similar to: 802.1x

Hello, I'm wondering about closing some information leaks in FreeBSD jails from the "outside world". Not that critical (depends on the application), but a simple user, with restricted devfs in the jail (devfsrules_jail for example from /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) can figure out the following: - network interfaces related data, via ifconfig, which contains everything, but the

Hi, IP traffic from one jail to another jail, arrives on destination jail on lo0 having the destination jails IP as source IP. Why not the source jail's IP address? How can I filter traffic from one jail to another, using ipfw of ipf? Cheers, -- Anders.

I have a problem with ZAP interface bridging in France (FXO interface): hangup is detected through a busy tone (no polarity inversion or whatever). When I dial out from a zap line when I receive an incoming call on another zap line (for example to redirect calls to my office when I'm not home), caller hangup is not detected because Asterisk seems to put itself out of the voice path because it

It looks like DTMF codes are not properly transmitted by bellster. For example, you can try the toll-free number 33800123456, which asks you to press *. When I tried that yesterday, the connection got dropped. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively

I am trying to register my Asterisk server to a SIP server which doesn't accept an Expires: field smaller than 1800 seconds and indicates it correctly with a Min-Expires: in an error response when Asterisk tries to use its default of 120 seconds. Is Asterisk supposed to honor this field and retry with the proposed minimum Expires: field? It looks like it doesn't, and I had to change the

Hi. I am looking for an IPv6 capable CVSUP mirror. I found a discussion from one year ago where it was stated that CVSUP was not IPv6-capable. Does anyone know if this has changed? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend. >> Dovecot issues the above command sequence (SELECT and UID FETCH pipelined), which doesn't work with this server. >>

On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate the requests. Maybe the answer is still jmap though? It would require jmap lib-storage backend similar to imapc, which

On 09/11/2017 09:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 15:29, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >>>> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is

Hi, This is a capture from an imapc client session (which is triggered by a message, received via LMTP): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE] Ready 2 LOGIN "uid" "pass" 2 OK LOGIN succeeded 1 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 1 OK LIST completed 3 APPEND "INBOX" {568} + Ready for 568 octets of data [...] 3 OK APPEND

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? This could be a

Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm,

> On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. >> I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established,

On 09/11/2017 11:14 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 11.09.2017 11:59, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly >>>> implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend.

Many friends of mine asked me to describe my home Asterisk setup. I've done that at: http://www.rfc1149.net/blog/index.php/mrhyde/2005/03/23/asterisk_build_your_own_pbx (or use the shorter http://tinyurl.com/5s79m URL) Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

Hi. I have just added two FXO cards in my PC: - Zap/1 is my France Telecom telephone line - Zap/2 is my Free telephone line (Free is an ADSL provider which provides an additional line using VOIP, but this line is only accessible as an FXS, no way to use it directly in H.323 or SIP) In incoming mode, those two lines ring different extensions in my phone installation. In outgoing mode,

This post is a FWDout specific one, but may be of interest for many Asterisk users and may even make more of them use FWDout for the good of everyone :) On the one hand, I have seen many reports of people using the FWDout (http://www.fwdout.net/) service who don't get credits because the prefix they provide calls for to is not popular. On the other hand, I get plenty of unused credits, much

Hi, Non-standard fields are mentioned here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir and they are stated as currently not used. Questions: - am I right that if they will be used, they will be key=value pairs, like fields in the base filename? Like: 1035478339.27041_118.foo.org,S=1000,W=1030:2,S,X=12,A=something - or are they supposed to be flags, like: