similar to: union_lookup panic ...

grep union /var/log/messages Jul 2 12:53:01 jupiter savecore: reboot after panic: union_lookup returning . (0xc68e9e90) not same as startdir (0xc5e062c0) Jul 2 14:35:07 jupiter savecore: reboot after panic: union_lookup returning . (0xbf6fee90) not same as startdir (0xbb6d58c0) had two of them today, dumping nice cores ... I'm suspecting its someone trying to remove a file that is

G'day ... David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very heavily

As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?

Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems

Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same

Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous* connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same time? the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ... I konw with the 'idle'

Here's an odd question/request ... Right now, if you setup smb.conf with a [homes] section, anyone can connect and login to the server, as themselves, and mount their home directory. No probs there. Has anyone thought of, and possibly implemented, a means where that end user could change things for themselves to extend permissions on their directory? Basically, make a Win based utility

Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Marc G. Fournier

morning all ... I want to share a drive between two of my computers ... dont' want to deal with smbpasswd, so am just doing it as an open share with a host allow set to the computer that i want to share with ... smb.conf is setup nice and simple: [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.27.227.73 log file = /var/log/log.%m debug level = 3

Due to an issue I'm having with 7.x, and trying to track it down, I spent tonight getting my server setup to allow my to break into the debugger when it hangs, and hopefully dump core ... But, although I *think* I've got it all, I'm obviously missing something, as it isn't breaking ... First ... I'm running a proliant server, and when I connect via SSH to ILO on that

Morning... Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no* password... The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server, running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ... I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva

Just went to look at that page, and all the dates are pre-'98 as far as "last updates" are concerned... Does anyone have a URL or anything that has testimonials of some sort? Trying to provide my boss with ammunication against another 'manager' who just sent around comments from a Novell mailing list about Samba... I'm curious about stuff like server/platform being run

'K, not sure how/what to debug here ... doing a grep of svr1.postgresql.org in /proc/*/status shows all the processes 'stuck' in inode ... /proc/38750/status:inetd 38750 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120147,191009 0,0 0,592 inode 0 0 0,0,0,2,3,4,5,20,31 svr1.postgresql.org /proc/38752/status:inetd 38752 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120154,886433 0,0 0,637 inode 0 0

I can't answer any of this, but the following was taken from a thread on the "Novell Technology Transfer Partners List <NOVTTP@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" and passed over to me by my boss... Any comments/refutations/etc most definitely accepted... Please note that *I'm* the Senior Unix Systems Administrator at the University I work at, and have been moving us towards Samba since I

Okay guys, This is separate from my last few messages. Along with those attempts, I decided to migrate from pxelinux.0 to gpxelinux.0 in my existing setup. Admittedly I haven't tried previous gpxelinux.0's but I am willing to if someone thinks it would be useful. Everything works as expected with pxelinux.0 of the same version. With gpxelinux.0: TFTP Prefix: Trying to load:

Hi, I''m looking at a system hang on a large box: 160 cpus, 2TB. Dom0 is booted with 160 vcpus (don''t ask me why :)), and an HVM guest is started with over 1.5T RAM and 128 vcpus. The system hangs without much activity after couple hours. Xen 4.0.2 and 2.6.32 based 64bit dom0. During hang I discovered: Most of dom0 vcpus are in double_lock_balance spinning on one of the locks:

I have done a cvsup of the openssh port. It builds correctly, but refuses to install with the following: ===> Installing for openssh-3.6.1_5 ===> openssh-3.6.1_5 conflicts with installed package(s): ssh2-3.2.9.1_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh. I was unable to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

I just made one of my 4.x remote servers inaccessible and just tested it on my 5.x laptop, and it does the same thing ... not sure if this is considered a 'desirable' effect, or a but ... but ... 'ifconfig <device> -alias' will wipe out all IPs on the device: mobile# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask

But, following the instructions, I get: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> ./smbpasswd -j ACADIA -r pdc.acadiau.ca attempt_netbios_session_request: PDC.ACADIAU.CA rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER. Segmentation fault GDB shows: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> gdb !$ core gdb smbpasswd core GNU gdb 4.17 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU