similar to: normalization of multi-value string variable

Dear All, I need to estimate the level of similarity of two strings. For example: string1 <- c("depending","audience","research", "school"); string2 <- c("audience","push","drama","button","depending"); The words in string may occur in different order though. What function would you recommend to use

Hi All, Here is the case. I want to build classification model (SVM). Some of variables for this model are categorical attributes which represent words (usually 3-10 words - query for search in google). For example: search_id | query_words |..| result -----------+----------------------------------+--+-------- 1 | how,to,grow,tree |..| 4 2

When you first visit my site, you see a snippet (the first 75 words) of the most recent post. If it exceeds 75 words, a link will be appended to extend the post and read it in full. Now, my problem is when I post a code snippet, and I use "pre" tags to preserve its formatting, I don''t want that to show up on the snippet... only on the full version of the post. The reason is

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:28:13PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > > It doesn't work for me at first since in my llvm there's only > llvm.bpf.load.*. > > I think llvm.bpf.store.* belone to some patches you haven't posted yet? nope. only loads have special instructions ld_abs/ld_ind which are represented by these intrinsics. stores, so far, are done via single

Hello, What is the best method to replace a substring within a string? I''m trying this: url.gsub(string_to_replace,replacement) but i get the following error: undefined method `rewrite'' for #<String:0x3711a58> -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Interesting, so I guess we can check for whether it's an array type and adjust accordingly instead? Blocking *all* global variables without definitive initializers feels a bit much to me, especially if they have primitive types (i.e. integers) that don't have the potential to be screwed around with like this. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:14 PM George Burgess IV < george.burgess.iv at

In this function (used to check the size of a global) there is an initial check for whether the initializer to this function is "definitive." My question is: why do we need this? How does the object's size change if a global's initializer is defined at link time? Thanks, Karl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear RHelp-list, ?I want to write at a specific position in a file without reading all the file because it is very large and I cannot read it in my RAM. But I miss something about the use of the command writeBin in conjunction with seek. In the example bellow the seek commands works well with the readBin command but not with writeBin, the writeBin command write from the beginning of the file

Hello folks, when using Darkice to send a stream to an Icecast 1 server, the icecast administration page is not updated correctly.The mountpoint etc.. is all there, but the name of the darkice stream is not there. It has been replaced with the name of the default stream for the server. To ensure I had not overlooked anything, I had also tried the same thing with MuSE, and the same behaviour was

? Tue, 21 May 2024 11:29:33 +0200 Laurent Rhelp <laurentRHelp at free.fr> ?????: > pos <- seek(con_in,2,origin="start") > # We have to repeat the command to return the good amount of read > # bytes > print(paste0("pos is not equal to 2, pos = ",pos)) That's because seek() returns the previous position ("before any move", the one that the

Dear all, I am trying to conduct an enhanced version of factor analysis with a SPSS interface that allows to use R. This approach has been suggested in the recent article: Basto, M. and J.M. Pereira An SPSS R-Menu for Ordinal Factor Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 46, pp. 1-29. My variables are ordinal-type and the tool of Basto allows to run polychoric correlations in the SPSS

One could also argue that paste0("a", "b", "c") is a function call that needs to be evaluated at runtime, whereas "abc" is a string constant understood by the parser, and often also language agnostic. I'd assume compilers and code- and text-search tools do a better job with the latter. /Henrik On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 2:18?PM Josiah Parry

I was thinking today, it would be nice if a view could tell a model how to format it''s data for that particular view. Kind of like, the view is bestowing instant, and temporary knowledge on the model for the duration of the views run. It seemed to me that this would be more objecty than say a helper that formats a string format_my_string( my_string ) Instead, in my view. Lets assume I

I suppose taste is learned as well. It does feel quite odd that the best way to define a long string without a note or text wrapping is by being creative with functions. This is valid in Python, Julia, and Rust (if you add `let` and a terminating semi-colon): my_str = "part1\ part2\ part2" I don't think it is abnormal to expect or desire this type of functionality in our favorite

Hi, I want to automate somewhat the addition of created_by/updated_by fields on my models (i.e. to include username). What''s the best/recommended way to do this? Would it be to: a) Find out how to extend the ActiveRecord::Base itself (I haven''t extended a class before yet) b) Use a plugin type approach where you have to add a tag manually to each model file which then

> On 3 Jun 2025, at 09:34, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > > One could also argue that paste0("a", "b", "c") is a function call that needs to be evaluated at runtime, whereas "abc" is a string constant understood by the parser, and often also language agnostic. I'd assume compilers and code- and text-search tools

Hi all, This is my first post to the list, so I hope it gets through and I don''t do anything wrong :) Here''s the issue I''m having... I have an rjs that''s doing: page.replace_html ''myid'', :partial => ''my_partial'' And in my my_partial I have: <script type="text/javascript">

Like Tomas, I find the paste0 readability to be **much** better, partly because it allows for better indentation (as Tomas pointed out). Perhaps a pointless email, but sometimes - for these subjective issues - it is worthwhile to point out a difference in opinion. Best, Kasper On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 12:27?PM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/2/25 17:37,

Send again since llvmdev is moved to llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org On 2015/8/5 9:58, Wangnan (F) wrote: > > > On 2015/8/4 17:01, Wangnan (F) wrote: >> For people who in llvmdev: >> >> This mail is belong to a thread in linux kernel mailing list, the >> first message >> can be retrived from: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55B1535E.8090406 at

Hi all, I need to normalized iTRAQ data. I have a table like this: C8/C2 A2/C2 A8/C2 1 1.2 1.1 1.5 2 0.2 0.9 0.2 3 1 0.1 0.1 4 1.1 1.1 0.9 ... ... ... ... But I know that ratio at row 1 and at row 4 should be 1! How can I do to normalized my data?! thaks in advance marco