similar to: rl(4) is broken in STABLE

Greetings, I cvsup'd and rebuilt a FreeBSD 4.8 system last Friday after receiving the realpath security advisory. The machine is remote and the NIC uses the rl driver. After booting the machine I had no network connectivity. The person at the remote site says the boot was normal and he could see that the NIC was properly configured but he could not ping it and I could not login. We booted

Hi ! Today I have noticed some modified index.html files on some of our vhosts. Is it Apache related ? Does anyone know about this ? The content is following: IR4DEX ownz you FreeBSD - contato: ir4dex@hotmail.com -Miha

Hi ! Today I have noticed some modified index.html files on some of our vhosts. Is it Apache related ? Does anyone know about this ? The content is following: IR4DEX ownz you FreeBSD - contato: ir4dex@hotmail.com -Miha

Hi, I upgraded my 7.1-RELEASE system to RELENG_7 yesterday and after booting, re0 works for only a short time, then gives "re0: PHY read failed" over and over. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to debug? Thanks, Steve

You've probably already seen the latest sendmail vulnerability. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010287.html I believe you can apply the following patch to any of the security branches: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/contrib/sendmail/src/parseaddr.c.diff?r1=1.1.1.17&r2=1.1.1.18 Download the patch and: # cd /usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch #

You've probably already seen the latest sendmail vulnerability. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010287.html I believe you can apply the following patch to any of the security branches: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/contrib/sendmail/src/parseaddr.c.diff?r1=1.1.1.17&r2=1.1.1.18 Download the patch and: # cd /usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch #

Bill Paul wrote: > > Ok. I went out and bought a D-Link 530+ card with the same chip you > have and used the latest (.18) driver, and it works fine for me. > I am really not sure what's broken. There are only two small things > that _might_ have bearing on the problem. To test my theory, download > the driver from: > > http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/RealTek/4-stable

Hey guys, I am planning to buy some components for a Linux router that will handle the Internet access of 200 computers (includes tc shaping) and some inter sub-network routing (at least 100MBps per eth - and there are 3 eth cards). I was thinking of a: Pentium 4 - 3GHz 256 or 512MB RAM Network Cards. Now - I wonder what is more important: the processor speed or the amount of RAM. And can you

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> > To: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> > Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:12:03 AM > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >

Hi R list: How can I "repeat" a data frame n times (with n>1000), and obtain a new data frame where all the n data frames are binded by rows? Thank you for your help Kenneth -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone here had any experience with D-Link's quad-port ethernet NIC, model DFE-580TX ? The people from Mikrotik says it can cause systemwide lockup, but from what I have been reading around, this board seem to work ok. This is the only quad-port NIC I have found with a reasonable price, so I'm seriously considering using it. Comments ?

Folks, I am trying to get a loop to run which increments the object name as part of the loop. Here "fit1" "fit2" "fit3" and "fit4" are linear regression models that I have created. > for (ii in c(1:4)){ + SSE[ii]=rbind(anova(fit[ii])$"Sum Sq") + dfe[ii]=rbind(summary(fit[ii])$df) + } Error in anova(fit[ii]) : object 'fit' not found

Hi ! I'm using PXE to boot a Linux on a DLink DFE-530TX card. Everything worked well until I installed a Windows98 on it (please, foregive me...). Since the Windows drivers for that NIC were installed, I 'm unable to boot PXE, and I get the error: PXE-E61: Media test failure, check cable Any clue on how to make PXE work as before ? Cheers, -- Ludovic DROLEZ

Hi, I got problem while receiving multicast traffic on to my D-Link DFE-520TX PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter. Created bridge interface and attached the eth0 interface (D-link) to the bridge. H1------------------------eth0[LX-Bridge] Started Multicast traffic from H1 to Bridges eth0 port and the "tcpdump" doesn't who any packets If the eth0 interface is detached

Hi, Last week I discovered that my samba-server seems rather slow. When I searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope someone can suggest a solution. First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution). From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Jan Mostert.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 715 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20020306/e36726e6/JanMostert.vcf

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

Hi there, I'm having an odd problem where this NIC (cheap-o, yes I know) doesn't seem to work on FreeBSD correctly. I have the same cards (even revision models) in two win boxen and they work fine. 10baseT works but not 100baseT. With a normal NIC config, without explicitly setting the media to 10baseT, it will autosense as 100BaseT @ full-duplex, showing active. However I can't