are
affected. There is nothing impacted.
- With mdbox format, a file in storage contains
2012 Feb 12
2
v2.1.0 status
I'll release v2.1.rc6 in maybe 16 hours or so. If no problems are reported in it after a few days I'll just change version to 2.1.0. So now's a great time to try the latest v2.1 hg version to see if there are any problems.
I've gone through all of my old mails. Let me know if you think something is still missing / unfixed in v2.1 hg. Preferably today.
Next up: Creating