similar to: what is the default file-max in /proc

This patch to the balloon driver eliminates the need for a user-space program to slosh memory between domains and xen. This uses a proc file at /proc/xen/memory_target. When read it reports memory the domain owns in bytes. Writing a new value to the memory_target proc file will cause the domain to exchange memory with xen to reach the target. A xenolinux domain cannot grow bigger than it was

I just setup a new laptop with - Xen-unstable (http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.git), installed via "make xen", "make install-xen", "make tools", "make install-tools" - dom0 kernel 2.6.30-rc6-tip (from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git, changed to bleeding edge via "git checkout origin/xen-tip/next b xen tip/next

Hello, We had a problem with our disk controller that required a reboot. 2 of our OSTs remounted and went through the recovery window but clients hang trying to access them. Also /proc/fs/lustre/obdfilter/$UUID/ is empty for that OST UUID. LDISKFS FS on dm-5, internal journal on dm-5:8 LDISKFS-fs: delayed allocation enabled LDISKFS-fs: file extents enabled LDISKFS-fs: mballoc enabled

Hello there! How to configure samba (2.2.5) to let windows clients access the server's /proc filesystem? I already removed any "dont descent /proc" statement from config file. Windows clients are able to list files in /proc but their size is 0 Bytes and the files are empty when opened... Any hints? Reguards, Alexander

Here is the setup: Dell 6250, Quad Proc P3 500Mhz. Digium Single Span T1 card. System has 71 sip peers/users. All calls are G729; we have 10 licenses. All calls follow this path: UA -> Asterisk -> Digium PRI -> Class4/5 switch. The switch dictates if it should go out local PRI for local termination or out PRI to our Cisco AS5300 for LD termination. Our biggest problem is echo.

Hi! This is now fixed in main, see https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f359c6ee179aad5e077711c188fc8422106cbead%5E..d93c31d51b05d43eaa6eeef9cdc0f7a4157f7d0e.patch Aki > On 26/03/2023 17:56 EEST Elisamuel Resto <sam at samresto.dev> wrote: > > > Aki, > > Thank you! > > Regards, > -Sam > > > On Mar 26, 2023, at 04:00, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

Hi, According to virsh capabilities I only have the following cpu features: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>IvyBridge-IBRS</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <microcode version='32'/> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> <feature name='ds'/>

I get this during booting? Anyone have any ideas? I'm running redhat 7.1 w/ kernel 2.4.9-6 and the wine version from the powertools cd. Latest version of wine does it also. I get this error when installing from redhat powertools too: "execution of %post scriplet from wine 20010131-3 failed, exit status1" but it installs and seems to work... just my windows service doesn't

--- appliance/init | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index f4f6333..5d43c71 100755 --- a/appliance/init +++ b/appliance/init @@ -75,21 +75,6 @@ $UDEVD --daemon #--debug udevadm trigger udevadm settle --timeout=600 -if grep -sq selinux=1 /proc/cmdline; then - mount -t selinuxfs none

Hello, Writing to get some insight as to how I might rid myself of a the pesky error message on the subject. Every binary throws out that error, every LMTP delivery... basically every time any dovecot binary is executed. I am unsure if this is configuration related or not, but intuition says it is an issue with a kernel feature or compiler issue. I saw the error message in the source code

On Tuesday 22 March 2016 19:05:21 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > appliance/init | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init > index f4f6333..5d43c71 100755 > --- a/appliance/init > +++ b/appliance/init > @@ -75,21 +75,6 @@ $UDEVD --daemon #--debug > udevadm trigger >

Hi all > Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 > and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation > in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of > memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong. yes, it's occured time to time on our installations. Centos 7.2 + libvirt 1.2.18 and

Dear Developers First of all I would love to thank you for a nice tool I had been using rsync within backuppc project to backup my remote hosts. It had been working fine until the moment (as I think) whenever I moved RAID to another box and now the source directory (/raid/research) is now actually NFS mounted. Now backup (rsync process) stalls and sleeps indefinitely On the backup server:

Hi! This requires a code change, which is currently in progress. It does require you to patch Dovecot yourself if you want to use it, once it's ready. Aki > On 26/03/2023 05:22 EEST Elisamuel Resto Donate <sam at samresto.dev> wrote: > > > Hi, > > At this point I have resorted to add the error message to be ignored by the syslog daemon to at least keep it out of

Hi all, this patch include in /proc/mount the info about which subvolume is mounted and which metadata_ratio value is used. $ cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 [...] /dev/sdc /tmp/t4 btrfs rw,relatime,metadata_ratio=20 0 0 /dev/sdc /mnt/btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,degraded,metadata_ratio=20,subvol=snap- of-root 0 0 BR G.Baroncelli commit 3d7ea7bbd70a66c4d0f369b2879c503b722e8834 Author:

Aki, Thank you! Regards, -Sam > On Mar 26, 2023, at 04:00, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > ?Hi! > > This requires a code change, which is currently in progress. It does require you to patch Dovecot yourself if you want to use it, once it's ready. > > Aki > >> On 26/03/2023 05:22 EEST Elisamuel Resto Donate <sam at

HI all, >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: chris.mason@fusionio.com >Data: 20/06/2012 1.49 >A: "H. Peter Anvin"<hpa@zytor.com> >Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org"<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> >Ogg: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo > >> b. Are there better ways (walking the tree using BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH?) >> to accomplish

Hello I was copying some files from one server to other, that I relized the total file size ( sum of all files ) in one server is a bit more than the one that copied from ( about 6 when I do du -s ) individual file sizes are identical, when I do one by one file comparison, but the sum is different. is there any more accurate way to make sure of integrity of the file. ( other than pgp or

We run unprivileged lxc containers (libvirt based) with next config: ... <idmap> <uid start='0' target='65535' count='65535'/> <gid start='0' target='65535' count='65535'/> </idmap> ... <devices> <emulator>/usr/libexec/libvirt_lxc</emulator> <filesystem type='mount'

Now reporduced with 100% 1) create contrainer with memory limit 1Gb 2) run inside simple memory test allocator: #include <malloc.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <memory.h> #define MB 1024 * 1024 int main() { int total = 0; while (1) { void *p = malloc( 100*MB ); memset(p,0, 100*MB ); total = total + 100; printf("Alloc %d Mb\n",total); sleep(1);