similar to: refresh on change of link target

I just upgraded to 0.22.0 from 0.18.4 and I''m running into what I think are problems due to changes in scope rules. In my site.pp manifest, I have the following: import "classes/*" node nfsserver { include nfsserver } node webserver { include webserver } class cluster1_sites { website { "example.com": ...; "example2.com": ...; } } node

I''d like to create a component that takes different actions based on the classes associated with the node using the component. Is this possible? Here''s what I''m thinking. node www01 { include webserver website { "site1.com": aliases => ["www.site1.com", "test.site1.com"], username => www0001 } } node www02 { include

Puppet is failing to restart lighttpd using the Debian init script. Both the default action of stop/start and using the reload action, which basically does the same thing, fail. It seems to be a filehandle problem. Changing the execute method in service.rb to redirect stdout to /dev/null allows the daemon to restart. Otherwise, I end up with a zombie process and according to strace, ruby

Is there any security (or perhaps plans to add security) within the fileserver to verify that clients are only able to receive files specified in the manifests on the server? I''d like to distribute different Kerberos keytabs to different nodes such that nodes www01 and www02 can retrieve different files from nodes www03 and www04. Any ideas on how best to approach this problem? Thanks,

I just started playing with puppet. Unfortunately, it keeps crashing in a variety of places. I don''t have much experience with Ruby yet, so any tips in tracking down these problems would be appreciated. I''m using the Debian package 0.18.4-1. Here''s the output of a couple runs: www01:/home/cwarden# puppetd --verbose --onetime info: Caching configuration at

Thanks everyone for your quick responses to my questions. I''m trying to get templates working. I want to pull the template down from the puppet server, then use it. It looks like the require parameter is not being enforced when using the content parameter so the template can''t be found. This doesn''t work: file { "/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf" :

Should multiple requires still work? require => Package[[lighttpd, openssl]] It fails in 0.22.0 with err: Could not apply complete configuration: Could not retrieve dependency ''Package[lighttpdopenssl]'' at /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/webserver.pp:84 Christian

Hi, How should I handle the combinatorics when one config file must be built for a combination of possible classes? Take for example the amd automounter''s configuration file, which on Debian is found at /etc/am-utils/amd.conf. This is an INI style file which looks like: [fsname1] param1=foo param2=bar [fsname2] param1=baz param2=quag In my case I have one class of machines

I''m trying to set up my Rails development app for public access on OS X. I''m using the bundled lighttpd server. The first thing i tried to do is simply start lighttpd on port 80. When i set "server.port = 80" in lighttpd.conf i get the following error message after running ruby script/server: (network.c.265) can''t bind to port 80 Permission denied i

I have a lot of this going on: -- class lighttpd { import "lighttpd.pp" } class mysql { import "mysql.pp" } class nagios { import "nagios.pp" } class netdisco { import "netdisco.pp" } class nfs_server { import "nfs.pp"} class openldap { import "openldap.pp" } -- But my client is trying to realize all of these, even though I

Is it possible to override the provider parameter when describing a user? My Ruby skills are quite limited, but it appears that provider is always chosen based on the operating system. I would like to build a user provider that will be almost identical to the objectadd one, but uses cpu[1] to add users and groups to an ldap directory. Since the cpu commands basically mirror the native

I have an existing rails application on lighttpd and I am trrying to upgrade to mongrel for the enhanced scalability it offers. I am running mongrel 1.1.1, rails 1.2.5, lighttpd 1.4.13 and ruby 1.8.5 Everything is working great except request.remote_ip returns 127.0.0.1 or 192.168.0.102 (the internal network address of the server running lighty). I''ve seen some older posts about

Hi there, I''m currently developing a plugin to do authentication and authorisation. In the init.rb file of the plugin I have this code:- $:.unshift File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), ''lib'')) require ''open_advantage/authorisation'' ActionController::Base.send :include, OpenAdvantage::Authorisation and this is the skeleton of my

I followed hivelogic article on how to install Ror and Lighttpd on Mac OS. http://hivelogic.com/articles/2005/12/01/ruby_rails_lighttpd_mysql_tiger But I''m not sure I got Lighttpd in the right place. If I do "which lighttpd" and "lighttpd -v" I get answers from the terminal: /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd lighttpd-1.4.11 - a light and fast webserver But I

Hi guys/gals, I don''t know if anyone can answer this, and this post may belong in a VB.Net forum, but my question is more for lighttpd. I have a .net app that sends a HTTPWEBREQUEST to the webserver. Then my def saves this hit to a mysql db. In webrick, this works fine, but not in lighttpd. I was wondering if anyone has ever done this or does anyone know if lighttpd does not accept

This was a fun one to track down... I was trying to use the append_if_no_such_line script from the wiki and it was working fine EXCEPT when I threw a notify at it. The notify appears to completely ignore both unless and onlyif within the exec for some reason. If I put the same test in the actual command line, it works fine. Example: unless => "/bin/grep -Fqe ''$line''

Hi, I''m having difficulty getting ruby running via Lighttpd and fastcgi. My lighttpd.conf reads: server.port = 81 server.pid-file = "/tmp/test_lighttpd.pid" server.modules = ( "mod_redirect", "mod_access", "mod_fastcgi", "mod_accesslog", "mod_simple_vhost" ) server.document-root = "/tmp/mis/public"

Hello List, We are using puppet to manage a growing number of Debian Etch based servers (currently 70). Since upgrading to 0.22.4 we encountered a problem when services do not restarted on puppets request. For example the Nagios remote plugin executor daemon (nrpe). It''s running daemonized and its confiugration is located in /etc/nagios/nrpe.cfg. This file is managed through puppet

I have a webserver that''s happily running apache2 and PHP. I''d like to deploy a site that I wrote using RoR on that same server but read that there might be some conflicts with PHP and RoR trying to access the same MySQL database. How real are those conflicts? Could I mess up my running PHP site if I install mod_ruby and try to use Apache2? Would I be better off

I just upgraded to puppet 0.20.1 from 0.18.4 (both using the debian packages). After the upgrade, I''m getting the following error: err: Could not find type "remotefile" in file /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/kerberos.pp at line 47 Here''s the where the error is occuring: service { nfs-common: ensure => running, hasstatus => true, subscribe