similar to: Wish To Join Xapian:-)

Hello everyone... We were trying to implement the Newton-Raphson method in R, and estimate the parameters a and b, of a function, F, however we can't seem to implement this the right way. Hope you can show me the right way to do this. I think what we want R to do is to read the data from the website and then peform maxNR on the function, F. Btw the version of R being used is "RGui for

Hi all, I've managed to get JAGS working on my Ubuntu Hardy Linux with a 32-bit computer and AMD processors using R 2.8.1. JAGS is great. I've read that JAGS is the fastest, but that hasn't been my experience. At any rate, I have more experience with WinBUGS under Windows and would like a version of that working as well. It seems like I've read a lot on the subject and tried a

Hello, We are using the equipment "MUSTEK PowerMust 3000 NetGuard RM". That is using Megatec protocol. But unfortunately not all the data can be viewed correctly when dumping from utility "upsc". For example: upsbox# upsc mustek at localhost battery.voltage: 108.00 battery.voltage.nominal: 96.0 driver.name: megatec driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port:

Dear Mentors, I am trying to apply for the weighting scheme project and I've submitted a proposal according to the template few days ago. I think the proposal is still not good enough, can you help give some suggestions on what else shall I do more research on&include in the proposal? Thanks a lot! -- Best Regards, Shaohuan Li -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

For what it's worth: running R CMD check on a package when the outdir has parentheses in the pathname fails with the following error: * checking PDF version of manual ...sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. * checking PDF version of manual without hyperrefs or index ...sh: Syntax error: "("

Hi everyone, I followed up with some folks at Google about how we wanted to be involved in this group and we decided that Matthew Riley (mattdr at google.com) would be the right person to be involved here. Sorry about the confusion. I'd like to withdraw my request. Thanks again to everyone involved! I'm glad to see this becoming a part of how LLVM works. :) Zola Bridges On Wed, Jun

Thanks Zola, I’d rather have point-contact people, instead of having mailing lists. I have a few goals with this: Listing particular people makes it clear who’s on the hook from your organization These people can still communicate internally, but are responsible to ensure that the internal folks know what the LLVM process and disclosure restrictions are Listing a limited number of specific people