Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Inode Usage"
2014 May 29
3
[PATCH v2 0/2] UFS1/2 support series
From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
Change since v1:
* Fix bug on dentry structure (thank you specification; btw, sarcasm), and
consequently a bug on ufs_readdir.
* Add readlink support (applied tests for symlinks whose destionation path
were stored in blk pointers and the file itself).
* Several improvements.
Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to
2014 May 29
3
[PATCH 0/2] UFS1/2 support series
From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to push the doc to
the wiki as soon as the UFS support gets merged.
Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 on Syslinux - (usage/install)
-----
There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to
contact the author who replied:
"The name has always been
2014 May 27
2
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
> On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> >
> >
> > While going throug old posts found:
> >
> > Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho:
> > > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds
> the limit.
> > > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and
2013 Jul 12
2
[PATCH 001/001] Add UFS1/2 support to Extlinux installer.
It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers
and super block offsets.
Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas
UFS1 can't.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
---
extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++---
extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++
extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307
2013 Jul 22
1
[PATCH 1/1 v2] Add UFS1/2 support to Extlinux installer.
It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers
and super block offsets.
Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas
UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
---
extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++---
extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++
2010 Oct 24
1
Re: [Rails-core] Re: (Unable to start rails application) ruby scipt/server error
Rails application which i create manually like
rails new blog
and the content of the file "blog/config/boot.rb" are
require ''rubygems''
# Set up gems listed in the Gemfile.
gemfile = File.expand_path(''../../Gemfile'', __FILE__)
begin
ENV[''BUNDLE_GEMFILE''] = gemfile
require
2008 Mar 05
1
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer
My server just literally was brought to it's knees with this message
spewing on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 1203133, size: 4096
(blkno and size were varying)
Some searching says that this is or was a bug. Has this been fixed
yet? If so, what should I upgrade to? I'm currently running 6.3
Michael Grant
2008 Sep 01
3
bin/121684: : dump(8) frequently hangs
Any progress here? Does anyone know if this will be fixed in 7.1 latest,
or should we start looking for different backup solution (in this case I
would suggest to remove dump from the source tree - having a backup tool
that doesn't work is worse than having none). After upgrading we
basically cannot backup our servers.
Shouldn't this issue be on
2017 Mar 24
2
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: prevent uninitialized variable use
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:40:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Ladi Prosek <lprosek at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 23.03.2017 16:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> The latest gcc-7.0.1 snapshot reports a new warning:
> >>>
>
2017 Mar 24
2
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: prevent uninitialized variable use
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:40:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Ladi Prosek <lprosek at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 23.03.2017 16:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> The latest gcc-7.0.1 snapshot reports a new warning:
> >>>
>
2014 May 25
4
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
>
>
> While going throug old posts found:
>
> Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho:
> > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds
the limit.
> > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose
size may vary.
>
2015 Nov 15
4
[patch] 6.03 extlinux/main.c typos
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:14:36AM +0100, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> > diff U3 syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c
> > --- syslinux-6.03/extlinux/main.c Mon Oct 06 16:27:44 2014
> > +++ syslinux-6.03_typo/extlinux/main.c Fri Nov 13 02:29:56 2015
>
> patch seen
>
2013 Jul 19
0
[PATCH 001/001] Add UFS1/2 support to Extlinux installer.
On Fri, 12 Jul, at 08:31:27PM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote:
> @@ -575,7 +594,7 @@ bail:
> return 1;
> }
>
> -/* btrfs has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which
> +/* btrfs/ufs2 has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which
> is not managered by btrfs tree, so actually this is not installed as files.
> since the cow
2014 May 29
0
[PATCH 2/2] core/fs: Add support for Unix File system 1/2.
From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
It's already loading modules successfully, booting Linux, and both
UFS version 1 and 2 seem to be working correctly.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
---
core/fs/ufs/bmap.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
core/fs/ufs/ufs.c | 404 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2013 Jul 12
1
[PATCH 001/001] core/fs: Add support to Unix File system 1/2.
It's already loading modules successfully, and both UFS version 1 and 2
seems to be working correctly.
Special thanks to Paulo Alcantara and Matt Fleming for being always ready to help me
and give feedback.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com>
---
core/fs/ufs/bmap.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
core/fs/ufs/ufs.c | 404
2017 Mar 28
1
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: prevent uninitialized variable use
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:02:33PM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:40:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Ladi Prosek <lprosek at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Hildenbrand <david
2017 Mar 28
1
[PATCH] virtio_balloon: prevent uninitialized variable use
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:02:33PM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:40:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Ladi Prosek <lprosek at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:38 PM, David Hildenbrand <david
2012 Feb 11
3
9.0-RELEASE PV from scratch on XCP v1.1.0
Title: HOWTO-FreeBSD-on-XCP
Author: John D. "Trix" Farrar
Date: 2012-02-09
* The Challenge - ParaVirtualized FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE under XCP 1.1.0
The idea here is to create a PV FreeBSD VM under Xen Cloud Platform
(XCP) without starting with an HVM first. The documentation I''''ve
been able to find on-line is at least a year old and is mostly written
for Xen (under
2014 May 29
4
[PATCH 2/2] core/fs: Add support for Unix File system 1/2.
On 05/29/2014 07:36 AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:
>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote:
>>> +static int ufs_readlink(struct inode *inode, char *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + ufs_debug("ufs_readlink\n");
>>> + return inode->size;
>>> +}
2016 Feb 22
3
Dovecot Bulletin
It also got the bulletin out to new users without admin intervention.
Sent from Mobile
________________________________
From: Doug Hardie<mailto:bc979 at lafn.org>
Sent: ?2/?22/?2016 4:02
To: Dovecot Mailing List<mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>; Timo Sirainen<mailto:tss at iki.fi>
Cc: Kevin Kershner<mailto:cstkersh at outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Dovecot Bulletin
> On 20