similar to: SVN commit hook checks

Hello, I've been asked to test this, can anyone help me? The platform I would like to test on: - Lenny/amd64 - Intel VT-i (Xen HVM support) I've looked over the various threads and wiki pages on the issue and I thought I would try to summarise it more concisely: dom0 (32 bit): - regular install using Lenny CD, Debian Installer, i386 - install the kernel package from etch,

Hi puppet masters, while working on my site I came across a requirement that might be helpful for others as well.... With the aim of confining human errors as much as possible, I thought that it would be nice to have yum repositories disabled so that specific repositories could be enabled for certain packages. This is easily implementable via command-line, but I found that the

Has the component/type defaults syntax changed for 0.22.x? I have a component: <snip> define remotefile($owner=root, $group=root, $mode, $source, $backup=false, $recurse=false, $groupname="default") { file { $name: mode => $mode, owner => $owner, group => $group, backup => $backup,

Hi, I just upgraded to puppet 0.20.0 today after a short time playing with 0.19.3. The docs say to use the uppercase form for types but that seems to break for me. When I updated the remotefile function to use the new way, the puppet clients complain about objects not being found. For example: ----- OLD WAY (works, just with deprecations) ----- define remotefile (...) { file { $name :

Has anyone done rollbacks with puppet? The story goes that last night I pushed a change out, which intentionally changed the way certain services where managed. The change involved pushing out a few files, cronjobs, etc., which was okay until it was discovered there was a bug with the service. My configurations are kept in subversion and rolling back to a previous configuration would have

I testing Puppet 0.19.3. If we decide to use it, we''d deploy it across several thousand hosts. The method described for creating client certificates described in the documentation - running "puppetd --server <server> --waitforcert 60 --test" and "puppetca --sign <client>" - is not practical for our installation. I''ve tried creating

Hi! I found a similar problem in an user maillist about my problem, but didnt work here. Im using a CentOS 5.2, with a Xen 2.6.18 kernel and a compiled Drbd 8. So, a load a ocfs2 module and use the mkfs.ocfs2 successfully with /dev/drbd0 But, when i try to mount it a take this log: # mount.ocfs2 /dev/drbd0 /mnt mount.ocfs2: I/O error on channel while trying to join the group # tail

Ok, so I''m obviously doing something wrong here. This is running puppet 0.22.2 on a centos 4 update 4 box. When I try running this test - mount { bigdisk: ensure => mounted, device => ''bigserver:/bigdisk'', fstype => nfs, name => ''/bigdisk'', dump => "0", pass => "0", options =>

I'm breaking this out from LLVM asserts thread. Here are all the assertions in APInt I consider should be recoverable: APInt::APInt: bitwidth too small Null pointer detected! APInt::getBitsNeeded: Invalid string length string is only a minus! Invalid radix APInt::fromString: Radix should be 2, 8, 10, or 16! Invalid string length string is only a minus Insufficient bit width Invalid digit in

Facter has the feature that it will turn any environment variable named FACTER_* into a fact. I can do this on the commandline no problem, but when I attempt this in puppet it seems to ignore that parts. Is anyone else seeing this? (Is this expected behavior?) I don''t see a ticket or a mail thread on it - though my searching powers have been weak the last couple of weeks... Thanks,

I''m trying to come up with a way to manage /etc/puppet on the Puppet server from my workstation. My idea was to place all of /etc/puppet into subversion, check it out to my workstation, commit via ssh, and then use a post-commit to update /etc/puppet. That way any time I made a change in /etc/puppet it would be immediately updated and ready for the next puppetd run. Problem is the

Hi, Given the recent increase in SIP brute force attacks, I've had a little idea. The standard scripts that block after X attempts work well to prevent you actually being compromised, but once you've been 'found' then the attempts seem to keep coming for quite some time. Older versions of sipvicious don't appear to stop once you start sending un-reachables (or straight

On Aug 19, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I'm breaking this out from LLVM asserts thread. Here are all the > assertions in APInt I consider should be recoverable: > > APInt::APInt: > bitwidth too small > Null pointer detected! Hi Eric, As we discussed on IRC, I don't think there is any reason for the implementation of these methods to check these

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > As we discussed on IRC, I don't think there is any reason for the > implementation of these methods to check these invariants.  These are clear > API invariants that the caller can check if needbe.  Making the > implementation check these will slow down clients which are known to be well >

Dear R-experts, I still have problems with the reading of a matrix. Input: matrixData6.txt A-Paar B-Paar C-Paar D-Paar E-Paar A 1 3 5 7 9 B 2 4 6 8 10 R-commands: y=read.table(file="Z:/Software/R-Programme/matrixData6.txt") y Result: A.Paar B.Paar C.Paar D.Paar E.Paar A 1 3 5 7 9 B 2 4 6 8 10 If you look into the txt-file

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2006-April/000462.html The above url hows 3.0_3.0.2+hg9646-1 being accepted, but http://pkg-xen.alioth.debian.org/ shows 3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1 as the latest .deb, and https://alioth.debian.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=30894 shows 3.0.2+hg9629 patches. Where can I get 3.0_3.0.2+hg9646-1? -- Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>

Hi >i have this data > X [1] 5.79 1579.52 2323.70 68.85 426.07 110.29 108.29 1067.60 17.05 22.66 [11] 21.02 175.88 139.07 144.12 20.46 43.40 194.90 47.30 7.74 0.40 [21] 82.85 9.88 89.29 215.10 1.75 0.79 15.93 3.91 0.27 0.69 [31] 100.58 27.80 13.95 53.24 0.96 4.15 0.19 0.78 8.01 31.75 [41] 7.35 6.50

hi, i've made *some* benchmarks, i plan to do more. benchmarks requests welcome, e.g. "please test this...with that.." https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/benchmark.html but only in https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/prinz are results right now. I hope this is helpful. Thanks, Christian.

We have installed RedHat LINUX Server 7.0 and Samba 2.0. We tried connect the Linux Server with other Windows 95/98 machines using Samba. We modify the smb.conf file by seeing the instructions in samba docs,also we modify the Windows 95/98 machine's TCP/IP, Micorsoft Client for networks. We start samba in Linux machine,its working fine. Now we want a detailed step by step information knowing

Hello to everybody, it?s possible run 32 bits program on a 64 bits CentOS core?? --------------------------------- Correo Yahoo! Comprueba qu? es nuevo, aqu? http://correo.yahoo.es -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051122/d38637c7/attachment-0005.html>