similar to: Help with vectorization

Dear all, I'd like tweaking the ... arguments that one user can pass in my function for fitting a model. More precisely, my objective function is (really) problematic to optimize using the "optim" function. Consequently, I'd like to add in the "control" argument of the latter function a "ndeps = rep(something, #par)" and/or "parscale =

Dear r-list folks, I have a problem which has been bugging me for a while now and I was hoping someone out there might be able to help. If I have a user-defined function with an indeterminate number of arguments, using the well-known "..." construct, how can I get the function to return the names of the items which were the arguments of the function as part of the function's

Hi to all I did not found the right hints for functions with the dot-dot-dot argument. Is it possible to write own functions with the tree dots and if yes what's wrong with the following example? test <- function(x, ...) { print (x) if (exists("y"))print(y) if (exists("z"))print(z) } test(4,y=2) With regards Carmen

This is was something like a request for your comments, thoughts on the topic... Many of you will know that the "..." (aka \dots) argument is very useful for passing ``further graphical parameters'', but can be a pain when itself is passed to too many plotting functions inside your own function. An artificial example being myplot <- function(x,y, ...) { plot(0:1, 0:1,

Dear list, I have a function whose first argument is '...'. Each element of '...' is a data frame, and there will be at least 2 data frames in '...'. The function processes each of the data frames in '...' and returns a list, whose components are the processed data frames. I would like to name the components of this returned list with the names of the original data

$B!zCK@-$O40A4L5NAEPO?$r$7$FBT$D$@$1$G$9!#(B $B>/$74i$bA*$s$@J}$,$$$$$+$b!)!)$=$l$O$*G$$;$7$^$9!#(B http://www.00-love5.com/serebu/s.html $B!V(BYAHOO!$B!W!V(BGoogle$B!W$N8!:w7k2L$O$=$N%5%$%H$N?M5$!"(B $B?.MjEY!J%f!<%6!<$K$h$kEjI<!K$G=g0L$,7hDj$7$^$9!#(B $BEv%5%$%H$O8!:w%+%F%4%j(B $B!TAG?M%[%9%H!U$K$F%H%C%W%Z!<%8$G>R2p$5$l$F$$$^$9!#(B

Dear list members, I am trying to estimate parameters of the AR(1)-GARCH(1,1) model. I have one additional dummy variable for the AR(1) part. First I wanted to do it using garchFit function (everything would be then estimated in one step) however in the fGarch library I didn't find a way to include an additional variable. That would be the formula but, as said, I think it is impossible to add

I'm trying to write some functions to deal with empty actual arguments that are picked up by '...' formals. Such actual arguments are common (and very useful) in calls to subsetting functions, e.g., x[1:2,]. It seems that R and S-PLUS treat these arguments differently: in S-PLUS list(...) will return a list containing just the non-empty arguments, whereas in R list(...) stops

Hi.. i have an expression of the form: model1<-nls(y~beta1*(x1+(k1*x2)+(k1*k1*x3)+(k2*x4)+(k2*k1*x5)+(k2*k2*x6)+(k3*x7)+(k3*k4*x8)+(k3*k2*x9)+(k3*k3*x10)+ (k4*x11)+(k4*k1*x12)+(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+

In this real example (below), all four of the replicates in one treatment combination had zero failures, and this produced a very high standard error in the summary.lm. =20 Just adding one failure to one of the replicates produced a well-behaved standard error. =20 I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly hard for users to understand. =20 I would value your comments=20 =20 Thanks =20

Hey all, I am trying to work under a State Space form, but I didn't get the help exactly. Have anyone eles used this functions? I was used to work with S-PLUS, but I have some codes I need to adpt. Thanks alot, Bernardo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, i'm very new to R, so sorry for what i'm sure is a very basic question. I'm producing a boxplot with the data below: df3<-data.frame( x=c(10,11,115,12,13,14,16,17,18,21,22,23,24,26,27,28,29,3,30,32,33,34,35,4,4 1,45,5,50,52,56,58,6,67,6738,68,7,8,9), fq=c(8,11,1,2,4,4,2,2,6,3,4,2,2,1,1,1,4,51,3,1,1,1,1,35,1,1,19,2,1,1,1,14,1, 1,1,10,13,5),

Hello, I think I really need some help on this. Since Samba 4.2.11 upgrade my Windows 10 clients are unable to synchronize group policies. I have asked about this already here <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199226.html>. Now I re-investigate the issue with Windows 10 1607 update and still face the same issue which prevents me from rolling out this configuration in

Hi, I'm new to R and have a problem with a little test program (see below). Why doesn't <<- in function rk4 assign the new value to y so that it is seen in rktest. I thought that <<- does exactly this. But it seems that I didn't get it right. I would be very appreciative for an explanation of that behaviour of <<-. I know how to write the whole thing so that it

I'm having trouble reshaping a data.frame from long to wide. (I think that's the right terminology; feel free to educate me.) I've looked at the reshape function and package and plyr package, but I can't quite figure out how to do this after a dozen variations. I have a data.frame with more levels than this, but similar to: > tst K1 K2 K3 V1 V2 V3 1 10 D a 0.08 99

Hi, I have a question about how to obtain the union of several data frame rows. I'm trying to create a common key for several tests composed of different items. Here is a small scale version of the problem. These are keys for 4 different tests, not all mutually exclusive: id q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 1 A C 2 B D 3 A D B 4 C D B D I would like

Hi, I am generating large Kac matrices (also known as Clement matrix). This a tridiagonal matrix. I was wondering whether there is a vectorized solution that avoids the `for' loops to the following code: n <- 1000 Kacmat <- matrix(0, n+1, n+1) for (i in 1:n) Kacmat[i, i+1] <- n - i + 1 for (i in 2:(n+1)) Kacmat[i, i-1] <- i-1 The above code is fast, but I am curious about

When compiling the software it breaks with an error on the cipher.c file. Lot's of warnings and error of undeclared stuff. Snippet follows: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I. -I/usr/local/ssl/include -Iyes -I/usr/local/include -DSSHDIR=\"/etc\" -D_PATH_SSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/bin/ssh\"

Hi all, I'm not familiar with R programming and I'm trying to reproduce a result from a paper. Basically, I have a dataset which I would like to model in terms of successive increments, i.e. (y denote empirical values of y) y_1 = y1, y_2 = y1 + delta1, y_3 = y1 + delta1 + delta2. ... y_m = y1 + sum_2^m delta j where delta_j donote successive increments in the y-values, i.e. delta

Hola Comunidad, Tengo una duda, Queria que en un For si fuese ejecutando un proceso desde 1 hasta 5 por poner un ejemplo , y que el resultado se fuese guardando en variables que se llamar Ki, es decir k1, k2, k3... Un ejemplo de como crei que funcionaria y no lo hizo xD for (i in 1:3) { paste("k", i, sep = "") <- sum(1:i) } Esperaba se crearan las variables k1 =