Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Prelink: Something's happening here"
2017 Aug 30
4
rkhunter and prelink
Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ]
All file hash checks will be skipped because:
This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not
look like SHA1 or MD5.
Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run
rkhunter --propupd.
Works. And then,
2017 Aug 30
2
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
> This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
>
> HASH_CMD=sha1sum
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
>
>> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
>> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning
2017 Aug 30
1
rkhunter and prelink
in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu>
wrote:
> This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
>
> HASH_CMD=sha1sum
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
>
>> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting
2012 Sep 28
1
Prelink failure
I have a number of CentOS6 machines, and on one of them, the daily prelink
cron job aborts. Any ideas what to look for?
/etc/cron.daily/prelink:
/etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 9381 Aborted (core dumped) /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS >> /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 2>&1
I'm unfamiliar with prelink, so I'm not sure what to look for in the logs.
2007 Jan 02
1
disabling prelink?
What are the pros and cons of disabling prelinking in CentOS 4?
From what I understand, prelinking is ment to be performance
improvement (faster loading time for binaries). I can see some
potential benefit on workstations where many different processes are
started frequently. But how big is that benefit in real life? Would
I slow down things noticably if there is no prelinking?
Is
2005 Jun 16
3
turning off prelinking?
In short, the reason considering (and still only considering) turning it off is
to make tripwire usable again (security vs. performance, I guess).
Is it possible to completely turn it off system-wide? Any additional steps
needed on the existing system (that already have half of the binaries
prelinked)?
What order of performance degradation to expect? If it is minor, nobody is
going to cry
2005 Mar 21
3
Can't run program; exec-shield or prelink active?
I have a large installer program (~400MB) that fails to run under wine
(20050310). It gives me the following:
err:virtual:map_image Image was mapped at 0x60640000: standard load address
for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available
err:virtual:map_image Do you have exec-shield or prelink active?
wine: could not load L"C:\\WebPACK_71_fcfull_i.exe" as Win32 binary
The thing is that I
2010 Jun 30
1
prelink
The above discussion of prelink gave me pause for thought...
I have a "suite" of programs that I install in their own directory,
along with their datafiles, under /opt.
Would it be a good idea to add that directory to /etc/prelink.conf?
What could go wrong?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
2015 Jun 18
2
NUX Skype for Linux
So, what does this do?
# cat /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf
-b /usr/bin/skype
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax:
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
> > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
> >
> > HASH_CMD=sha1sum
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> >
> > > Can't remember if I posted this before...
2010 Sep 12
4
Problem installing from source, 1.3.2 "..prelink not found"
Hi all!
Trying to get magic workstation (www.magicworkstation.com) to run correctly. My distro (BT4R1) comes with an older version of wine, so I uninstalled it then installed Wine Stable 1.2. Compiled it manually, got it everything it needed save one thing from the ./configure and it seemed to install fine, but it did not fix my problem. There are still some game breaking graphical isssues with
2007 Jul 11
1
RPM Build Question
Hi People,
I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and
generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS
for some commercial software that we have purchased.
Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer
ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in
/usr/local.
Step 2 was create a tar file of the
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
HASH_CMD=sha1sum
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ]
> All file hash checks will be skipped because:
> This system uses
2007 Jan 22
5
Problem with xen on Centos-4.4?
I am running a Xen installation on a Centos-4.4 based test box, my desktop
unit, and I am having intermittent problems installing certain pieces of
software. Some time back I posted to this list regarding my inability to
install Adobe Acrobat on this unit and was advised to essentially
repackage the software and try again. This is beyond my present means of
knowledge or time to acquire same and
2008 Oct 13
3
console output
Hi All,
Does anyone knows what doest this output means?
[root@serverxen ~]# xm list
Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 3202 8 r----- 5220.1
vm1 3 4095 2 -b---- 3529.2
vm2 5 8191 4 -b---- 399.0
[root@serverxen ~]# xm
2006 Feb 06
0
Persistant prelinking/exec-shield issue - please help. =/
Greetings,
I'm experiencing in issue with the latest Wine on Fedora Core 4, latest
kernel and all latest drivers available.
I'm attempting to run World of Warcraft, after compiling a custom build of
wine, with instructions outlined at
http://wiki.kaspersandberg.com/doku.php?id=howtos:wine:worldofwarcraft
Everything compiles fine, and I'm able to run wine to generat the
2013 Aug 19
0
CEBA-2013:1167 CentOS 6 prelink Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1167
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1167.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
37e0c1897102ba0f909b7848ea03c12d64896c1aa8df810ce18476c5115d7aae prelink-0.4.6-3.1.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2006 Sep 13
5
Re: strange mtime/md5sum behaviour and constantly changing files with links
On Sep 8, 2006, at 5:58 AM, Thorsten Sandfuchs wrote:
> hio,
> as I have some huge files to distribute and md5-sum-checking takes
> SOME time
> for them, I''m trying to switch to mtime/timestamps, but got no
> luck. Regularly
> the mtime seems to change and additionally the md5sums generate
> themselves
> anyway.
I''m pretty sure that the file
2004 Oct 21
0
Need help with prelink and exec-shield
Hi,
I was using Inno Setup 4 (http://www.jrsoftware.org/) under wine to
create a win32 installer. Apart from some minor locale related issues,
everything worked fine. But when I tried to change the icon image of the
installer (by uncommenting line 17 of test.iss in the attached example),
I got the following error message:
err:virtual:map_image Image was mapped at 0x76360000: standard load
2008 Aug 19
3
How Can I Tell How Dovecot Was Installed?
I'm trying to help someone with Dovecot, and it looks like this one is
a few versions behind.
They say that they're not sure if it was installed Via an RPM or a
source tarball. Dovecot is use MySQL.
This is a RHEL5 server. There are RPMs listed as installed (rpm -qa)
but I don't know how I can tell what was used to install the currently
used set up. (also asking on the Postifix list)