similar to: How do I change kern.ipc.shmmax in FreeBSD 5.x automatically after reboot?

Hello all, I have a very annoying situation (at least at my end). I set up Samba 2.0.5 on a Digital UNIX 4.0F system sitting on a Compaq DS20 server with great success.... until recently. I set up three directory file shares with no problems, when I tried to set up a forth, quite a while after setting up the inital three, I tried to access it from a NT box, I got the message server not found,

Ole, Semaphores are a very cheap system resource in SunOS 4.1.x. You can easily bump up the max number using adb, without even recompiling the kernel. _seminfo: _seminfo+0 semmap 30 _seminfo+4 semmni 256 _seminfo+8 semmns 1024 _seminfo+0xc semmnu 1024 _seminfo+0x10 semmsl 1024 _seminfo+0x14 semopm 100 _seminfo+0x18 semume 256 _seminfo+0x1c semusz 2064

Ole.H.Nielsen@fysik.dtu.dk wrote: > > SAMBA grabs ALL available semaphores minus 1 on SunOS 4.1.3, > where the kernel has 60, see /usr/include/sys/sem.h: > #define SEMMNS 60 /* # of semaphores in system */ > > This is a MAJOR PROBLEM to us, since our backup software > (IBM ADSM) also needs available semaphores for the client > part to work. Hence we can

At 03:33 AM 11/01/1999 +1100, you wrote: > >From: Hai Nguyen <hhn1@yahoo.com> >To: samba-technical@samba.org, samba@samba.org >Subject: root did not create the semaphore >Message-ID: <19991030210628.3575.rocketmail@web705.mail.yahoo.com> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Hello, >I am new to samba and need assistance

Hello everyone, First of all, great job on the 4.8-R. We have been a long standing user of FreeBSD and are very happy with everything. Now my question. I am trying to stress test a new Dell PowerEdge server and find the limits of its hardware and my tuning. Here are the server stats: * 2x Xeon 2.8 with SMP compiled, hyperthreading NOT compiled in kernel * 4 GB of RAM, 8 GB of swap on Raid 1

Hi List, I'm tuning up a new database server and I'm finding very mixed information online. Here are the default shmmax and shmall from my new system cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax 4294967295 cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall 268435456 SHMALL is close enough to being SHMMAX / 16. Now, everything I'm finding online tells me that SHMALL = SHMMAX / PAGE_SIZE. default page size is 4096.

Fresh load of Centos6/64 from new ISO (downloaded 2 weeks ago?) and getting set up with PostgreSQL, one of the typical steps is to increase shmmax from its normal, conservative value (eg: 32 MB or something) to something far more aggressive. But in recent installs of CentOS 6, this value is generally huge, typically larger than the RAM installed on the machine! For example, fresh installs on

On 17/02/16 14:32, Michael H wrote: > Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as >> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:

we have following setup on sysctl.conf: kernel.sem = 256 32000 128 142 I tried to startup database and have error happen. I knew problem come from SEMMNS (32000) is not enough. Does anyone know how to calculate how many semaphores already use on system? Thanks. %ipcs -s ------ Semaphore Arrays -------- key semid owner perms nsems 0x963683ec 4751396 oracle

On 02/17/2016 07:08 AM, Michael H wrote: > On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what >> is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that >> needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list >> of updates. >> >> We released a new glibc yesterday for

Hi, Anybody have success with postgresql 8.1.3 on a new Intel OS X box? All hints welcome, please! I installed postgres 8.1.3 via darwinports, and everything is great until the initdb step. Initdb fails on shmget saying it couldn''t allocate enough memory (see below). So, I edited /etc/rc and increased kern.sysv.shmmax from 4194304 to 41943040 (4MB to 40MB) After reboot and

On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as >> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: >>

Hello again, on CentOS 6 / 64 bit what is please the best way to permanently increase the shared memory? I'd like to give shared_buffers = 4096MB to PostgreSQL 8.4 on my machine with 16 GB RAM, but I currently only have: # sysctl -A|grep shm kernel.shmmax = 33554432 kernel.shmall = 2097152 kernel.shmmni = 4096 and this produces the error in /var/lib/pgsql/pgstartup.log:

> > >Number: 16605 > >Category: kern > >Synopsis: samba 2.0.6 under 3.4-RELEASE can't open buffers Currently running 3.4-20000214-STABLE. Compiled samba 2.0.6 from /usr/ports; smbpasswd dies with a segmentation error but appears to complete writing the server SID and smbpasswd file (NT domain authentication works). Tried complete uninstall,

> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, > that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. > > Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as > Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-February/021705.html > > Here is a good link to figure out what to

Greetings, all: OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64 Kernel: 2.6.32-358.14.1 I could use some assistance with setting up pulse to load balance my dns servers. I've configured tcp and udp port 53 with the piranha gui, set up arptable rules on the real servers and added the virtual ip to the bond0 interface on the real servers, but I'm still having no luck in getting things going. A dig against the

Executing: ip tuntap add vpndrif mode tun return Keepalived errors show when tincd start: Jan 22 23:41:19 Keepalived_vrrp[1999]: Netlink: filter function error Jan 22 23:41:19 Keepalived_healthcheckers[1998]: Netlink: filter function error Jan 22 23:41:19 systemd-sysctl[23246]: Overwriting earlier assignment of kernel/shmmax in file '/etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf'. Jan 22 23:41:19

Hi All, I've been tuning a server recently and just today this has started to appear in my top/htop output. [root at db1 ~]# ps -aux | grep kernel root 1011 0.0 0.0 212048 4532 ? Ss 13:34 0:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow

Another question some of you may help me make decisions on. I've been doing some reading that indicates that having HT turned on in this dual xeon machine might actually slow down the computing process rather than speeding it up. I rebooted this a.m., and turned HT off, just prior to my main application run. One thing that might be of note, this application is using OMP for utilizing

I have an Asus A8V-MX motherboard with an AMD Athlong 64 X2 3800+ CPU and I'm trying to run powerd to keep it cooler/quieter/greener. I'm running -STABLE (6.1-RC) cvsup'ed a couple of days ago, with a kernel config that consists of the SMP sample plus an atapicam device. I'm loading the cpufreq.ko module in /boot/loader.conf. I've attached my dmesg output and sysctl -a