similar to: Broadvoice Got SIP response 503 Service Unavailable

Dear Researches, I am using RF (in regression way) for analize several metrics extract from image. I am tuning RF setting a loop using different range of mtry, tree and nodesize using the lower value of MSE-OOB mtry from 1 to 5 nodesize from1 to 10 tree from 1 to 500 using this paper as refery Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007). Random Forest Models

Hello, i have some problems migrating a Windows 2000 PDC to a Debian GNU/Linux Samba Server, i want to migrate it to a LDAP backend.. but as i'm kind of newbie with ldap and samba migration stuff, i preffered to migrate it to tdbsam first and try it for a while, if everything works fine, then switch to a ldap backend. The problem is that Essential Windows Groups are automatically created, so

Hello everyone, I've suffering cut offs after 6 or 7 seconds a call is answered, incoming calls are working fine, but outgoing ones show the gollowing messages when are being dropped: [2013-05-15 12:55:14] WARNING[3569]: chan_sip.c:3641 retrans_pkt: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission ZjJkZjlkZWMyZTE4ZmY2NWZlZTExNDM1MDRhMTY4MTc. for seqno 2 (Critical Response) -- See

Hello, using asterisk 1.8.11.1 using realtime queues When trying to remove a queue member, I get the following : -- Executing [122 at from-TESTCORP:2] RemoveQueueMember("SIP/testcorp5-0000000c", "testcorpq1,SIP/testcorp7") in new stack WARNING[18788]: app_queue.c:5653 rqm_exec: Unable to remove interface from queue 'testcorpq1': 'SIP/testcorp7' is not a

Hi, I have seen a lot of unused xen-vncfb. Can they be kill manually ? Does "domid" run sequentially ? Will it be safe for me to execute "kill -9 12614 11905 10581 11037 11688" below ? Kindly advice. Thanks !! ================================================================= [root@machine xen]# ps -ef | grep -i dbn0 root 10581 1 0 10:02 ? 00:00:00

Dear Researches, I am using RF (in regression way) for analize several metrics extract from image. I am tuning RF setting a loop using different range of mtry, tree and nodesize using the lower value of MSE-OOB mtry from 1 to 5 nodesize from1 to 10 tree from 1 to 500 using this paper as refery Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007). Random Forest Models

Hi, I spent quite some time pulling my hair out and trying to figure out why NUT wasn't working properly with SSL enabled. I tried several approaches until I found something interesting. I'm using NUT 2.7.1 in Ubuntu Server 14.04 Trusty Tahr After properly configuring a self signed certificate with "certutil" from libnss3-tools, there was no way to get proper SSL connection

Hi guys, i spent about 5 hours now of finding out how to rubify/railify this query! Maybe someone of you can help me ;) class Menu < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :handle validates_presence_of :name, :sequence, :accesslevel, :defaultpage, :handle belongs_to :cmodule belongs_to :creator, :class_name => ''User'', :foreign_key =>

Just upgraded to 1.8, we use the multi lot parking feature by dialling *4. We are not getting the parking slot announcement being played to the person who parks the call, so it's impossible to tell which slot they've gone into. Could someone check our config? On Debian Squeeze using packages from http://packages.asterisk.org/debsqueeze main (Asterisk 1.8.11.1-1digium1~squeeze)

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2012-006 Product Asterisk Summary Remote Crash Vulnerability in SIP Channel Driver Nature of Advisory Remote Crash Susceptibility Remote Authenticated Sessions Severity

Hi folks, Following an upgrade to Debian wheezy, I'm now running Asterisk 1.8.13.1. As opposed to Asterisk 1.6.2.9 that I ran with squeeze, this version can support IPv6. However, it seems that I can't get it to support both IPv4 and IPv6 at the same time. For example, if in sip.conf I set the bindaddr variable to '::' it will only listen on IPv6 and none of my IPv4-only

In testing Asterisk 11, I've found that Asterisk doesn't seem to be sending BLF updates to SIP peers that have subscribed to a hint looking at a Custom device if that Custom device state is RINGING or RING_INUSE. All other states seem to be working correctly. The hint section of the dialplan is: [hints] exten => _3XX,hint,Custom:${EXTEN} Console shows the following for core show

======================================================================= "I take my children everywhere, but they always find their way back home." Robert Orben ======================================================================= Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.1. Changes since 4.1.17: --------------------- o

======================================================================= "I take my children everywhere, but they always find their way back home." Robert Orben ======================================================================= Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.1. Changes since 4.1.17: --------------------- o

Hello I got about 20 different people using 20 different PC''s in my Lan. Five of them should have unrestricted access to the internet any time of the day. Yet the rest of them should only have access at certain timeframes during the day. Two of them should have no access at all. I am well experienced in writing rules (for the rules file) that make all this possible, yet i was

The Wine development release 1.7.2 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Right-to-left text layout improvements. - NTLM and Negotiate authentication for RPC over HTTP. - More glyphs in the built-in Wingdings font. - Better system tray support in the Mac driver. - Activation context improvements. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the fifth release candidate of Samba 4.2. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.2 will be the next version of the Samba suite. IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SUPPORT END OF SAMBA 3