similar to: LSI 2008 SAS driver?

I have some Asterisk boxes in my SIP provider's colo, and the SIP connections are done without using any kind of authentication credentials. It's a secure network, so I guess that's OK. I now want different sets of calls from one box billed to different customers, by the providers billing system, and the provider says that the distinction can only be made by having the differnet sets

In article <CAGkb5vfXkJcbpQWupuZG0xp8_gTgv+55+YrZf8VdF0maiO9UfQ at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> >

In article <1485342377.3072.6.camel at biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:14 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > So, it installed happily. > > > > Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and > > grub2-install. > > > > Um, nope. I edited the device map from

I'm in the process of specifying the hardware for some new Asterisk systems which will be running a substantial number of conferences with recording. I was wondering what there is to choose between SCSI, SAS and SATA disks, in terms of performance for this kind of application. I will be using dual drives with kernel-based software RAID1. Any advice from experience would be appreciated!

In article <1485416344.2047.1.camel at biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > If you are using RAID 1 kernel mirroring, you can do that with /boot too, > > and Grub finds the kernel just fine. I've done it many times: > > > > > Hmm, OK. I wonder why anaconda doesn't do it then. > > Reading various

In article <CAGkb5vexU7eoU=-ASF_uPN_PA68QQi2RU0HdPhozZEYDE0VqEg at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > This is especially important if you use anything from EPEL as EPEL5 will be > removed when RHEL goes EOL. You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would seem rather irresponsible... Cheers Tony -- Tony

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

I'm just setting up a SuperMicro system which has twin SATA disks on an Intel IHC7 RAID-capable controller. The system came with Fedora 5 pre-installed, which I will be removing and replacing with CentOS 4.5. But before doing so, I've been having a look at how the original vendor configured it. When I've built systems previously, I've disabled any RAID controller and used kernel

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3g at mail.gmail.com>, Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to mirror the centos.org repository for an offline network. I > don't need the ISO images, don't need any i386 stuff, and I think I > probably don't need any of the source code rpms either.

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was

I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E controller. I've googled all over the place and found a few different drivers for RHEL5 for it.. and tried a few of them.. Some will load, some complain that this isn't the correct version.. non of them work when it comes to showing Hard Drivers in the partition manager. The machine is a Supermicro SYS-6015V-M3

Dear all, actually I installed CentOS 5.4 x86_64 on 11 new Dell R710 servers. It is required to use 5.4 to be covered by the NetApp Interoperability Matrix for use of Snapdrive. All systems spit out the error message mpt2sas0: failure at drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c:4637/_scsih_add_device()! at boot time. In dmesg the complete SCSI initialization logging appears as follows: SCSI

Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love