similar to: My details

-- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:44:37 -0400 From: taroon-beta-list at redhat.com To: taroon-beta-list at redhat.com Subject: Announcing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Beta 1 Public Availability Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (version 4)

Just in case there is one person on this list that isn't aware... and so it begins... Craig -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: nahant-list at redhat.com > Reply-To: nahant-list at redhat.com > To: nahant-list at redhat.com > Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 Availability Announcement > Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:32:51 -0500 > > Red Hat is pleased to

The RHEL links for Release Notes for CentOS-6, CentOS-5, and Centos-4 on wiki.c.o/Download are reached courtesy of redirects on the RedHat.com server. The same is true for the Red Hat's Documentation link in the Release Notes section and the Red Hat's Errata Support Policy link in the End-Of-Life section. It was very generous of the Red Hat project participant who last worked on the

just in case anyone isn't already aware... aren't you guys finished with CentOS 4.3 yet? ;-) thanks for all your efforts...I'm just kidding of course. Craig -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: taroon-list at redhat.com > Reply-To: taroon-list at redhat.com > To: taroon-list at redhat.com > Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 7 Availability Announcement

It's official -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 1 Availability Announcement Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 1 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 4) for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES (v. 4) for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote: >> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN >>>> we could properly publish that data in some way. >>> >>>

Any word on this update for CentOS 6? This one seems pretty bad if it's a remote exploit. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Red Hat Errata Notifications <errata at redhat.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM

I was trying to stay out of this thread, but the reply was complete and utter nonsense... On 25/07/2023 01:24, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-24 13:47, frank saporito wrote: >> Let me know if you disagree with any of these statements: >> >> 1. Red Hat is no longer posting source code to git.centos.org. > > > Correct.? Red Hat used to publish a de-branded

This post appeared on another forum: Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is implementing? Red Hat has changed the way it distributes Enterprise Linux kernel code in an effort to prevent Oracle and Novell from stealing its customers, making it more difficult for these competitors to understand which patches have been applied where. Some have speculated that the change

On 2023-07-25 04:25, Phil Perry wrote: > Nonsense. For years Red Hat freely published the complete RHEL SRPMs > to their public ftp server. No, they didn't.? Take a look at the planning guide diagrams, here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata A RHEL major release isn't a single lifecycle.? It's a sequence of minor releases, many of which have 4 year

--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- ************************************************************ M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! ************************************************************ You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/Sobig.f@MM (ED). The message was sent on 8/20/2003 11:39:38 PM. The subject of the message was: Your

Cray is hiring! Cray is looking for talented and motivated engineers to help develop compilers and other programming tools for state-of-the-art supercomputing platforms. Cray is a leader in designing and implementing supercomputers using future custom and commodity architectures. As system complexity grows, programming tools are a critical part of the Cray ecosystem to provide excellent

On 07/30/2015 04:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:

Hi, Next week at the developers meeting, I'm chairing a BoF session on improving our performance tracking and benchmarking infrastructure. I'd like to make the most out of the 45 minute slot. Therefore, I'd like to start the discussion a bit earlier here, giving everyone who can't come to the BoF a chance to put in their 2 cents. At the same time, I hope this will also give me a

Red Hat's Security policy for Production 3 Phase of the Life Cycle for EL5 is that they will only release "Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available. Other errata advisories may be delivered as appropriate." https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/#Production_3_Phase

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > > > without actually including

On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote: > Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html For a while now the "upstream details" pointed to in messages from centos-announce have been saying: Attention: RHN Hosted will reach the end of its service life on July 31, 2017. Customers will be required to migrate

While update 3 was released last week, it looks like there are 40 or so packages updated. I dunno about squid, it is listed on http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html but the changelog is from October 2005 (unless it is an rhel only bug). audit-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-devel-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm bootparamd-0.17-21.RHEL4.i386.rpm

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > > without actually including the LLVM sources? If they do include the > > > sources, they may fix the bug locally, especially if

To squelch the questions (related to the changing content on www.centos.org), I decided this needs to be published. The CentOS Team has been contacted by representatives of Red Hat's hired legal team regarding the use of Red Hat Trademarks on www.centos.org. (Full Email follows.) While the CentOS team feels we are using Red Hat's marks in a fair and legal manner, we have no choice