similar to: USB passthrough: flexible configuration in XML-file needed

Hi, how can I define passthrough of all USB-slots to a guest with libvirt? With qemu it's very easy: # kvm -usb -usbdevice host:0.* -usbdevice host:1.* -usbdevice host:2.* -usbdevice host:3.* ... This configuration of the VM gets *all* 4 USB-Slots. Every time somewhat USB-device is plugged in the VM gets it. virt-install manpage offers: --host-device 001.003 USB by bus, device

Please help, I can't install Scientific Linux 6.3 with virt-manager because the key tab switches between kvm windows. I urgently need tab to go on in install process. see screenshot: http://aiai.de/foren/scientificLinux_tab.png Even in fullscreen mode tab changes to kvm window and not to button "continue" for installation process. please help, I want to install scientific linux as

Hello, I'd like to pass throug two identical devices to my VM. (using libvirt, guest is debian). For one device, it works like this: <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='usb'> <source> <vendor id='0x4fa'/> <product id='0x2490'/>

Hello, I re-post my question from some days ago, as I got no reply.. Please let me know, if my question is unclear, or if I can do anything to make answering it easier. I appreciate your help. Greetings, Hendrik Hello, I'd like to pass throug two identical devices to my VM. (using libvirt, guest is debian). For one device, it works like this: <hostdev

* Michael Mol schrieb: > Use your mouse to click inside the emulated terminal environment, and > your keyboard input will go there. thx. Where is the "emulated terminal environment"? The one I made screenshot of? http://aiai.de/foren/scientificLinux_tab.png I clicked anywhere inside, but anywhere the key "tab" changed between kvm windows. Eckard

this config does not work... why? <domain type='xen'> <name>marax.chao5.int</name> <uuid>72f8f7cf-d538-41cd-828a-9945b9157719</uuid> <memory unit='GiB'>32</memory> <currentMemory unit='GiB'>32</currentMemory> <vcpu placement='static'>16</vcpu> <os> <type

So, if I remove the hostdev element related to the USB device, running `lsusb` and `usb-devices` inside the container lists the proper device, but I do not see the appropriate character device bus for the Android device under /dev/bus/usb. We are not entirely sure that `lsusb` and `usb-devices` queries the appropriate location - it somehow gets information from the host, not the guest container,

I know these are mostly gamers but they have a lot of experience doing PCI pass though: https://discord.gg/du9ecG I have found them extremely helpful in the past doing libvirt PCI passthough. *Paul O'Rorke* On 2020-02-05 10:13 a.m., Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 2/4/20 1:04 AM, Christoph wrote: >> this config does not work... why? > > Without more details, I don't know why

Hello guys, this drives me insane. I am trying to pass romfile of my GPU for UEFI boot This is an error I am getting : [root@brutus-coreos opt]# virsh start winos1 error: Failed to start domain winos1 error: internal error: early end of file from monitor: possible problem: 2016-02-07T16:56:09.358285Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 05:32:28PM -0700, Filip Maj wrote: > Hi! > > First post, kind of a noobie. I've been working with LXC and libvirt for a > few months now. Trying to do some interesting things with containers and > Android devices :D > Here's my entire domain definition: > > <domain type='lxc'> > <name>oshi32134</name> >

I'd also like to point out that, when setting up a linux container with _just_ the lxc tools available in ubuntu, all that was needed to be done was whitelist the appropriate cgroups for the Android devices. The lxc tools seem to create the appropriate character devices when you detach/attach the Android device via USB, and the Android `adb` tool recognized the devices. So, a tangential

I'm using a bit of a different keyboard, the infinity ergodox [ https://input.club/devices/infinity-ergodox/]. It functions just fine as a keyboard on my host computer, but when I try to bind it to the guest, nothing seems to happen. lsusb gives its ID: Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub *Bus 005 Device 003: ID 1c11:b04d* Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux

WinXP ignores a USB passthrough! Hello, I need a persistent passthrough of a USB-device: Bus 001 Device 020: ID 04e6:5311 SCM Microsystems, Inc. I added <hostdev mode='subsy.... </hostdev> like this to xml file: [...] <on_crash>restart</on_crash> <devices> <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='usb' managed='no'>

To follow up on this a little bit, tail'ing kern.log while trying to get our little container up doesn't yield anything with apparmor complaining, so, unless I'm looking in the wrong spots for apparmor logs (which I don't think so, as I see other apparmor-related log entries in kern.log), I am not entirely sure this is an apparmor issue at this point. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:25

Can you see the USB device in the lxc? My answering assumes you cannot see the USB device in the container. If you can see it, please ignore my answer. According to my understanding, “hostdev mode='subsystem' “ is used with KVM only. We use this if we want to passthrough a device to a KVM virtual machine. After doing that, the host machine will lose control of the device. If container is

Hi folks, Has anyone encountered the following PCI passthrough error? error: internal error Process exited while reading console \ log output: char device redirected to /dev/pts/1 assigned_dev_pci_read: pread failed, ret = 0 errno = 2 It's produced after I've detached the PCI device from the base OS and have tried to start up the guest domain. To get to this point, I

Hi Guys, I am trying to add a Broadcom Physical NIC to a virtual Machine as Passthrough device. However I am getting following error. Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support passthrough of host PCI devices Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 88, in cb_wrapper

So I am reading through , and am wondering what is the difference between <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'> <hostdev> and <interface type='hostdev' managed='yes'> </interface> if I am trying to give full access to a NIC? Which one exposes more of the card? On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:13 PM Mauricio Tavares

Dear Fil, I am not sure if my answer can help you. I had ever asked a similar question to Daniel and I was using a thirty-party card. As a container uses a shared kernel with the host, so hostdev mode='subsystem' doesn't make sense. Maybe you can try to use hostdev mode='capabilities'. Please see http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsHostDevCaps Hope this helps Cheng

Ah, nevermind, think my last post may not have been entirely correct. We've spent some more time correlating the log output from our failed LXC startup via libvirt [1] with libvirt code from the 1.2.2 tag. Interestingly, the error we get back is different, and digging through the multitudes of logs, nothing comes up about 'operating not permitted' regarding the USB bus that I saw