similar to: hack / spam/ probe /attack

We have a PRI from Telepacific. Asterisk 1.2 and a Sangoma A101 T1 card. Outgoing calls to certain toll-fee (8XX) numbers fail -- we hear ringing but the calls are never answered. All other calls, and most toll-free numbers are not affected. The numbers that are affected are all travel related companies (United Airlines, American Airlines, US Air, Starwood Hotels, etc.) we cannot connect to

Hi I have shorewall/iptables running on my server (pub) but access to localhost is blocked then I attemp to use ping localhost, telnet localhost 25, echo Hello | sendmail -v root@localhost. All these commands were run after using shorewall reset and creating the attached file. All these commands work with shorewall clear. My problem is I can''t email the root messages from (pub) to

I have a multi-isp configuration: CGCO 1 256 main $CGCOIF detect track,balance br-lan,tun0 IGS 2 512 main $IGSIF detect track,fallback br-lan,tun0 where I force SMTP out one of the connections: 512:P br-lan - tcp 25 But the effect of that of course is that if IGS goes down, SMTP will leak out of the CGCO connection. How can I prevent that? Cheers, b.

Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to

Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to

On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: >>>>> Kevin Stange, >>>>> It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or

I''m wondering if the following is possible under recent versions of shorewall: 1. We have several class-C networks from both UUNet and Internap, both of which are actually routed over a single inbound ethernet line from UUNet at our colocation facility: 204.176.148.0/23 and 216.52.83.0/24. This gives us a total of 3 class-C subnets. All packets for these three subnets would land on

Hi All, I use rather old Shorewall 3.2.6 and I know it''s no longer supported. I haven''t been updating the software because it works as intended until now. The problem is a simple DNAT rule. I actually have around 8 DNAT rules and they all work just fine. Here is what I want to achieve. I have a SMTP server in my LAN (lets say address 192.168.1.10). The SMTP daemon listens on

Hi, My firewall is a machine running Debian Squeeze with shorewall 4.4.11.6. /etc/shorewall/policy says this: loc $FW ACCEPT loc loc ACCEPT loc net ACCEPT $FW net ACCEPT $FW loc ACCEPT net all DROP # info all all REJECT

On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote: > Hi, > > whoever is able to unsubscribe addresses from the list: I am currently > getting lots of spam with nazi content over this mailing list. Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long- standing policy of samba.org lists is to allow public posting, we are between a rock and a hard place. This has

Hi, I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I downloaded STUN Server from http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz But I don't know how to install/configure it. And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario? Thanks in advance Wazb

On 01/26/2017 02:08 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/26/2017 09:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM

Alle, Does anyone know if there are any reputable repositories out there that contain packages for fuse/sshfs? Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu America, INC. E-mail: cwfox at us.fujitsu.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev; LLDB; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); Rafael Espíndola > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial > draft for an LLVM Code of

So I have two hosts that I want to move domU''s between, but they do not have any shared disk. I am willing to suffer some downtime to move the domU''s, but not a lot (like maybe the time needed to do a reboot, but certainly not the time required to copy the virtual disks over). This is what I did. WARNING: THIS IS A HACK AND YOU SHOULD BE CAREFUL DOING THIS. But it worked for me

--On Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:16 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > I don't yet really even want Dovecot to be too well known, it's not > ready yet. When 1.0 comes (this spring I hope) I'll start publicizing it > more. After that I should only need to add new features - existing ones > should be perfect and better than anyone else's ;) Just a

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 04:23, Kai Wang <kai.wang at sifive.com> wrote: > If we apply the type system pointed out by Renato, is the vector type <vscale x 1 x i16> legal? If we decide that <vscale x 1 x i16> is a fundamentally impossible type, does it contrary to the philosophy of LLVM IR as reasonably target-independent IR? I do not get the point of your argument. Hi Kai,

In the past little while, we've seen a wave of attacks on asterisk, via the provisioning. It goes something like this: A. scan for IP phones on the internet, either via spotting something on port 5060, or via the port 80 web interface for the phone. Or, use web sites that scan the internet, and classify the machines, to make your work shorter. B. Once you get into the web GUI,

Hi, what does the 'a' means in the win installer: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/flac/flac-1.1.4a.exe ? Is this to indicate alpha version or ...? I was not sure. And does the installer uses the same flac tools as in this zip file: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13478&package_id=12675? thanks in advance! -------------- next part --------------

From: root <root@localhost.localdomain> For direct upload, a suitable host must be in status 'Up' and belong to the same datacenter as the created disk. Added these criteria to the host search query. --- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py b/v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py index