similar to: Wine CPU trouble

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a 6.3 guest running on a 6.3 host and the output from top seems strange to me. At least I did not expect this. While in the guest on core is busy with i/o the host seems idle. Does anyone know why it is this way? See the output from top below, first the one from guest, then host. top - 14:12:35 up 12 min, 1 user, load average: 2.76,

Ran into something tonight I've not seen before. The system has been up for 20 days, and has not missed a beat of any sorts, even when getting beat on at a decent level. What my concern is, tonight I attempted to log out so X would restart, and from the looks of all the stuff on the screen (which never did reload gdm) was chock full of statements where swap had been exhausted, and processes

Hi all, I just installed centos 5.4 xen-kernel on intel core i5 machine as dom0. After some hours of syncing a raid10 array (8 sata disk) I noticed a steadily increasing loadavg. I think without reasonable i/o wait or cpu utilization the loadavg on this system should be very lower. If this loadavg is normal I would be greatful if somone could explain why. The screenshots below show that there is

libvirt_lxc causes cpu 100% usage? libvirt version : 1.1.1 I don't know what happend, any help would be appreciated. thx top - 07:39:44 up 1 day, 2:13, 2 users, load average: 4.72, 4.59, 4.51 Tasks: 243 total, 4 running, 239 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu0 : 33.1 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 64.6 id, 0.7 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st %Cpu1 : 41.1 us, 3.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 55.3 id, 0.7

Dear group I had a R ? program that was to slow, I mad it multi core prog..to speed up, its a simulation when the runs are 100 its very fast..raising the runs to 10k mad it in the first fast then it slow down I checked the HW usafe and here is the top command results %Cpu0 ?:100.0 us, ?0.0 sy, ?0.0 ni, ?0.0 id, ?0.0 wa, ?0.0 hi, ?0.0 si, ?0.0 st %Cpu1 ?:100.0 us, ?0.0 sy, ?0.0 ni, ?0.0 id, ?0.0

Hai all, need help please, I have samba server with version samba-3.2.6-1, authenticate to samba PDC. I have spent 1 week to find the problem, all users which access to samba server move very..very slow,? i have try to change SO_RCVBUF from 8192 to 4096 but there's no effect at all, so i turned it back to 8192, try to edit smb.conf for loging to just rename,unlink,rmdir,pwrite and open. but

Hi all, At the pre-big thanks to the SAMBA team for many years the great work. Sorry for my english. A week ago, have implemented productively Samba 4.1.5 on CentOS 6.5. I installed samba by default dns server built-in (internal) with the rfc2307. Everything works great, but after a while I noticed that the memory on my server is largely occupied. At this time there are about 10 users domain -

Hi, i have a vm which has a poor performance. E.g. top needs seconds to refresh its output on the console. Same with netstat. The guest is hosting a MySQL DB with a webfrontend, its response is poor too. I'm looking for the culprit. Following top in the guest i get these hints: Memory is free enough, system is not swapping. System has 8GB RAM and two cpu's. Cpu 0 is struggling with a

hi all, below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU utilization. my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user utilization, when there are just these 8 processes saying they're using 25% of a CPU each, and no other processes showing up taking any resources? i have run this test on other machines and they act as expected. i found this b/c this

Hi there, I have a multi DC global setup. 9 x Ubuntu 14.04.3 DC's in multiple Sites. This has been working nicely for some time however recently the FSMO holder has been refusing LDAP requests on occasions and showing constant very high CPU usage: top - 08:59:12 up 8:51, 1 user, load average: 1.03, 1.00, 1.03 Tasks: 186 total, 4 running, 182 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu0 :

Am 2015-09-17 09:29, schrieb Pasi K?rkk?inen: > > Are you using nfs over UDP or TCP ? > TCP, but Network cant be the bottleneck, have tested it with iperf between bare metal/domU's and the nfs domU and it was perfectly fast... > > I don't think. > > > If you used NFS over UDP, try running it over TCP. no I use it over TCP... > > What does

On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my own setup either. For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. Writes to the gluster FS from within one of the gluster participating bricks:

Hello, I have run into some performance issues after adding bricks to a 3.3.1 volume. Basically I am seeing very high CPU usage and extremely degraded performance. I started a re-balance but stopped it after a couple days. The logs have a lot of entries for split-brain as well as "Non Blocking entrylks failed for". For some of the directories on the client doing an ls will show multiple

On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage >> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying

Hello list, how could this happen? The Server doesn't respond from time to time with a high load avarage. We found a suspicious smbd process: top - 13:43:07 up 1 day, 2:27, 5 users, load average: 32.49, 58.41, 37.95 Tasks: 1196 total, 5 running, 1190 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu0 : 14.7% us, 3.8% sy, 0.0% ni, 79.8% id, 1.3% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.3% si Cpu1 : 1.3% us, 84.6%

Hello, I have a server pfsense in bridge mode to function as transparent FW, the problem is that once I connect the pfsense between my router core and my core switch catalyst a few seconds begin to appear several messages like these: em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting And the connection falls

Hi Team Can someone advice me on how i can lower the load average on my asterisk server? dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2 libpri-1.4.10.1 asterisk-1.4.25.1 2 X TE412P Digium cards on ISDN PRI Im using the system as an IVR without any transcoding or bridging ************************************** top - 10:27:57 up 199 days, 5:18, 2 users, load average: 67.75, 62.55, 55.75 Tasks: 149

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> >>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >>> own setup either. For the writes

Hello Got strange problem with high system "%system load" and very slow user level programs (apache+php+mysql) behavior gstat shows 1.5-4% hard disk busy load but system shows about 20-30% load while user load is max 5%. vmstat shows from 2 to 35 process in "b" state. Now use 7.0-RELEASE-p5 , but the same problem was with 7.0-RELEASE. And have no idea what to do with this.

Dear Jatin, Maybe it’s a good idea first to implement Spice: <video> <model type='qxl' ram='65536' vram='65536' heads='1'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/> </video>