similar to: Building Wine with multiple jobs

Hi, I installed Asterisk with CAPI support. Everything works fine while starting Asterisk, but when a call comes in Asterisk hangsup the call after two times of ringing. The output is like: Jun 24 22:19:49 NOTICE[1082178480]: chan_capi.c:1931 capi_handle_msg: CONNECT_IND ID=002 #0x011d LEN=0048 Controller/PLCI/NCCI = 0x101 CIPValue = 0x10

First of all, thanks for you time. I have kind of a tricky question and wanted to see what you guys thought. ------------------------------------------- Lets say I have this: ------------------------------------------- class Purchase < ActiveRecord::Base validates_numericality_of :some_number, :only_integer => true end ------------------------------------------- Then I do this:

Hi all, I need a little help with flow control in R. What I'd like to do is to advance a for loop by changing its counter. However, what seems obvious to me does not yield the proper results. An example of my problem is for (i in seq(1, some_number, some_increment)){ <some stuff> if (some_condition == T) i <- i + 2; #want to advance the loop by 2 } Whenever the counter goes

* Richard W.M. Jones: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: >> diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am >> index 5dd2c9b..708b2e7 100644 >> --- a/ocaml/Makefile.am >> +++ b/ocaml/Makefile.am > [...] >> +# Tell version 3.79 and up of GNU make to not build goals in this >> +# directory in parallel. >> +.NOTPARALLEL:

SENIOR COMPILER ENGINEER and COMPILER DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Job type: Full time employee Location: Princeton, NJ Description: Parakinetics Inc., a vibrant stealth mode startup, is seeking experienced and talented engineers to join a team developing unique compilation tools for multicore processors. Successful candidates will have the opportunity to work with a team converting breakthrough

Recently, I brought up a topic about white boarders being drawn instead of shadows in Gnome-Window-Decorator. A patch was made up by gandalfn to correct this by making 32 pixel shadows 33 pixels, however the patch was not committed because it was a workaround. This is a huge functional annoyance to us intel users and needs to be cured. There are two soultions I can think of: 1 Get in contact

dear R readers---I thought I would post the following snippet of R code that makes by() like operations easier and faster on multicore machines for R novices and amateurs. I hope it helps some. YMMV. feel free to ignore. PS: I wish R had a POD-like documentation system for end users that are not writing full libraries. because it does not, I did not provide documentation ala '?mc.by'.

Hi Eric, I'm using gcc. My make command is make -j9 as mentioned earlier, the -cc1 switch did the trick for me. Thanks for helping out. -- Roland ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at apple.com> > To: "Roland Leißa" <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> > Cc: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Freitag, 13. April 2012 14:39:53

Hi, I want to parallelize some computations when it's possible on multicore machines. Each computation produces a big objects that I don't want to store if not necessary: in the end only the object that best fits my data have to be returned. In non-parallel mode, a single gloabl object is updated if the current computation gets a better result than the best previously found. My plan

i put following line in CMakeLists.txt; add_subdirectory(mypass) then used make -j9 then i used following and run on canonicalize IR $ opt -load lib/LLVMmypass.so -mypass vec-sum.preopt.ll On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > 2018-01-29 10:18 GMT-06:00 hameeza ahmed <hahmed2305 at gmail.com>: > > I tried writing

On 2016.03.08 13:13, BALATON Zoltan via Syslinux wrote: > For isohybrid > tech-savvy users are creating a bootable iso (from scratch or converting > an exiting non-hybrid iso) with all of their brain power available to > solve problems as they encounter it and (hopefully) understanding what > they are doing with non-tech savvy end users having nothing to do. Which doesn't mean

Sir, I want to apply mclapply() function for my analysis. So, I have to install multicore package. But I can not install the package. >install.packages("multicore") It gives that package multicore is not available. Can you help me? Regards, Suman Dhara [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Liu wrote: > It is so difficult ... > Which FE? It need BE support? I didn't get it. > > 2010/8/4 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Yeah OpenMP support. I read that it has a front end support but not the back end. So are there any projects or teams looking at this issue. > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Liu <proljc at

Hello All, In general when we use Rprof for performance evaluation on Multicore systems the output provides the time on the basis of the "user" time and the sampling time is equal to the the user time as reported by system.time. This does not seem right behavior when R is linked to BLAS/Lapack or other libraries which are optimized for parallel or multicore architectures as

Hello All, In general when we use Rprof for performance evaluation on Multicore systems the output provides the time on the basis of the "user" time and the sampling time is equal to the the user time as reported by system.time. This does not seem right behavior when R is linked to BLAS/Lapack or other libraries which are optimized for parallel or multicore architectures as

On a Unix machine I ran caret::rfe using the multicore package, and I saved the resulting object using save(lm2, file = "lm2.RData"). [Reproducible example below.] When I try to load("lm2.RData") on my Windows laptop, I get Error in loadNamespace(name) : there is no package called 'multicore' I completely understand the error and I would like to ignore it and

Multicore? You want OpenMP support? 2010/8/3 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Hi all, > I am new to this LLVM. I went through the documenation of LLVM but > I didn't find any support for Multicore. Is there any such possibility where > multicore architecture can be exploited using LLVM. > > > > Thanks > Vijay > >

It is so difficult ... Which FE? It need BE support? I didn't get it. 2010/8/4 vijay kumar <vijaygbvv at gmail.com> > Yeah OpenMP support. I read that it has a front end support but not the > back end. So are there any projects or teams looking at this issue. > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Liu <proljc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Multicore? >> You

Hi, I hope somebody can help me. I tried to run Java applications on other domains then domain0. Each time I retrieved the localhost, I got this message: The socket is marked as non-blocking operations would block. I used the J9 from IBM as JVM, but I tried several others. In addition, it''s none java problem. The program works fine on domain0. Now I would like to know

On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Roland Leißa <leissa at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I'm using gcc. My make command is > make -j9 > > as mentioned earlier, the -cc1 switch did the trick for me. Thanks for helping out. Aha. Yes, that'd do it. Glad you're up and debugging. -eric