similar to: Topic Modeling- package lda

Ankit, >From within GDB you can run the following command: "call m->dump()" This will print the module in the bitcode in a textual format. From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Ankit Sethia Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 20:56 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] dump a module from inside GDB to a file Hi All, I

Hi, I found that machine dead code elimination, does not respect the calling convention of alpha and eliminates r16, which was set correctly during code generation. I verified it with -print-after-all. Does anybody have a patch for this? On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ankit Sethia <asethia at eecs.umich.edu>wrote: > Hi All, > > I am using llvm-2.9 to cross compile to alpha. I

Dear ALL Please tell me how to configure Openldap in rhel 5 Please send me links & document Thanks in advance Ankit Jariwala 9725655020

Hello LLVM community, I was trying to port a target specific loop transformation pass (HexagonVectorLoopCarriedReusePass) to the New Pass Manager. However, I could not figure out a way to register this pass with opt. I can see that llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def is the registry for target independent passes. Can anyone point me to an example/API which can help me in registering this pass so

Hi Olly, I updated my local repo and built it again, but still getting the error. I took a look at python3/test-suite.log file, but I could not locate the source of test failure. Please find attached the log file with this email. I am available on IRC(nick : ankit_agrawal) if that seems a convenient medium for you to help me out with this issue. Thanks. Regards, Ankit Agrawal,

Hi All, I changed the CFG of a big function using a pass that runs on a function, I am having trouble debugging it. Is there someway to dump a module to a file from inside gdb? I have access to the Module pointer. Let me know if anything else is needed. -- *Ankit* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

For my case, I can't replace these call instructions with inline assembly code because I need to encode the registers into the "number". For instance, if the call instruction is %result = call i32 @foo(i32 %a) and the result is assigned to register %l0 and the variable "a" to register %l1, then I encode all foo, %l0 and %l1 and generate a sethi instruction. thanks,

On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline assembly code that does what you want? If that works, it seems much simpler than modifying/enhancing the code generator. -- John T. > I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. >

Hi, Can people suggest how this is solved for other ISAs? This happens only for Alpha and not for x86-64. The register 16 does not have any uses within that function, but is used inside puts. So Machine DCE thinks it is dead code. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ankit Sethia <asethia at eecs.umich.edu>wrote: > Hi, > > I found that machine dead code elimination, does not respect

Hello all, I am trying to modify the Sparc backend to do something for my team's project, to do the following. Whenever the backend encounters a call to one particular type of function names (functions like p0(), p1()..etc), I want the backend to generate a "sethi %g0, <number>", and NOT a "call p0, call p1..." instruction. However, the backend should work as usual

Hi all, I installed xapian smoothly as per the guidelines mentioned in the HACKING file. However, I am getting test errors on tests related to python3 bindings after running them using `make check` on this fresh installation. The log can be seen here <http://pastebin.com/bnsTFG2e>. Can anyone here help me out to figure out why they are failing? Please let me know if any more

I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. 1. Add a new intrinsic function to LLVM that corresponds to "functions with particular type of function names". The steps to create intrinsic function is documented in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html#intrinsic. 2. Create a lowering pass that lowers "functions with particular type" ( eg. p0, p1) to

Hi everyone, This is Ankit; currently final-year Computer Science undergrad at Panjab University, India. I am well versed in C++ and have a pretty decent understanding of sockets. I successfully completed GSoC last year for IDI, project titled - Google App Module for ATutor. Quite recently, I have been working on the project idea - Replacing Xapian socket code with ZeroMQ. This is to inquire

Hi All, I changed the CFG of a big function using a pass that runs on a function, I am having trouble debugging it. Is there someway to dump a module to a file from inside gdb? I have access to the Module pointer. Let me know if anything else is needed. -- Ankit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, I am using llvm-2.9 to cross compile to alpha. I know that alpha is in experimental stage, but i can not get even the "Hello World" program to run on it. Here is what happens, the bitcode file for the hello world program is as follow: ; ModuleID = 'hello.bc' target datalayout =

Hi, There are some generated Sparc assembly code like this: main: ! @main ! BB#0: save %sp, -112, %sp sethi 0, %l0 or %g0, 5, %l1 st %l0, [%fp+-4] st %l1, [%fp+-8] st %l1, [%fp+-12] sethi %hi(.L.str), %l1 ld [%fp+-8], %o1 add %l1, %lo(.L.str), %l1 or %g0, %l1, %o0 call printf nop ld [%fp+-12], %o2 ld [%fp+-8], %l2 sethi %hi(.L.strQ521), %l3 add

Hi, I configure llvm to generate code for alpha. I use a the following steps to generate code from the source files: 1) llvm-gcc -c main.c -emit-llvm main.bc 2) opt -load <library fo myPass> -myPass main.bc main.opt.bc 3) llc -march=alpha main.opt.bc -o main.S 4) alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu-as main.S -o main.o Most of the files that i compile run just fine. Suddenly, i have hit on a file

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

I need to maintain a log that contains information on files that are read / modified . I was suggested losf, but using lsof does not solve the problem as files opened/closed between two successive runs will always be missed. With reference to the stated need I have 2 Questions. 1) can data in the journal file be of any help to me ? if yes how, ? 2) can kjournald be used in some way ?

Hi, I'm trying to implement __builtin_setjmp / __builtin_longjmp for Sparc processors. I think I'm very close, but I can't work out how to issue BuildMI-type instructions to load the address of the recovery location (set in setjmp) into a register using the SETHI / OR combination. I can't see any equivalent code anywhere else in Sparc. I imagine this is similar if I try to make a