similar to: MSIX failure

I sent an email out to freebsd-net without a response, soo this is my last attempt at getting any assistance here. I have a QLE3142-CU-CK (rebranded NetXen NX3-20GCU w/ NX3031 chipset) with no driver support in *BSD from anything I saw. I came across solaris's ntxn driver which seems to work appropriately but I have no use for solaris as a host o/s. Naturally I'll attempt at trying to get

Hello everybody Unfortunately my problem still doesn't have any solution. But I have an interesting observation. The gateway freezes very quickly, if torrent client programs are running on workstations. I assume the cause of the problem consists in many number of TCP/IP connections that torrent client establishes. Any ideas? Maybe I can tune somehow a TCP/IP via kernel, sysctl or pf settings?

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo tree. If anyone sees the obvious solution here, I'd love to figure it out. found-> vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165f, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=2, slot=0, func=1 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1

Hello all. I have a supermicro 16 bay box with a LSI 9211-8i card. We use it for temp data storage, and we wanted to try the l4z compression. After updating the source tree to r247839: and doing a make buildworld cycle all works fine. But at boot time we get some warnings. make_dev_physpath_alias: WARNING - Unable to alias gptid/281951f4-a996-11e1-83eb-00259061b51a to enc at

hi, I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: ... ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.15> port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54 ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 ix1: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE

I finally got a 10G card that is recognized by FreeBSD (9.1-stable): ... ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.4.8> port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: RX Descriptors exceed system mbuf max, using default instead! ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54

Hi, We're having some trouble with detection of a couple of Sil3124 SATA controller cards on newer motherboard and processor combos. Specifically, we're running a Supermicro X9SCM-F motherboard (latest BIOS) and Intel E3-1220v2 CPU. What we're seeing: - Syba Sil3124 PCIe cards are only being detected when installed in PCIe Slot 4 -- The motherboard documentation shows that this

Just installed centos 6.2. I run and ifconfig -a I see and em1 em2 and lo interface. If I go to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, I don't see an ifcfg-eth0. If I run ifup eth0 it comes back with "Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization". Anybody have a clue? Thanks in advance.

I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE over Asus P5Q motherboard. Such board comes with an nic requiring age0 driver. When the nic is under load, such trasferring big amount of data over gigabit connection (let's say some gigabyte backups), the computer hangs, sometimes with panic, sometimes freezing. Before that i was using an Intel nic with em0 driver and 7.0-Stable#2.. and that

has anyone played with the securelevel variable in the kernel and the immutable flags in the ext2 file system? The only way I have found to change the flag is by patching sched.c from int securelevel=0 to int securelevel=1 The sysctrl code seems to allow the setting of the flag only by init (PID=1) and only upwards (0->1, etc). The problem is that I haven''t found a way to get init

I've read about securelevel in the mailing list archive, and found some pitfalls (and seems to me to be discarded soon). But According to me, the following configuration should offer a good security: - mount root fs read only at boot; - set securelevel to 3; - do not permit to unmount/remount roots fs read-write (now it is possible by means of "mount -uw /"); - the only way to make

> > systems which no longer seem to have this. This file contained an archive of > > the trojan''s that were inserted into the compromised system - does anybody know > > what is in these trojans? > > Check the Linux RootKit ... (LRK).. > > Typically LRK to use config-files.. (and typically LRK-users to place > files in /dev.. find /dev -type f | grep -v

running (4-Stable) Hi, short form question: how does one run XDM under securelevel>0 ? long version: i've searched for an answer on how to run Xfree/Xorg at a securelevel the X server likes access to /dev/io and some other resources but is not granted access after security is switched on. one way of doing it seems to be to start it before setting the securelevel, but then is doesnt

I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a "make installworld" I end up with install: rename: /lib/INS@aTxk to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-98:02 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: security compromise via mmap Category: core Module: kernel Announced: 1998-03-12 Affects:

I'm running 7.0-RELEASE-i386 on Jetway's NC92-N230 mainboard. The board has one integrated RTL8168/8111 gigabit NIC as well as an expansion board with three RTL8168/8111 NICs. Why would the three NICs work while the onboard NIC does not? none2@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device

Thanks for the module, I think its a good idea to commit it to FreeBSD for a few reasons: 1) Some folks just prefer more static kernels. 2) Securelevel is a great thing, but can be a pain to do upgrades around remotely. [A lot of folks use FreeBSD simply because its a breeze to run remotely]. 3) Until someone writes code to add modules to a kernel via /dev/mem and releases it to the script