similar to: Kaplan Meier analysis: 95% CI wider in R than in SAS

Dear All, a Surv object I put in a data frame behaves somehow unexpected (see example). If I do a Cox regression on the original Surv object it works. If I put it in a data.frame and do the regression on the data frame it does not work. Seemingly it has to do with the class attribute, because if I change the class attribute to let "Surv" appeare first, again it works. Is this known?

Dear All, Trying to combine two data frames with identical structure by rbind() or merge() I cannot find a way to preserve the class of a Surv object (see example). Reading the help page for rbind, I an uncertain if I could expect that a Surf oject retains it's class, but I would wish it did. Thanks Heinz T?chler R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-03 r39792) Windows XP library(survival) ##

Dear All, there seems to be some strange influence of the Design package on data.frame. If I build a data.frame containing a Surv object without loading the package Design, the data frame is usable to coxph. If instead I just load Design and build a data.frame afterwards, the naming of the Surv object is different and it does not work with coxph. (In my real application I loaded Design to use the

We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to set out the expected upgrade strategy and try to polish it to be as user friendly as possible. We're getting this out here now, because there was quite a bit of concern and confusion regarding the upgrades between 3.x and 4.0+. --- ## Background Gluster-4.0 will bring a newer management daemon, GlusterD-2.0 (GD2),

if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access volume without any challenge? I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote: > We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to > set out the expected upgrade strategy and try to polish it to be as > user

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > volume without any challenge? > > I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? Very short answer, yes. Your volumes will remain the same. And you will continue to access them the same way. RIO (as DHT2 is now known as) developers

Just so I am clear the upgrade process will be as follows: upgrade all clients to 4.0 rolling upgrade all servers to 4.0 (with GD1) kill all GD1 daemons on all servers and run upgrade script (new clients unable to connect at this point) start GD2 ( necessary or does the upgrade script do this?) I assume that once the cluster had been migrated to GD2 the glusterd startup script will be smart

Will the various client packages (centos in my case) be able to automatically handle the upgrade vs new install decision, or will we be required to do something manually to determine that? It?s a little unclear that things will continue without interruption because of the way you describe the change from GD1 to GD2, since it sounds like it stops GD1. Early days, obviously, but if you could

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Darrell Budic <budic at onholyground.com> wrote: > Will the various client packages (centos in my case) be able to > automatically handle the upgrade vs new install decision, or will we be > required to do something manually to determine that? We should be able to do this with CentOS (and other RPM based distros) which have well split glusterfs

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Alastair Neil <ajneil.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > Just so I am clear the upgrade process will be as follows: > > upgrade all clients to 4.0 > > rolling upgrade all servers to 4.0 (with GD1) > > kill all GD1 daemons on all servers and run upgrade script (new clients > unable to connect at this point) > > start GD2 ( necessary or

does RIO improves folder listing and rebalance, when compared to 3.x? if yes, do you have any performance data comparing RIO and DHT? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > > if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access > > volume

I installed GD2 1.0/1.1, but they are both not working, does anyone knows why? Great Thanks! With GD 1.0 I got: ======================================================== RuntimeError unknown symbol "gdImageSquareToCircle" RAILS_ROOT: /home/virtual/site1/fst/var/www/html/imodesite/public/../config/.. Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace

Meeting date: 05/02/2018 (May 02nd, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 * Download: <TBD> Attendance * Raghavendra M (Raghavendra Bhat), Kaleb, Atin, Amar, Nithya, Rafi, Shyam Agenda * Commitment (GPLv2 Cure) * Email and Patch * [amarts] 20+ people already have done +1. Will wait another

Wrong list. Post on r-sig-finance instead. Cheers, Bert On Nov 20, 2017 11:25 PM, "Joe O" <joerodonnell at gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I'm trying to understand how to use the pbo package by looking at a vignette. I'm curious about a part of the vignette that creates simulated returns data. The package author transforms his simulated returns in a way that I'm

I''m just getting started with GD2 and have successfully made a few dynamic PNGs. I need to make some fairly detailed line graphs on the fly and I know that GD2 is capable of what I want but I strongly suspect I''m reinventing the wheel badly. Are there gems or other projects that help creating complex charts? I''ve used GDChart in the distant past but I

While I've closed off most races in a previous patch, a small race still existed where importing then unreffing cound cause an invalid bo. Add a test for this case. Racing sequence fixed: - thread 1 releases bo, refcount drops to zero, blocks on acquiring nvdev->lock. - thread 2 increases refcount to 1. - thread 2 decreases refcount to zero, blocks on acquiring nvdev->lock. At this

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com> --- xf86atomic.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/xf86atomic.h b/xf86atomic.h index 8c4b696..17fb088 100644 --- a/xf86atomic.h +++ b/xf86atomic.h @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef struct { # define atomic_read(x) ((x)->atomic) # define atomic_set(x, val) ((x)->atomic = (val)) # define atomic_inc(x)

Dear R-helpers: I am trying to fit a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, modelling survival outcome as a function of treatment and receptor status. The data look like below: # structure of the data str(sample.data) List of 4 $ survobj : Surv [1:129, 1:2] 0.8925+ 1.8836+ 2.1191+ 5.3744+ 1.6099+ 5.2567 0.2081+ 0.2108+ 0.2683+ 0.4873+ ... ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2

[re-sending - previous email went out by accident before complete] Hi Joe, The centering and re-scaling is done for the purposes of his example, and also to be consistent with his definition of the sharpe function. In particular, note that the sharpe function has the rf (riskfree) parameter with a default value of .03/252 i.e. an ANNUAL 3% rate converted to a DAILY rate, expressed in decimal. That

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- nouveau/nouveau.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- nouveau/private.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/nouveau/nouveau.c b/nouveau/nouveau.c index ee7893b..72c31cf 100644 --- a/nouveau/nouveau.c +++ b/nouveau/nouveau.c @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ nouveau_device_wrap(int fd, int close, struct