similar to: in a replicated setup, how safe is it to take a brick down

On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster > volume status and gluster peer status. > > Apart? from above info, please provide glusterd logs, > cmd_history.log. > > Thanks > Gaurav > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:22 PM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:

Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > >> Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster volume status >> and gluster peer status. >> >> Apart from above info, please provide glusterd logs,

Additionally the brick log file of the same brick would be required. Please look for if brick process went down or crashed. Doing a volume start force should resolve the issue. On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 16:28, Gaurav Yadav <gyadav at redhat.com> wrote: > Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log. > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek

On 13/09/17 20:47, Ben Werthmann wrote: > These symptoms appear to be the same as I've recorded in > this post: > > http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-September/032435.html > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Atin Mukherjee > <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com > <mailto:atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Additionally the

hi everyone I have 3-peer cluster with all vols in replica mode, 9 vols. What I see, unfortunately, is one brick fails in one vol, when it happens it's always the same vol on the same brick. Command: gluster vol status $vol - would show brick not online. Restarting glusterd with systemclt does not help, only system reboot seem to help, until it happens, next time. How to troubleshoot this

These symptoms appear to be the same as I've recorded in this post: http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-September/032435.html On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally the brick log file of the same brick would be required. > Please look for if brick process went down or crashed. Doing a volume start

Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster volume status and gluster peer status. Apart from above info, please provide glusterd logs, cmd_history.log. Thanks Gaurav On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:22 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi everyone > > I have 3-peer cluster with all vols in replica mode, 9 vols. > What I see, unfortunately, is one brick

sorry guys to spam a bit - I hope someone from redhat could check whether - freeipa-users at redhat.com - is up & ok? I've been a subscriber for a couple of years but now, suddenly(?) I cannot mail there, I get: " Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: 554: 5.7.1 <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: Recipient

Logs from newly added node helped me in RCA of the issue. Info file on node 10.5.6.17 consist of an additional property "tier-enabled" which is not present in info file from other 3 nodes, hence when gluster peer probe call is made, in order to maintain consistency across the cluster cksum is compared. In this case as both files are different leading to different cksum, causing state in

On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote: > Hello lejeczek, > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> Hi guys. >> >> I cannot wrap my hear around this: >> >> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $

On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: > > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, > to a regular fs and removing acl works as

hi everybody I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user databases for the same one user. I'm thinking, mail to me via pam mail to me at this.domain via ldap whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage target, I see permissions have to be mangled, available to write for both vmail and actual uid. what do you think? Is it how it's done? regards

I think I'm near getting a simple replication, but on server which is still "empty" I get: Initialization failed: Namespace '': mkdir(/var/spool/mail/ccnr.biotechnology/nr412/Maildir) failed: Permission denied (euid=1187(nr412) egid=513(Domain Users) missing +w perm: /var/spool/mail, we're not in group 12(mail), dir owned by 0:12 mode=0775 but repl from server runs

hi everyone, is there a way to add custom mount points at installation point? And if there is would you say /usr should/could go onto a separate partition? many thanks, L.

1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network, from the rest of the cluster. 2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got detached with "gluster peer detach" command which succeeded, so now cluster comprise of three peers 3) Self-heal daemon (for some reason) does not start(with an attempt to restart glusted) on the peer which probed that fourth peer. 4) fourth

I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some final clarification. a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that PAM/SSSD uses to authenticated users, and these LDAPs are also is used by Samba, users start @ uid 1000. Boxes are in the same both DNS and Samba domains. Do I treat these users as system or virtual users from postfix/dovecot perspective? If it can be a

hi fellas, same old same in log of the probing peer I see: ... 2017-08-29 13:36:16.882196] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3020:__glusterd_handle_probe_query] 0-glusterd: Responded to priv.xx.xx.priv.xx.xx.x, op_ret: 0, op_errno: 0, ret: 0 [2017-08-29 13:36:16.904961] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2606:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid:

On 19/06/15 15:13, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Jun 19, 2015 9:08 AM, "lejeczek" <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some final > clarification. >> a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that PAM/SSSD uses to > authenticated users, and these LDAPs are also is used by Samba, users start > @ uid

hi guys I have a simple case of: $ setfacl -b not working! I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a regular fs and removing acl works as expected. Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to modify/remove ACLs for users, groups and masks but that one simple, important thing does not work. It is also not the case of default ACLs being enforced from the parent, for I

Could you please send me "info" file which is placed in "/var/lib/glusterd/vols/<vol-name>" directory from all the nodes along with glusterd.logs and command-history. Thanks Gaurav On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:13 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi fellas, > same old same > in log of the probing peer I see: > ... > 2017-08-29