similar to: Reproducable panic with multicast on VLAN interface

Hi, all! Can I enable multicasting via shorewall? I have router with Gentoo Linux (one interface to ISP, one with alises - to local network). Shorewall work perfect! But now I need setup Quagga (zebra) for dynamic routing between one more router via another provider. All routers daemons (zebra, ripd, ospf) used multicasting. In my configuration already enabled allowBcast and etc.

I have a standard 3 interface shorewall setup and I want to receive multicast stuff from ''net'' -> ''loc''. This requires me, first, to do an IGMP join which involves 192.168.1.x -> 224.0.0.x being NATed out as the ''net'' interface''s IP address. Obviously replies have to be NATed back to ''loc'' addresses. Can

Hi all, We want linux (ubuntu) with 2.6 kernel to act as multicast router and to pass multicast packets between different subnets. And linux machine as router has two network cards having two different subnets assigned onto. We first worked "sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1" line on linux shell that made linux to work as unicast router. (like host, the multicast packets were discarded at

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100405/b0bb4b91/attachment-0003.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GilbertoNunesFerreira_html_185aa38c.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16538 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello All, Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just work" out of the box? (I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.) I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't be written... Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains

Hi @ all, I wamnt to combine two dataframes including a condition. I have two dataframes like the following: animal<-c("bear","bear","lion","monkey","fish","monkey","bear","zebra","zebra") val<-c(2,42,67,5,12,9,87,1,12)

I am trying to set up my Shorewall box to forward multicast packets to my local net. I do have some problems with mrouted (see below), but I can join and add routes using smcroute. Multicast works when shorewall is disabled. I got a lot of help from the following. http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016674.html I cannot get the multicast packets to pass the fw when

Hi folks, At work, we're considering the idea to replace the presente router with a stardard box with CentOS as a SO and GNU Zebra as a routing software. The line is a 4Mbps SDSL. ?What do you think about Zebra and what are your experiencies with it? Any feedback will be so appreciated. TIA.

I'm looking for an open source router solution, and someone from the list recently recommended zebra (www.zebra.org). I haven't yet identified all my needs, but I'm guessing that it will do all my routing needs for a, say, class C set of IP addresses, particularly if I ever have to do anything BGP-related. Anyone have any pointers before I delve in? Or possibly a recommendation for

On 07/02/2018 04:33 PM, Saito, Hideki wrote: > >   > > >It may not be a full solution for the problems you're trying to solve > >   > > If we are inventing a new solution, I’d like it also to solve OpenMP > declare simd legalization issue. If a small extension of existing scheme > > works for mathlib only, I’m happy to take that and discuss OpenMP >

It may not be a full solution for the problems you're trying to solve, but I don't know why adding to include/llvm/CodeGen/RuntimeLibcalls.def is a problem in itself. Certainly, it's a mess that could be organized, especially so we're not repeating everything for each data type as we do right now. So yes, I think that would allow us to remove the VecLib mappings because we are

To the best of my experience, handling case B (secondary induction) is must-have, and if I’m not mistaken, people aren’t opposed to that. For me, handling case A (primary induction) is “why not?”, but I certainly admit that that can be very naïve thinking coming from lack of good understanding on SCEV and their proper usages. Now, let’s assume we can postpone discussion about case A. What is the

Adding to Ashutosh's comments, We are also interested in making LLVM generate vector math library calls that are available with glibc (version > 2.22). reference: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/libmvec Using the example case given in the reference, we found there are 2 vector versions for "sin" (4 X double) with same VF namely _ZGVcN4v_sin (avx) version and _ZGVdN4v_sin

Hi Hideki, I like this summary overall, thanks. More below. > On May 20, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Saito, Hideki <hideki.saito at intel.com> wrote: > > > To the best of my experience, handling case B (secondary induction) is must-have, and if I’m not mistaken, > people aren’t opposed to that. > > For me, handling case A (primary induction) is “why not?”, but I certainly

Sorry for jumping from http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-September/125853.html but this is relevant. Sorry for not responding to that sooner. I was thinking about a longer reply, and time flied too quickly. >But, as I said back then, before we do so, we need to understand >exactly where to put it. That will depend on what other passes will >actually use it and if we want it

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

For example, Type 2 case, scalar-foo used call by value while vector-foo used call by ref. The question Johannes is asking is whether we can decipher that after the fact, only by looking at the two function signatures, or need some more info (what kind, what's minimal)? I think we need to list up cases of interest, and for each vector ABI of interest, we need to work on the requirements and

Hello Anyone used Zebra routing daemon and created virtual routers before? Is it possible to run OSPF/BGP on each virtual server and get them to talk to each other? I''m new to Xen and I need to know... I will be trying this out in the coming days and I want to know about any pitfalls to avoid. -- Nonchalantly yours GobbledeGeek [Every thing but Gobbledegook.. !!]

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

>it cannot afford large size masks for large vectors So, even a standard way of vectorizing remainder in masked or unmasked fashion wouldn’t work, I suppose. Ouch. I suppose VPlan should be able to model this kind of gigantic remainder vector code (when the time comes). Not pretty at all, though. Now, be fully aware that Direction #2 is really a poor (or rather extremely poor) person’s