similar to: make stops in bind's compilation

I wonder how to process the statistics logged by nsd. We compile with --enable-bind8-stats and I thought we would be able to reuse the Perl script that translated our BIND8 statistics to MRTG. But the script has problems, probably because nsd has several daemons, not just one, and each one is logging statistics. Aug 4 10:34:01 ns2 nsd[24573]: NSTATS 1059986041 1059979224 A=292259 NS=4886

Hi When I install bind8 through ports it doesn't create the dir named 'namedb' and the needed files that it's supposed to do according to the handbook. Has anyother experienced this?

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: libnftnl 1.0.6 libnftnl is a userspace library providing a low-level netlink programming interface (API) to the in-kernel nf_tables subsystem. The library libnftnl has been previously known as libnftables. This library is currently used by the nft command line tool. This release includes the following list of updates: * New TLV

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146 ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-03-08 07:38 ------- I just went through someone with this problem. And HAVE_BOGUS_SYS_QUEUE_H worked for them. However you must have BOTH HAVE_SYS_QUEUE_H and HAVE_BOGUS_SYS_QUEUE_H set. As for INADDR_LOOPBACK. I'd like to know where on BSD/OS that is defined so we can

Hi, NSD 4.8.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 64f1da8f8163340f9d3b352ef8819e3c72c951fdd87cff55dc3b6a6b1ea27942 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz.asc This release introduces PROXYv2 support and faster statistics gathering, removes the database option and fixes bugs. The proxy protocol support is an implementation

I have been asked to update OpenLDAP to the latest stable version. I am using CentOS 4.2 and have OpenLDAP 2.2.13 installed. I can install from source if I have to, but I would rather stay with rpm packages if possible. I found an rpm from Fedora Core Development on RPMFIND. Will this one work with Centos, or should I grab the source rpm and rebuild it? Bowie

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c2c6d8ced889948d7a52fbbb577ec2ff bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm 0c66970cb9b1b46e7f8210c638134ba7 bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1179 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1179.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0f252bb2790ca6c3409c6d1077dbde2a bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.2.x86_64.rpm 9c2df4609ef325b9fe235c7cb2646657 bind-chroot-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.2.x86_64.rpm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 For all those currently using BIND 8, please be aware of the notice below from ISC. Given that we have moved to BIND 9 for all of our releases from 5.x on (and BIND 9.4.x in 7-soon-to-be-release), and given that FreeBSD 4 was the last branch to have BIND 8, and itself is now EOL, the time has come to say good-bye to BIND 8. I will be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:19.bind Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: bind8 negative cache poison attack Category: contrib Module: contrib_bind Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:19.bind Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: bind8 negative cache poison attack Category: contrib Module: contrib_bind Announced:

Someone I was speaking with this evening claimed they have installed the latest named rpms yet they are still getting exploited daily and being hacked. Do the latest rpm''s for the named 4.9.x stuff fix all the root exploits or is this person just an idiot who probably has holes elsewhere in the system?

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c56c92553eb90170033acee5bb59452b bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm b29a740114dad7c05298c3d918d58d9f bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1179 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1179.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 544a05af9819f3ea8d1c6a490cfaddda bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.2.i386.rpm 1886d7d9563bb845ba7bab4149aeba06 bind-chroot-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.2.i386.rpm

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2019 14:12 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba_dns_question > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:54:00 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

Hello, ? This is a quick and dirty setup, it can be used as guideline for an "debian/ubuntu" based install with use of the sernet samba packages. Since this was a bit hard to figure out, i'm sharing this. ? Please correct the wrongs in this setup if you found some to make it a better and easy to read?setup. ( and please correct my typos ;-) ) ? This server wil join a windows 2008

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:27:12 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > > Rowland Penny via samba > > Verzonden: dinsdag 22 januari 2019 14:12 > > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Re:

Hi, I've been working on a replacement for nsd-xfer/bind-xfer for the use with NSD for some evenings now, and since I believe that at least some of you do have the same problem I experienced during my transition to NSD (that is, bind-xfer is only available in BIND8, which is sometimes a little bit peeky in being compiled, plus the many invokations of that program during the regular

Hi guys, I know this sounds vague and I'll try to explain in more depth now, but firstly, does Samba4 internal DNS, cache any records that were looked up from a forwarder, and then secondly what is the default timeout for waiting for a DNS lookup off of a DNS forwarder? I've installed two new Samba4 PDC's(using the built in DNS server and not named) for two separate sites, and both

Andrew, Jerry and the rest of the team: Hello again! It has been quite some time since I was here and waded the waters to set up bind8 and samba 2.07 on my trust mdk 7.2 box. (by the way, it is still working like a champ) over 400 days uptime before the last extended power outage. Well, obviously a lot has changed since the 2.07 days and I am now working on a SuSE 8.2 box with samba 2.2.7a