similar to: Outlook (2010) -> Dovecot (IMAP) >10x slower with high network load and many folders

Hi, The program below work very well. (snps = c('rs621782_G', 'rs8087639_G', 'rs8094221_T', 'rs7227515_A', 'rs537202_C')) Selec = todos[ , colnames(todos) %in% snps] head(Selec) But, I have a data set with 1.000 columns and I need extract 70 to use (like snps in command above). This 70 snps are in a file. So I create a file to extract them with

Hi list, I have been reading MAN pages and listarchives, but not found the answer to my question though I am sure it must be possible to acheive my wish. I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a limited period of time, EG two weeks. I have not yet been able to figure out how to do this inside rsync (while the backup is being performed) and my understanding of the

Hi List, I am very close to migrating from Cyrus to Dovecot (to be more precise from Mac OS X Server 10.5.8 to 10.6.4). The latter is reporting the dovecotd version to be 1.1.20apple0.5. All I have read about dovecot is extremely positive so I am exited to make the switch. BACKUP: BUT I would like to be sure that I can make a sound backup strategy. For Cyrus i used topicdesk's mailbfr (a

I''m using ActiveScaffold. In the file house_helper.rb I have written the code: def house_form_column(record, input_name) ... list = House.find(:all, :include => ''city'') new_list=... ... list do |element| if record = element.name selec=element.id end end select_tag ''X'',options_for_select(new_list, selected=selec),

dear list, I have read a spss file with read.spss() now I have a list with all my variable stored as vectors. is it possible to selec cases based on the value of one or more variables? thank you, Simone

Hi List, I have (otherwise successfull) migrated a server from cyrus to dovecot (Mac OS X Server 10.5.8 to 10.6.4 [dovecotd version to be 1.1.20apple0.5]). There are ca. 300+ users of which a very small handfull (ca. 1 %) are having reported a usage size that is very different to what 'du' reports. How can I rebuild the maildirsize and why might it be wrong in the first place(?) Will the

Hello, I am building an Rails applications that has to integrate an legacy system (lxoffice) (schema at: http://www.lx-office.org/uploads/media/DB_Schema_2.1.1_R_393_17_03_2005_.pdf). They somehow use global ids (global for some tables). I can not change the schema and still I want to use Rails to access it and not pure SQL. When I try to insert a record I get the following message:

I have an odd setup at present, because I''m testing while still building my machine. It''s an Intel Atom D510 mobo running snv_134 2GB RAM with 2 SATA drives (AHCI): 1: Samsung 250GB old laptop drive 2: WD Green 1.5TB drive (idle3 turned off) Ultimately, it will be a time machine backup for my Mac laptop. So I have installed Netatalk 2.1.1 which is working great. Read

Hi. I'm using Debian. Is this a Redhat-only list, or is it only hosted by RedHat? I recently changed my filing systems over to ext3, but deliberately left the forced boot check parameters alone so my system checks after 20 mounts. I notice that the fsck takes a good ten times longer than under ext2, to perform the cleanly unmounted check. (On the occasion where I did unmount dirtily, the

Full_Name: Rick Stahlhut Version: 2.9.1 OS: os x 10.5.7 Submission from: (NULL) (128.151.71.23) I upgraded to 2.9.1 today from 2.9.0. I work with large CDC (center for disease control) datasets and start, frequently, with a series of 23 large-ish merges to create the final dataset I work on. I do this each time because (a) R is fast. why not? and b) the datasets occasionally get updated by

OK, I have made a little search about this "problem" that apparently occurs only on Windows platform... (but I am sure most of you are already aware of it): the slow down is due to the adoption of a different algorithm for pow in mingw 3.x. This is motivated by some other changes in mingw. Here is a quote of Danny Smith that did this change: >When mingw changed default FPU settings

The move to memcached_client 1.6.5 in Rails 2.3 seems to have made the Rails cache about 10x slower. Since that''s the opposite effect I would expect, I was hoping somebody would explain where I''m misreading these numbers? I noticed my fragment caching was slow -- it shouldn''t take 2ms just to read a 2k string from a localhost memcached server: Cached fragment hit:

Buenas. A ver si a alguien se le ocurre cómo hacer este filtrado. Quiero seleccionar para cada GRUPO el numero de ORDEN más pequeño (que podría ser con wich.min(ORDEN)), pero sin que se repita la CLASE, de modo que si la CLASE-01 salió en el primer GRUPO ya no salga más.  GRUPO           ORDEN    CLASE        A       1   CLASE-01        A       2   CLASE-02        A       5   CLASE-03        B

Han-Lin I don't think I have seen a reply so I will suggest that maybe you could try a different approach than what you are thinking about doing. I believe the current best practice is to use the weights as a covariate in a regression model - and bytheway - the weights are the inverse of the probabilities of selection - not the probabilities. Fundamentally, there is a difficulty in making

yop, http://rubyonrails.org/api/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormHelper.html ici j''ai vu qu''on pouvait g?n?rer des ?l?ment d''un formulaire gr?ce des m?thodes. Apres quelque petite recherches j''ai trouv? comment g?n?rer un select <%= select(''category'', ''category.id'', Category.find_all.collect {|category| category.nom})

guys, 1)i made a mistake in my post. the said TF node was created when Selected() was called in ADDC node. 2) the source code under test short a,b; void test() { a+=b; } 3)the DAG after ADDC was seleced: Select node: 0x4977a20: ch,glue = <<Unknown Machine Node #65419>> 0x4972bd0, 0x49731d0, 0x4976c20, 0x49730d0<Mem:LD1[@a](align=2)> Result node: 0x4977a20: ch,glue =

Hi, I am seeing that doc = index[''mykey''] index.update ''mykey'', doc is about 10 times slower than doc = Document.new doc[''id''] = ''mykey'' index << doc It looks like #update is _much_ slower that #<<. Is it as expected? Sergei. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

We have some code that uses REXML, that when executed outside of Rails as a standalone rb file, runs fine. Once we run the code inside of Rails, it is dog slow. I know REXML is slow, buggy, sucks, etc., but my question is what cause the performance to degrade like that. Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Is Samba typically slower sending files than receiving? I have seen this both at home and at work. Sometimes the throughput is 1/2 when I copy files from Samba than when I copy to Samba (From WinNT and Win95/98) The Players -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have been playing with the options for three days. I have an NT server that is old.

hi folks, we had a nice old compaq Prosignia300 server - Pentium75 but nice architecture. It won't serve as a workstation but from what I read of linux and samba it should have done very well as a server on our win95 network. However, after setting all the win95 boxes up with tcp/ip to see the samba server, and copying all our medical databases across, we found that the response time