similar to: Intel 1000/PRO GT (e1000 driver) and "Detect Tx Unit Hang" error with 4GB RAM

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Intel 1000/PRO GT (e1000 driver) and "Detect Tx Unit Hang" error with 4GB RAM"

2007 Nov 09
1
Intel 1000/PRO GT (e1000 driver) and "Detect Tx Unit
Hmmm...any chance that you can ellaborate on what updates will be included with 5.1. Not sure if it will be of practical interest anymore (I have 4 new network cards...non-Intel..on the way) since I have spent far more time on this problem than I should have. But, from a curiousity perspective, I am curious. If I could resolve this problem and use the Intel cards, that would be ideal.
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On 05/10/2018 02:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi, > > In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC, > link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is > executed What is your definition of "becomes ready"? Are you looking at the output of "ip link show" in the guest? Or are you watching "brctl
2020 Jan 17
0
Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > Folks > > I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000' > driver have been removed from the base distribution. However, I have > exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not > PCIe). Is there a way for me to add support for that on Centos > 8.1?
2020 Jan 18
0
Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver
At 03:27 PM 1/17/2020, Akemi Yagi wrote: >On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > > > Folks > > > > I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000' > > driver have been removed from the base distribution. However, I have > > exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not > >
2010 Dec 27
2
E1000 eth1 link flakiness - causes??
Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I need to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks. Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:19 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Dec 4 10:18:21 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:23 localhost kernel:
2005 Oct 03
2
ethool for e1000
I recently noticed that after starting xend ethtool no longer work for my e1000 card. In my 2.X box which is a P4, ethtool is working after xend start. Same version of e1000 on both boxes. The unstable box is a Tyan 2462 SMP, FC4 dom0 The 2.X box is Dell P330 UP, Centos 4.1 domO Until xend start ethtool is fine, in both setups I am using the e1000 as eth0. Regards, Ted
2018 Mar 23
0
Re: [PATCH] v2v: ova: convert E1000 network interfaces as such
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:35:36PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > So far v2v did not read the model of network interfaces, resulting in > "virtio" as the model for such interfaces. > > Start reading the model, if available, mapping only E1000 for now. Looks sensible, ACK. > There are also other models, e.g. PCNet32 or VmxNet3, but they are > ignored for now: reading
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
Hi, try to use virtio instead... Atte. Daniel Romero P. On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC, > link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is > executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot > process
2018 May 11
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:53:23AM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi, > > In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC, > link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is > executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot > process for up to 1 minute [2]. If we switch from e1000 to virtio, the > link is
2012 Jan 09
0
KVM VM crash under I/O load (e1000 and virtio)
I'm pretty consistently getting crashed KVM VMs under network I/O load when using the e1000 and virtio NIC models, with the follow message in dmesg: qemu-kvm[8785]: segfault at d0 ip 00000031e3200a08 sp 0000000047784080 error 4 in libnvidia-tls.so.285.05.23[31e3200000+3000] qemu-kvm[8791]: segfault at d0 ip 00000031e3200a08 sp 0000000049f89080 error 4 in
2007 Nov 16
1
PCI Mapping of e1000 Dual-Port Adapter to DomU
Hello, I´m trying to map one network interface of a Dual-Port e1000 Server Adapter to a DomU (firewall). In Dom0 the adaper is seen with lspci as: 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN Controller Copper (rev 01) 06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB DPT LAN Controller Copper (rev 01) My goal is to map only 06:00.1 to DomU so I used this
2006 Jun 25
3
e1000 nic problem
Hi, I've been experiencing occassional network time-outs with the Intel Gigabit nic's (e1000) in Poweredge systems. I'm not sure if it's a hard or software problem but it occurs on different systems with Centos 4.2 and 4.3 and was wondering if there' s a workaround available like compiling an updated e1000 module or something. kind regards, Geert -------------- next part
2007 Aug 30
3
machine with 2 ethernet cards e1000 and forcedeth
I am using centos 5 x86_64 AMD64 X2 4200+. I am current on yum update. My machine has two ethernet cards. e1000 (eth0) and forcedeth (eth1) [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# more /etc/modprobe.conf alias eth0 e1000 alias eth1 forcedeth sometimes on boot the forcedeth driver thinks it is eth0: [root at fsdsigns2 ~]# dmesg | grep eth forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.60.
2008 Nov 25
0
7.1 RC E1000 fix
Anyone running 7.1 and using E1000 hardware that has the time, I would appreciate any testing you can do. This has an important fix for SuperMicro servers but any regression test of the code would be helpful. Backup the contents of /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000 and then overwrite with this tarball. Send feedback to me, Jack
2009 Mar 21
0
Bug#520629: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: Intel e1000 network card emulation
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal Hi, Is the e1000 network card within domU no longer available? With model=e1000 a Xen domain refuses to start while with etch this was possible. There are some Windows guests on which I can not install gplpv, so with lenny they will just get 100mbit ethernet emulated. Cheers, Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release:
2008 Dec 10
0
domU, Failed to obtain physical IRQ, e1000 Intel NIC
Hello all. I''ve upgraded my drives, and in doing so loaded FC8. Latest kernel-xen.x86_64 (2.6.21.7-5) and xen.x86_64 (3.1.2-5) available, using 2 Intel NICs with e1000 driver. All worked fine on FC5 with custom domU FC5 with pcifront and NIC drivers in kernel. Now, I''m unable to get the NICs to function inside my domU. The are visible in lspci, and ipconfig. DomU dmesg
2018 Mar 23
2
[PATCH] v2v: ova: convert E1000 network interfaces as such
So far v2v did not read the model of network interfaces, resulting in "virtio" as the model for such interfaces. Start reading the model, if available, mapping only E1000 for now. There are also other models, e.g. PCNet32 or VmxNet3, but they are ignored for now: reading them as Source_other_nic would result in v2v rejecting OVAs previously converted. --- v2v/parse_ovf_from_ova.ml
2007 Feb 07
2
Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver - Correction
Actually, here is what shows up in the log, regardless of whether the driver is built-in or loaded as a module: Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.sysrq = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1
2017 Mar 30
2
2.6.0-28.el7_3.6.1 e1000 problem
Hello! We tried to move Windows 2003 VM with e1000 driver from Centos 7 which runs qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.7.x86_64 to Centos 7 with qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.6.1.x86_64 and we got problems- tcp sessions, namely smb connections, randomly drops. We didn't test previous qemu-rhev with this VM, so we don't know how it works in them. Could you tell me is this known problem? Any
2020 Jan 17
3
Centos 8 and E1000 intel driver
Folks I know that support for the network adaptors supported by the 'e1000' driver have been removed from the base distribution. However, I have exactly that controller (Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet PCI, not PCIe). Is there a way for me to add support for that on Centos 8.1? Perhaps a driver in an RPM package? Thanks David