Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "weird bugs with mmap-ing via NFS"
2008 Jun 27
1
Performance of madvise / msync
Hi,
I'm using py-rrdtool 0.2.1 with rrdtool 1.3.0 under 7.0-STABLE, and
there's a couple of things about this new version of rrdtool that
hurt performance under FreeBSD, but apparently help on whatever they
tested on.
For every update, the database file is opened, mapped into memory,
madvise() is called, contents are modified, msync() is called, and
the file is unmapped and closed:
2003 Oct 02
1
another Dovecot problem
Hi All--
First, thanks to Timo for solving my last issue. I got dovecot up and
running on one of my machines, and it does exactly what I want. Now I'm
trying to install dovecot on an older box (glibc 2.0.7 Linux kernel
2.0.36), and encountering some problems:
-- firstly autoconf/automake does not seem to correctly deal with the
madvise function on this system. It detects that we don't
2010 Aug 09
3
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:17:27 -0700
Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>
> > With mmap() it is always possible to fully release the memory once
> > you are done using it.
>
> Sure. Is that the goal, though?
If goal is to reduce fragmentation, possibly. You
don't know if you have fragmentation
2010 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
2010/8/9 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:17:27 -0700
> Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>
>> > With mmap() it is always possible to fully release the memory once
>> > you are done using it.
>>
>> Sure. Is that the goal, though?
2008 Mar 15
1
Fix available for mmap on FreeBSD zfs
Saw this just come through for 8-current, 7-stable ought to have it in a week or so. I have not encountered the problem so I would not be able to judge if this fixes it.
Patch here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c.diff?r1=1.27;r2=1.28
pjd 2008-03-15 23:23:04 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
2016 Apr 12
2
Slow reading of large dovecot-uidlist files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
> On 12 April 2016 at 10:23, A.L.E.C <alec at alec.pl> wrote:
>
>> I don't know dovecot's code, but I suppose it uses uidlist file to get
>> mailbox statistics that it returns as EXISTS, RECENT, UNSEEN, UIDNEXT,
>> UIDVALIDITY, etc, which are required by IMAP standard. I
2019 Jan 04
2
virsh on mac os X
Mac OS X 10.14.2
VirtualBox 5.2.22 and 6.0.0
libvirt installed via homebrew
virsh -V
Virsh command line tool of libvirt 4.10.0
See web site at https://libvirt.org/
Compiled with support for:
Hypervisors: QEMU/KVM VMware VirtualBox ESX Test
Networking: Remote Bridging
Storage: Dir
Miscellaneous: Daemon Secrets Debug
brew services start libvirt
virsh -c vbox:///session list
error:
2023 Mar 10
3
Call for testing: OpenSSH 9.3
Hi,
OpenSSH 9.3p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing
on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release.
Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from
http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/
The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the
instructions at
2002 Feb 06
15
[Bug 105] scp protocol 2 over a hippi interface takes 6 times longer
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105
markus at openbsd.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-07 06:54 -------
could you please try this without scp? e.g.
2008 Jul 22
4
"sleeping without queue" ?
Hello!
My attempt to build openoffice.org-3 seems to be hanging. Pressing
Ctrl-T produces:
load: 0.11 cmd: tcsh 79759 [sleeping without queue] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 0k
(tcsh is used by OOo's build-script). What is this "sleeping without
queue" state, and why is process in it for so long?
This is an 4-CPU amd64 system with 4Gb of RAM. Only 16% of the swap is
currently in use and
2023 Feb 09
11
[Bug 3537] New: OpenSSH build failed
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3537
Bug ID: 3537
Summary: OpenSSH build failed
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: amd64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: Miscellaneous
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2004 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] benchmarking LLVM
Hi all
i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and
ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines.
1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM
team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout
and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in
comparison to GCC) on ackerman test on my AthlonXP.
But here:
2011 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Am 01.11.2011 18:04, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>> On the reasons why make-based builds are slow, Peter Miller has some
>> insight to offer:
>> http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/ .
>> I'm not sure how widely recognized that paper is. Maybe it's widely
>> known and today's
2011 Nov 02
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Hello John.
John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> writes:
[snip]
> I did not use CMake but the standard autoconf + Makefile build.
>
> Not sure if this helps, but here it is, for what it's worth.
Very interesting, thanks!
CMake introduces more parallelism and it would be great to see how much
impact it makes. If you can, please run the cmake build with -j32, just
to
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On 11/1/11 8:49 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Hello John.
>
> John Criswell<criswell at illinois.edu> writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I did not use CMake but the standard autoconf + Makefile build.
>>
>> Not sure if this helps, but here it is, for what it's worth.
> Very interesting, thanks!
>
> CMake introduces more parallelism and it would be great to
2017 Jul 24
4
[Bug 2747] New: Different notations for the same IP-address result in multiple entries in known_hosts
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2747
Bug ID: 2747
Summary: Different notations for the same IP-address result in
multiple entries in known_hosts
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 7.5p1
Hardware: Other
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
2020 Nov 06
12
[PATCH v3 0/6] mm/hmm/nouveau: add THP migration to migrate_vma_*
This series adds support for transparent huge page migration to
migrate_vma_*() and adds nouveau SVM and HMM selftests as consumers.
Earlier versions were posted previously [1] and [2].
The patches apply cleanly to the linux-mm 5.10.0-rc2 tree. There are a
lot of other THP patches being posted. I don't think there are any
semantic conflicts but there may be some merge conflicts depending on
2020 Jan 14
2
llvm-symbolizer memory usage
I work on a linux program with restricted RSS limits (a couple hundred MB),
and one of the things this program does is symbolication. Ideally, we'd
like to use llvm-symbolizer for this symbolication (because we get things
like function inlining that we can't get from cheaper symbolizers), but for
large binaries, the memory usage gets pretty huge.
Based on some memory profiling, it looks
2004 Oct 05
5
[LLVMdev] Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
Hi,
I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers.
Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37.
My environment:
-----------------
Windows 2000
Cygwin
$ uname -srom
CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686 Cygwin
-----------------
What do I have to download from
2007 May 02
3
the Surv function
Hi,
I'm trying to do a simple survival analysis on some data, and I'm having the
following problem (here's my code and the error message):
out <- Surv(fup,event=status)
Error in Surv(fup, event = status) : argument "time2" is missing, with no
default
>From reading the documentation, it seems that I should be able to simply
write: Surv(time1, event) if my data is