similar to: Max number of PCIe cards

I was wondering if there is anyone following the list that has this or similar PCI cards running in a 1U server. If so, could you possibly recommend a PCI card bus adapter? I'm not sure exactly which kind I'll need. I plan on researching the different types of adapters I can purchase for my specific mobo (Supermicro X9SCA-F), but I'd like to not waste time by ordering an incorrect

On 10/17/2018 08:56 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 10:50 +0800, Han Han wrote: >> In libvirt, I found pcie-expander-bus controller doesn't support pcie-to-pci-bridge and pcie-switch-upstream-port. > [...] >> # virsh -k0 -K0 define /tmp/c.xml > Aside: the -k and -K virsh options are documented as > > -k | --keepalive-interval=NUM >

In libvirt, I found pcie-expander-bus controller doesn't support pcie-to-pci-bridge and pcie-switch-upstream-port. Version: libvirt-4.9 # cat /tmp/c.xml ... <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pcie-root'/> <controller type='pci' index='1' model='pcie-expander-bus'> <model name='pxb-pcie'/>

Dear all, I have a thirty-party PCIe card in my host which can work properly in native mode. I wonder if this card can be shared by multiple containers. As far as the network interface is concerned, too many efforts have been made for it. Two dedicated cgroup resource schedulers/subsystem(net_cls, net_prio) have been provided at the kernel level, and libvirt has also done a lot of work on

The datasheet is available at http://download.intel.com/design/network/datashts/82599_datasheet.pdf See 'Table 9.7. VF PCIe Configuration Space' of the datasheet, the PCI Express Capability Structure of the VF of Intel 82599 10GbE Controller looks trivial, e.g., the PCI Express Capabilities Register is 0, so the Capability Version is 0 and pt_pcie_size_init() would fail. We should not

Greetings all- I need to purchase a PCIe SATA or SAS controller(non-raid) for a Supermicro 2U system. It should be directly bootable. Any recommendations? The system will be running CentOS 5.4 as an LTSP system. Thanks! --Tim

Dear Daniel, The thirty-party PCIe card is based on the Xilinx’ FPGA which is off the shelf, the main features are as follows: 1) x8 Gen3, 8Gb/s per lane/direction 2) MSI and legacy interrupt support 3) Scatter-gather packet DMA engine provide by Northwest Logic We hope multiple Linux Containers to access the PCIe card in time division mode, for example, during slot 1, lxc1 read/write the PCIe

Hi Folks: I am oot able to add HP Intel 4Port PCIe to a linux hvm domain. HW is a HP DC7900. ErrorMessage: VmError: pci: to avoid potential security issue, 0000:22:00.0 is not allowed to be assigned to guest since it is behind PCIe switch that does not support or enable ACS. I also added in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp: pci-passthrough-strict-check no pci-dev-assign-strict-check no but no

Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/gk104.c | 8 ++++---- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/gp100.c | 10 ++++++++++ drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/priv.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/gk104.c

So, in the ongoing saga of the unusual 1U short-depth workstation, we have narrowed the field to two choices. Both entrants are configured with 16GB memory (4x4GB), two 2.5" drives (1x250GB SSD and 1x1TB HDD), and an NVIDIA NVS510 graphic card (quad display): 1) SuperMicro 5017R-MF, Xeon E5-2609 processor 2) SuperMicro 5017C-LF, Xeon E3-1220 processor (I wish SuperMicro had a list of their

everything was taken from nvgpu. Main reason for adding is to improve stability of the PCIe link changing code as we might want to depend on it for a workaround fixing our infamous runpm issues on recent laptops Karol Herbst (3): pci: force disable ASPM before changing the link speed pci/gk104: enable dl_mgr safe mode pci/gk104: wait for ltssm idle before changing the link

one rename and one enable patch. Tested on hardware and confirmed with traces Karol Herbst (2): pci: Rename g94 to g92 pci/g92: Enable changing pcie link speeds drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pci.h | 2 +- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/Kbuild | 2 +- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/{g94.c => g92.c} |

Checkout Beronet ISDN cards and Berofix Gateway (appliance or pci card) Personally for my last installation I chose Berofix card which is rock solid and reliable, yet easily configurable. With berofix you don't need telephony drivers on the host system, the isdn card is detected as a NIC and all configuration is done using a web interface. Then you configure FreePBX a new trunk to use the

On 11/15/2023 04:40, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Hi Mario, > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:07:53PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: >> USB4 routers support a feature called "PCIe tunneling". This >> allows PCIe traffic to be transmitted over USB4 fabric. >> >> PCIe root ports that are used in this fashion can be discovered >> by device specific data

Hello, I'm trying to migrate a working qemu command line configuration to libvirt. The part I'm currently failing on is: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -M Q35 ... -device vfio-pci,host=05:00.0,bus=pcie.0 The right way to translate this into libvirt XML seems to be using <hostdev>, but I seem to be unable to plug it into the pcie-root port This is how the interesting part looks like when

Hi Does Sangoma 8-port card A108 support PCIe version 2.0 ? The card is here http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a108.html And we want to use 3 such cards in this motherboard because it has 3 PCIe slots of version 2.0 http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/DX58SO/DX58SO-overview.htm Is this a good idea ? Do you have any experience

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 10:12:45PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > Apperantly things go south if we suspend the device with a different PCIE > link speed set than it got booted with. Fixes runtime suspend on my gp107. > > This all looks like some bug inside the pci subsystem and I would prefer a > fix there instead of nouveau, but maybe there is no real nice way of doing > that

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 21:33, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > Apperantly things go south if we suspend the device with a PCIe link speed > set to 2.5. Fixes runtime suspend on my gp107. > > This all looks like some bug inside the pci subsystem and I would prefer a > fix there instead of nouveau, but maybe there is no real nice way of doing > that outside

Following 7 patches are for PCIE AER (Advanced Error Reporting) support for XEN. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patches 1~4 back port from Linux Kernel which enables kernel support to AER. Those patches enable DOM0 PCIE error handling capability. When a device sends a PCIE error message to the root port, it will trigger an interrupt. The irq handler

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 18:07, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:01 AM Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 21:33, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Apperantly things go south if we suspend the device with a PCIe link speed > > > set to 2.5.