similar to: Avoid loop with the integrate function

Hi, I am using the integrate function in some simulations in R (tried ver 2.12 and 2.15). The problem I have is that the last few rows do not integrate correctly. I have pasted the code I used. The column named "integral" shows the output from the integrate function. The last few rows have no integration results. I tried increasing the doses, number of subjects, etc.... this error occurs

I have data that looks like this: > df1 group id 1 red A 2 red B 3 red C 4 blue D 5 blue E 6 blue F I want a list of the groups containing vectors with the ids. I am avoiding subset(), as it is only recommended for interactive use. Here's what I have so far: df1 <- data.frame(group=c("red", "red", "red", "blue",

I can use stepAIC on an lme object in 1.6.2, but I get the following error if I try to do the same in 1.7.0: Error in lme(fixed = resp ~ cov1 + cov2, data = a, random = structure(list( : unused argument(s) (formula ...) Does anybody know why? Here's an example: library(nlme) library(MASS) a <- data.frame( resp=rnorm(250), cov1=rnorm(250), cov2=rnorm(250),

First, here is your message as it appears on R-help. On 10/14/2012 05:00 AM, r-help-request@r-project.org wrote: > I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with > respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and > another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the > following, I try to illustrate the two problems that

Hi, I was trying to overlay/combine two freqpoly plots. The sample code below illustrates the problem. Essentially, I want to do is: 1. Have the same colour for all the lines in 'Plot 1' (and 'Plot 2'). Currently, all the lines in Plot 1 have different colours and all the lines in Plot 2 have different colors. I'd like for all lines in Plot 1 to be 'red' and all the

Hello all! I have a problem that calls for a better understanding, than mine, of how lme() uses the random part of the call. The dataset consists of eleven field trials (Trial) with three replicates (Block) and four fertiliser treatments (Treat). Analysing for example yield with lme() is easy: m1 <- lme(Yield ~ Treat, data=data, random =~1| Trial/Block) giving estimates of

Hello ... I've noticed that some of our Bioconductor code was running drastically slower under current R-devel vs. current R-patched - one example is below using a ttest. I have the following snippet of code that demonstrates the problem while avoiding "real" code that takes an extremely long time to finish on R-devel: library(genefilter) data(eset) eset$cov1 z <-

Hi, I was trying to overlay/combine two freqpoly plots. The sample code below illustrates the problem. Essentially, I want to do is: 1. Have the same colour for all the lines in 'Plot 1' (and 'Plot 2'). Currently, all the lines in Plot 1 have different colours and all the lines in Plot 2 have different colors. I'd like for all lines in Plot 1 to be 'red' and all

the study design of the data I have to analyse is simple. There is 1 control group (CTRL) and 2 different treatment groups (TREAT_1 and TREAT_2). The data also includes 2 covariates COV1 and COV2. I have been asked to check if there is a linear or quadratic treatment effect in the data. I created a dummy data set to explain my situation: df1 <- data.frame( Observation =

Hi all I do not understand why I am getting the following error message. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks in advance. install.packages("cmprsk") library(cmprsk) result1 <-crr(ftime, fstatus, cov1, failcode=1, cencode=0 ) one.pout1 = predict(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) predict.crr(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) Error: could not find function

I have a fairly large model: > length(Y) [1] 3051 > dim(covariates) [1] 3051 211 All of these 211 covariates need to be nested hierarchically within a grouping "class", of which there are 8. I have an accessory vector, " cov2class" that specifies the mapping between covariates and the 8 classes. Now, I understand I can break all this information up into individual

Hello. Im hoping someone can help with a grouping question related to the "random=" statement within the nlme function. How do you specify that some grouping levels are inner to others? I tried several things, given below. Lets say I have a data frame with five variables, resp, cov1, ran1, ran2, group1, and group 2. The formula is resp~cov1 + ran1 + ran2, where the ran are random

Hello, I am a new R user and trying to learn how to implement the mahalanobis function to measure the distance between to 2 population centroids. I have used STATISTICA to calculate these differences, but was hoping to learn to do the analysis in R. I have implemented the code as below, but my results are very different from that of STATISTICA, and I believe I may not have interpreted the help

Dear r-helpers, I have a question about multiple testing. Here an example that puzzles me: All matrixes and contrast vectors are presented in treatment contrasts. 1. example: library(multcomp) n<-60; sigma<-20 # n = sample size per group # sigma standard deviation of the residuals cov1 <- matrix(c(3/4,-1/2,-1/2,-1/2,1,0,-1/2,0,1), nrow = 3, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE, dimnames =

On 10/4/2024 5:13 PM, Steven Yen wrote: > Pardon me!!! > > What makes you think this is a homework question? You are not > obligated to respond if the question is not intelligent enough for you. > > I did the following: two ways to calculate a covariance matrix but > wonder how I might replicate the results with "apply". I am not too > comfortable with the

> importance(rfor.pdp11_t25.comb1,type=1) %IncMSE v1 -0.28956401263 v2 1.92865561147 v3 -0.63443929130 v4 1.58949137047 v5 0.03190940065 I wasn't entirely confident with interpreting these results based on the documentation. Could you please interpret? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Pardon me!!! What makes you think this is a homework question? You are not obligated to respond if the question is not intelligent enough for you. I did the following: two ways to calculate a covariance matrix but wonder how I might replicate the results with "apply". I am not too comfortable with the online do of apply. > set.seed(122345671) > n<-3 > x<-rnorm(n); x

Even if this is not a homework question, it smells like one. If you read the Posting Guide it warns you that homework is off-topic, so when you impose an arbitrary constraint like "must use specific unrelated function" we feel like you are either cheating or wasting our time, and it is up to you to explain why we should follow you down this rabbit hole, keeping in mind that statistics

Hello, Is it possible to draw level lines on the surface of a bivariate function? In the following example, to draw surface and levels lines for a multivariate normal law, I use persp, trans3d, contourLines and lines, but if the lines are correctly drawn, some parts of them are, of course, visible even if they are drawn on a non visible "face". Any suggestion to avoid this problem

Hello, If you have a numeric matrix or data.frame, try something like cov(mtcars) Hope this helps, Rui Barradas ?s 10:15 de 04/10/2024, Steven Yen escreveu: > On 10/4/2024 5:13 PM, Steven Yen wrote: > >> Pardon me!!! >> >> What makes you think this is a homework question? You are not >> obligated to respond if the question is not intelligent enough for you.