similar to: xulrunner 1.9.2.26 available in repackaged form for use with legacy programs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches similar to: "xulrunner 1.9.2.26 available in repackaged form for use with legacy programs"

2012 Mar 10
3
Dependency issues when running yum update
Hi All, Am getting this: ---> Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libmozjs.so for package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: gxine-0.5.905-1.el6.rf.i686 (@rpmforge) Requires: libmozjs.so Removing: xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686 (@updates)
2012 May 10
1
Installing an *older* version of xulrunner (eg as a compatibility package)?
Is there a way of installing xulrunner-1.9 along side xulrunner-10.0? I have an application that wants the older version of xulrunner and does not seem to work with xulrunner-10.0. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com Deepwoods Software -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against
2012 Feb 17
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2012 Feb 01
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2012 Feb 01
0
CESA-2012:0079 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0079 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0079.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 3d2fd820790a0362cd0907ef95c0d87f9eeafa4aae1019e90c3657240f24abfa firefox-3.6.26-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
2012 Feb 01
0
CESA-2012:0079 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0079 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0079.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 616dfcd73837cd45a5e808ef6128c4014bf0f281f1dcea836755bb537ff8ff79 firefox-3.6.26-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
2012 Feb 17
0
CESA-2012:0143 Critical CentOS 5 xulrunner Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0143 Critical Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0143.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0dcf1983ec06f56f3009843c736af1cf93d5da0d3e02bdf6780e58401cd3cf82 xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el5_7.i386.rpm
2012 Feb 17
0
CESA-2012:0143 Critical CentOS 6 xulrunner Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0143 Critical Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0143.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8749ac0dda4b4a136606ce579bdbf0f843e1a032a591b151bdec5576a3559c3c xulrunner-1.9.2.26-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm
2010 Aug 29
0
need help for a repackaging problem!
Hy, I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created! I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package. I use to launch R from Excel! And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i still find the problem on my function. And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the old version of my function (the one from the
2011 Jul 15
2
VMware Thinapp and Kace Repackager + Adobe CS5
I've read the DB for Adobe Photoshop CS5, and a member mentioned using Kace Repackager to create a installable MSI package. I cant find much docs or guides to using the program and Im having trouble using it. I would select Setup.exe for the Photoshop or Dreamweaver installation, allow it to pre and post scan the changes and the result is a unexpected small .msi file. How do you use this msi
2008 Dec 17
1
RPM rollback/repackage with CentOS 4
Hi, Is there any way to list availabe RPM rollback's and timestamps in CentOS 4? It's possible to get RPM rollbacks with up2date, but appears that's deprecated ;-( # up2date --list-rollbacks This feature is deprecated and no longer functional I want a method to list current available rollback and the timestamp: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7034 How do you deal with this
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent:
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released > firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see >
2019 May 08
1
Firefox esr repackage
cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :) BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up): https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> The price we pay.. :) > > Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? > > Regards, > Simon > No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's a priority for them.
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hello Nux!, On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hi Nux, The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used to work each download went to at least 6 systems, probably more. Regards, Martin On 10/05/2019 10:12, Nux! wrote: > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>: >> >> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year >> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading >> stuff from it. >> >> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and >> some users were using multiple IPs
2010 Aug 28
1
problem after repackaging
Hy, I had a mistake on a function of a package i have created! I have solved it and then i repackaged and installed the modified package. I use to launch R from Excel! And so when i launch R, and next call my function from the workspace, i still find the problem on my function. And when i read on my workspace, the source code of my function, i find the old version of my function (the one from the