Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "upgrading form 4.2 to 5.x"
2004 Feb 15
6
Rooted system
Howyd all? Seems that I have been routed. Possibly
by a physical B&E, but who knows? Probably some
of you do.... anyways, some politically sensitive
email was deleted from a user account and the
line
low -tr &
inserted into my .xinitrc .
Duncan (Dhu) Campbell
2004 Feb 03
1
Re: Possible compromise ?
that only works when you are presuming that the host was not hacked already
because i would clear those logs when i hacked a system :)
but indeed it's a try,
If you remain unsure, it is best to reinstall the system to be sure that a
fresh
and newly updated (yeah update it when installed :)) system is not
compromised at that
time..
loads of work, but it gives you some relief to know that
2004 Jun 12
2
Hacked or not appendice
Hi all again,
I must add, there are no log entries after June 9, 2004. "LKM" message first
apeared June 8, 2004, after this day, there is nothing in /var/messages,
/var/security .....
How could I look for suspicious LKM module ? How could I find it, if the
machine is hacked and I can not believe "ls", "find" etc. commands ?
Peter Rosa
2005 Aug 21
1
Security warning with sshd
In my recent security email, I got the following errors:
cantona.dnswatchdog.com login failures:
Aug 20 02:37:19 cantona sshd[9444]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted
Aug 20 04:30:42 cantona sshd[16142]: fatal: Write failed: Operation
not permitted
Aug 20 21:21:51 cantona sshd[45716]: fatal: Write failed: Operation
not permitted
So three questions: What is it? Should I be worried?
2004 May 17
4
Multi-User Security
Hello list.
I would like to get your opinion on what is a safe multi-user environment.
The scenario:
We would like to offer to some customers of ours some sort of network
backup/archive. They would put daily or weekly backups from their local
machine on our server using rsync and SSH. Therefore, they all have a user
account on our server. However, we must ensure that they would absolutely
not be
2006 Jul 28
2
Ruby vulnerability?
Hi,
FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
soon?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694
cheers,
-- Joel Hatton --
Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national
2005 Apr 29
6
IPFW disconnections and resets
Hi,
I am using IPFW on FreeBSD 4.11
I am facing two problems:
- SSH sessions timeout after a while
- When I run "/sbin/ipfw -q -f flush" in the rules script all connection
get reset (and I am thrown out of the box).
Is this standard functioning of ipfw or do I need to change any
configuration?
Thanks,
Siddhartha
2006 Sep 13
2
ports / www/linux-seamonkey / flashplugin vulnerability
Hi!
Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html
isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)?
Bye
Arne
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
2007 Aug 01
3
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1)
Category: contrib
Module: tcpdump
Announced:
2007 Aug 01
3
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1)
Category: contrib
Module: tcpdump
Announced:
2007 Jan 30
1
What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ?
http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.4
SECURITY ADVISORIES
* CVE-2006-4095
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#915404
NISCC 172003
* CVE-2006-4096
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#697164
NISCC 172003
* CAN-2005-0034
NISCC-UNIRAS 20050125-00059
CERT Vulnerability Note VU#938617
[ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich
2007 Sep 28
2
OpenSSL bufffer overflow
I did not see any commits to the OpenSSL code, recently; is anybody
going to commit the fix?
See http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480855/30/0 for details ...
Regards, STefan
2007 Jan 10
1
Recent vulnerabilities in xorg-server
Colin, good day!
Spotted two patches for x11-servers/xorg-server port: see entries for
x11r6.9.0-dbe-render.diff and x11r6.9.0-cidfonts.diff at
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R6.9.0/patches/index.html
Seems like they are not applied to the xorg-server-6.9.0_5. May be
it should be added to the VuXML document?
There is a ports/107733 issue that incorporates these patches. May
be you
2004 Jan 23
0
FW: ipfw + named problem
forgot this addr.
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Remko Lodder [mailto:remko@elvandar.org]
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 januari 2004 10:53
Aan: Nick Twaddell
Onderwerp: RE: [Freebsd-security] ipfw + named problem
did you tcpdump the packets so that you can
2018 Jun 29
7
Sharing Mailbox between users using IMAP
Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>:
Hi Remko,
> Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in
> someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the
> info@ credentials with the other
> people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc.
That is self-evident and it is not a problem.
I can't understand what you
2004 Feb 03
0
Re: Possible compromise ?
Yeah but if you are uncertain about your own box my VERY STRONG advise
is that you reinstall. IF your host is indeed owned, then you are a lot
further away then just reinstalling, god knows what issues can arrise
when a cracker exploits the system to do bogus tasks..
Then i say: Too bad for your time, sorry but it's like that
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
2007 Dec 12
2
Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution...
...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015"
http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/
============================================================================
samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 <http://www.freshports.org/net/>net<http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount> <http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_all&method=match&query=net/samba3>=220
FORBIDDEN:
2018 Jun 07
4
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Still not quite right for me.
Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error:
dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds
(last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL))
Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout
during state=sync_mails (send=mails recv=recv_last_common)
I'm not sure if there is an underlying replication error
2004 Mar 02
1
Re: FreeBSD Security AdvisoryFreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp
yes unless you use the version as of :> 2004-03-02 17:24:46
UTC (RELENG_5_2, 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1)
check it out with uname -a
if it does not say -p1
it affects you.
My guess, you are affected :)
cheers
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: