Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches similar to: "xulrunner 1.9.2.26 available in repackaged form for use with legacy programs"
2012 Mar 10
3
Dependency issues when running yum update
Hi All,
Am getting this:
---> Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos will be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libmozjs.so for package:
gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 (@rpmforge)
Requires: libmozjs.so
Removing: xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686 (@updates)
2012 May 10
1
Installing an *older* version of xulrunner (eg as a compatibility package)?
Is there a way of installing xulrunner-1.9 along side xulrunner-10.0? I
have an application that wants the older version of xulrunner and does
not seem to work with xulrunner-10.0.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com
Deepwoods Software -- http://www.deepsoft.com/
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against
2012 Feb 17
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2012 Feb 01
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2012 Feb 01
0
CESA-2012:0079 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0079 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0079.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
3d2fd820790a0362cd0907ef95c0d87f9eeafa4aae1019e90c3657240f24abfa firefox-3.6.26-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
2012 Feb 01
0
CESA-2012:0079 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0079 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0079.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
616dfcd73837cd45a5e808ef6128c4014bf0f281f1dcea836755bb537ff8ff79 firefox-3.6.26-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
2012 Feb 17
0
CESA-2012:0143 Critical CentOS 5 xulrunner Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0143 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0143.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0dcf1983ec06f56f3009843c736af1cf93d5da0d3e02bdf6780e58401cd3cf82 xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el5_7.i386.rpm
2012 Feb 17
0
CESA-2012:0143 Critical CentOS 6 xulrunner Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0143 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0143.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8749ac0dda4b4a136606ce579bdbf0f843e1a032a591b151bdec5576a3559c3c xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm
2010 Aug 29
0
need help for a repackaging problem!
Hy,
I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created!
I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package.
I use to launch R from Excel!
And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i
still find the problem on my function.
And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the
old version of my function (the one from the
2011 Jul 15
2
VMware Thinapp and Kace Repackager + Adobe CS5
I've read the DB for Adobe Photoshop CS5, and a member mentioned using Kace Repackager to create a installable MSI package. I cant find much docs or guides to using the program and Im having trouble using it. I would select Setup.exe for the Photoshop or Dreamweaver installation, allow it to pre and post scan the changes and the result is a unexpected small .msi file. How do you use this msi
2008 Dec 17
1
RPM rollback/repackage with CentOS 4
Hi,
Is there any way to list availabe RPM rollback's and timestamps in CentOS 4?
It's possible to get RPM rollbacks with up2date, but appears that's
deprecated ;-(
# up2date --list-rollbacks
This feature is deprecated and no longer functional
I want a method to list current available rollback and the timestamp:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7034
How do you deal with this
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Sent:
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>
> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
> repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released
> firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see
>
2019 May 08
1
Firefox esr repackage
cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!!
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
> >
> > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :)
BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>> The price we pay.. :)
>
> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
a priority for them.
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hello Nux!,
On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it.
>
> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hi Nux,
The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download
once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used
to work each download went to at least 6 systems, probably more.
Regards,
Martin
On 10/05/2019 10:12, Nux! wrote:
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>:
>>
>> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year
>> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading
>> stuff from it.
>>
>> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and
>> some users were using multiple IPs
2010 Aug 28
1
problem after repackaging
Hy,
I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created!
I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package.
I use to launch R from Excel!
And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i
still find the problem on my function.
And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the
old version of my function (the one from the