similar to: [Bug 1999] New: When speaking v2, send client version first to avoid long delay with some proxies

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org |djm at mindrot.org Attachment #2145|0

Hi, The problem started when i installed a kodicom 4400 card and started to run zoneminder. Prior to that no problems with my machine, which now runs FreeBSD panix.internal.net 7.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p3 #3: Mon Jul 14 16:35:37 EEST 2008 doroot@panix.internal.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 This hardware change happened in Sunday Jul 13. The next day (Jul 14) morning

On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:32, Ken Bass <daytooner at gmail.com> wrote: > > The problem/issue: there is a very long delay when my system does a write to the filesystem. The delay now is over 5 minutes (yes: minutes). This only happens on the first write after booting up the system, and only for large files - 1GB or more. This can be a serious problem since all access to any hard disk is

I asked about this a while back. It seems that this problem is getting much worse. The problem/issue: there is a very long delay when my system does a write to the filesystem. The delay now is over 5 minutes (yes: minutes). This only happens on the first write after booting up the system, and only for large files - 1GB or more. This can be a serious problem since all access to any hard disk is

Thx Andreas. re: block bitmaps - yes that is what I really meant. My experience with filesystems is mainly from CPM/BDOS, where "directory" and block mapping are essentially synonymous. And now I understand about the timing. Makes sense when you describe it that way. My system is ext4, although I doubt that I used "flex_bg" option, since this was first created awhile back. I

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Summary: high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

I am using speex in a voip project.I use an ARM 9 based cpu. all is ok but on problem exists. after I pause my speaking a while, for example, 2 minutes, the other peer hearsthe voice delay. I have made many test to lookup its reason, it\'s seems that decode process needs more CPU power in this case. I use mono 8KHz , encoding without VAD and preprocessor. who can tell me how to adjust some

On 4/4/2015 10:02 AM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: > Don't need to block anyone like in the "Re: Dovecot Oy merger with > Open-Xchange AG" thread, but when I have my vacation recipie active, I'd like > it to NOT reply to certain addresses. > > I tried the following, you can see the section with > > if header :contains "addressIdontwant at

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com

I'm using asterisk 1.4.11 and Zaptel version 1.4.5.1 with kernel 2.6.22. I have the ztdummy module loaded, which is using zaptel and rtc. When the ztdummy module is loaded, sounds are not heard when using the asterisk "background" command. When the ztdummy module is unloaded, which also removes zaptel and rtc, sounds are heard. I've also tested this under kernel 2.6.21 with the

I am using asterisk Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-1 as found in Debian. I'm using a call file to connect a meetme conference to an AGI script which plays files using the stream_file method. I have four files which should play in sequence, though only the first two files actually play. I get these errors in the CLI: [Sep 16 06:20:43] NOTICE[18424]: app_meetme.c:1911 conf_run: Audio bytes: 276 Buffer

I don't know if this is RedHat 5.1 specific, but be aware that the version of portmap distributed is the enhanced (Wietse Venema) version. That's great, except for two things. The first is documented, but easy to overlook: "In order to avoid deadlocks, the portmap program does not attempt to look up the remote host name or user name...The upshot of all this is that only network

Don't need to block anyone like in the "Re: Dovecot Oy merger with Open-Xchange AG" thread, but when I have my vacation recipie active, I'd like it to NOT reply to certain addresses. I tried the following, you can see the section with if header :contains "addressIdontwant at repliedtoo.tld" is commented out, once I'd added that section, no Vacation messages

I submitted a patch to fix a problem I have experienced when multiple proxies are in between the rails process and the browser. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3397 This problem has come up because I have a few rails application on an intranet where I have to use proxies to provide access to some clients. I have done little work with this sort of thing before so I was hoping to get more input

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6694 Summary: rsync -A drops mask from ACL Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla at baldwin.users.panix.com

Hello all. I have load balancing (DSL + Cable) ala nano HOWTO + some modifications. Works great. LAN | ----------- | LOAD | |BALANCER | ----------- | | Firewall Firewall | | Cable DSL Modem Modem | | Internet Internet I would like to be able to define proxies for certain applications so that I can force them to use a particular

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > CentOS is unquestionably one of the most used Linux distros > in the world, and yet the mailing list is relatively quiet. To me this is > a symptom of a problem, and I feel that it's partially a result of the same > regular people, I think it is generally a good thing when the

There have been quite a few questions recently about this, so I have tried to gather experience. I set up a proxy using Apache2 (a very common server) behind our firewall and tried various authentication approaches. One comment: all the methods return error messages when they fail. Please don't report `it doesn't work' without the full details. 1) For a proxy that authenticates

Hi All, I have no experience with VOIP or SIP, but I am a *nix networking admin for some years now and I would like to get into working with SIP etc... I have installed asterisk and configured it to run with 2 software phones. This works fine, and I can chat between 2 client machines in our office. Please can anyone point me to any documentation about how to use authentication to stop

>From various place I can't resolve the name; from others it works fine eg on my FIOS line (96.234.66.*): fail from Panix internet (166.84.67.*): success (166.84.5.*): success from bt.net (194.72.6.*): fail from he.net (65.19.175.*): fail from AShosting.nl (81.171.86.*): success -- rgds Stephen