similar to: [PATCH 0/2] Fix btrfs blocksize and bind mkfs.btrfs (RHBZ#807905).

Hi Rich, A compiling error occurs here, File "../ocaml/guestfs.ml", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: The implementation ../ocaml/guestfs.ml does not match the interface ../ocaml/guestfs.cmi: Values do not match: external mkfs_btrfs : t -> ?allocstart:int64 -> ?bytecount:int64 -> ?datatype:string ->

The changes since the previous patch: - safe ADD_ARG macro for adding arguments to a fixed size stack array - support for testing functions that return RHashtable, ie. tune2fs-l. - add tests that set (tune2fs) and get (tune2fs-l) various parameters. - only one 'intervalbetweenchecks' parameter (in seconds) Rich.

Hi, Question is pretty simple: "How to change node size and leaf size on previously created partition?" Now, I know what most people will say: "you should''ve be smarter while typing mkfs.btrfs". Well, I''m intending to convert in place ext4 partition but there seems to be no option for leaf and node size in this tool. If it''s not possible I guess

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel

Since 2.6.29-rc1 contains btrfs I had to try it. However the loopback mount of my btrfs formatted file fails: user@host:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=btrfs.img bs=1MB count=512 user@host:~$ mkfs.btrfs btrfs.img fs created label (null) on btrfs.img nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 488.28MB Btrfs v0.16+da35ab2b0b54 user@host:~$ sudo mount -t btrfs -o loop btrfs.img /mnt/btrfs mount:

Check for the return value of ''open_ctree()'' before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com> --- btrfs-image.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index f2bbcc8..2a33a55 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out,

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply

This simple patch adds support for the BSD "growfs" command, so you can grow BSD filesystems [in theory -- see below]. It also adds a new optional group called "ufsutils" which indicates if the libguestfs API supports the guestfs_ufs_growfs call, since it's not available on Fedora. (http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#availability) I tested this on Debian, and although

Currently, the following commands succeed. # cat /proc/swaps Filename Type Size Used Priority /dev/sda3 partition 8388604 0 -1 /dev/sdc8 partition 9765884 0 -2 # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc8 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see

These assorted patches end up with adding virtio-scsi support to libguestfs. It passes libguestfs-test-tool, but I haven't yet tried to run the full set of tests. In theory > 26 devices can be added, but it's likely that certain parts of the daemon will break if you actually try this. This of course needs to be fixed. Thanks Paolo Bonzini for invaluable help. Rich.

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

These patches fix btrfs on aarch64. You still need btrfs-progs 4.4 which was only released a few days ago. Rich.

[Note I'm not bothering with 32 bit ppc any more since it is effectively obsolete.] Libguestfs now works on ppc64 using the 'direct' backend. You will need: - libguestfs 1.23.21 + 7f90aa0998 - supermin 4.1.x (only tested with supermin-4.1.5-2.fc21.ppc64, but earlier versions should work) - qemu-system-ppc64 compiled from git (qemu 1.4 & 1.6 known to be broken) -

More comprehensive support for virtio-scsi. Passes all the tests. Rich.

An experimental series that adds support for rsync. Rich.

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs

Hi, I''ve some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes. I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the decrypted fs is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in my script. Thanks for any help! Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

Fix and/or document issues raised in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-February/msg00010.html Rich.

Part 2 fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842440 Actually this fix on its own should be sufficient, but probably we want the nbdkit fixes too. Note this uses actual OCaml 4.05 features! ("let open" and the Unix.tcgetattr functions). I checked that both features are available on RHEL 7's OCaml. Rich.