similar to: penalized quantile regression (rq.fit.lasso)

Dear R users: Recently, I learn to use penalized logistic regression. Two packages (penalized and glmnet) have the function of lasso. So I write these code. However, I got different results of coef. Can someone kindly explain. # lasso using penalized library(penalized) pena.fit2<-penalized(HRLNM,penalized=~CN+NoSus,lambda1=1,model="logistic",standardize=TRUE) pena.fit2

Hi everyone, We have been trying to construct a Lasso-cox model with discrete time. We conducted follow-up examinations on the epileptic attack after tumor surgical resection among glioma patients. The patients are followed-up in the 6/12/24 months after surgical resection, which makes the epilepsy-free time discrete (6/12/24 months). We calcluated many features from the T2-images

Hi, I couldn't find a package to fit a penalized (lasso/ridge) Gamma regression model. Does anybody know any? Thanks in advance, Lars. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users, Is there any package that I could use to perform Penalized Logistic Regression (i.e. Ridge/Lasso regularization) including also an offset term in the model (i.e. a variable with a known coefficient of 1 rather than an estimated coefficient)? I couldn't find any package that would allow using offset terms. Any guidance will help. Many thanks! Axel. [[alternative HTML version

I wish to estimate sparse causal networks from simulated time series data. Although there's some discussion about this problem in the literature (at least a few authors have used lasso and l(1,2) regularization to enforce sparsity in multivariate autoregressive models, e.g., http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~nkraemer/papers/grplasso_causality.pdf), I can't find any R packages with these

Hi, all, I am using the lars package for lasso estimate. So I get a lasso fit first: lassofit = lars(x,y,type ="lasso",normalize=T, intercept=T) Then I want to get coefficient with respect to a certain value of \lambda (the tuning parameter), I know lars has three mode options c("step", "fraction", "norm"), but can I use the \lambda value instead

Hi, Few days ago I posted a question to r-sig-finance, which I thought would be an easy one. To my surprise I have received no replies, which makes me think that it is either harder than I thought, or that it makes no sense. I am reposting the message (with some modifications) on the R-help in a hope to get some leads, suggestions for alternatives, etc. My apologies to those who had seen this on

Dear R user, I am looking for a code on double cross validation in LASSO , one for optimizing the parameter and other one is for MSEP. If any one have it, please foroward to me. I am using different package like LARS, chemometric etc. Thanks in advance Alex [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

This is a new version of glmnet, that incorporates some bug fixes and speedups. * a new convergence criterion which which offers 10x or more speedups for saturated fits (mainly effects logistic, Poisson and Cox) * one can now predict directly from a cv.object - see the help files for cv.glmnet and predict.cv.glmnet * other new methods are deviance() for "glmnet" and coef() for

glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for linear, two- and multi-class logistic regression models with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. Some of the features of glmnet: * by default it computes the path at 100 uniformly spaced (on the log scale) values of the

glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for linear, two- and multi-class logistic regression models with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. Some of the features of glmnet: * by default it computes the path at 100 uniformly spaced (on the log scale) values of the

Dear R list, From the lrm() binary logistic model we derived the G2 value or the likelihood-ratio chi-squared statistic given as L.R. model, in the output of the lrm(). How can this value be penalized for non-linearity (we used splines in the lrm function)? lrm.iRVI <- lrm(arson ~ rcs(iRVI,5), penalty=list(simple=10,nonlinear=100,nonlinear.interaction=4)) This didn’t work

glmnet_1.2 has been uploaded to CRAN. This is a major upgrade, with the following additional features: * poisson family, with dense or sparse x * Cox proportional hazards family, for dense x * wide range of cross-validation features. All models have several criteria for cross-validation. These include deviance, mean absolute error, misclassification error and "auc" for logistic or

glmnet_1.2 has been uploaded to CRAN. This is a major upgrade, with the following additional features: * poisson family, with dense or sparse x * Cox proportional hazards family, for dense x * wide range of cross-validation features. All models have several criteria for cross-validation. These include deviance, mean absolute error, misclassification error and "auc" for logistic or

Dear Robert, The differences have to do with diffent scaling defaults. lrm by default standardizes the covariates to unit sd before applying penalization. penalized by default does not do any standardization, but if asked standardizes on unit second central moment. In your example: x = c(-2, -2, -2, -2, -1, -1, -1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3) z = c(0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1) You

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

Hi All, I am using the package 'penalized' to perform a multiple regression on a dataset of 33 samples and 9 explanatory variables. The analysis appears to have performed as outlined and I have ended up with 4 explanatory variables and their respective regression coefficients. What I am struggling to understand is where do I get the variance explained information from and how do I

Dear all, I am using modified LARS algorithm (ref: The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties, Zou 2006) for adaptive lasso penalized linear regression. 1. w(j) <- |beta_ols(j)|^(-gamma) gamma>0 and j = 1,...,p 2. define x_new(j) <- x(j)*w(j) 3. apply LARS to solve modified lasso problem out.adalasso <- lars(X_new,y,type="lasso") or enet(X_new,

I'm using the package 'lars' in R with the following code: > library(lars) > set.seed(3) > n <- 1000 > x1 <- rnorm(n) > x2 <- x1+rnorm(n)*0.5 > x3 <- rnorm(n) > x4 <- rnorm(n) > x5 <- rexp(n) > y <- 5*x1 + 4*x2 + 2*x3 + 7*x4 + rnorm(n) > x <- cbind(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) > cor(cbind(y,x)) y x1 x2