similar to: MA process in panels

Dear Philipp, this is just a tentative answer because debugging is really not possible without a reproducible example (or, at a very bare minimum, the output from traceback()). Anyway, thank you for reporting this interesting numerical issue; I'll try to replicate some similar behaviour on a similarly dimensioned artificial dataset when I have some time (which might not be soon). As for now,

Dear users, I am trying to show the equation (including coefficients from the model estimates) for a gam model but do not understand how to. Slide 7 from one of the authors presentations (gam-theory.pdf URL: http://people.bath.ac.uk/sw283/mgcv/) shows a general equation log{E(yi )} = ?+ ?xi + f (zi ) . What I would like to do is put my model coefficients and present the equation used. I am an

I want to estimate the following fixed effect model: y_i,t = alpha_i + beta_1 x1_t + beta_2 x2_i,tx2_i,t = gamma_i + gamma_1 x1_t + gamma_2 Z1_i + gamma_3 Z2_i I can use ivreg from AER to do the iv regression. fm <- ivreg(y_i,t ~ x1_t + x2_i,t | x1_t + Z1_i + Z2_i, data = DataSet) But, I'm not sure how can I add the fixed effects. Thanks! [[alternative HTML

Taking the Grunfeld data, which is built-in in R, for example, (1)How can I construct a dataset (or dataframe) that consists of the data of all firms in 1951? (2)How can I calculate the average capital in each form over the period 1951-1954? What I can imagine is to categorize the data by firm, and then select the data between 1951 and 1954 for each firm, but how can I do it? Thanks, Miao

Hi list, has anyone succeeded in using pgmm() on any dataset besides Arellano/Bond's EmplUK, as shown in the vignette? Whatever I try, I eventually get a runtime error because of a singular matrix at various points in pgmm.diff() (which gets called by pgmm()). For example, when estimating a "dynamic" version of the Grunfeld data: data(Grunfeld, package="Ecdat") grun

Dear List, I am using the output of a ML estimation on a random effects model with first-order autocorrelation to make a further conditional test. My model is much like this (which reproduces the method on the famous Grunfeld data, for the econometricians out there it is Table 5.2 in Baltagi): library(Ecdat) library(nlme) data(Grunfeld)

I am working with panel data. I am using the plm package to do this. I would like to do be able to adjust for autocorrelation, as one does with glm models and correlation structures (eg corr=corARMA(q=4)) . In particular, I want to employ MA(4) error structure. Is there a way of doing this with the plm package? (Note: I do not really want to use the pggls function for various

Dear R users I get different F-statistic results for a "within" model, when using "time" or "twoways" effects in plm() [1] and when manually specifying the time control dummies [2]. [1] vignette("plm") [2] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Farnsworth-EconometricsInR.pdf Two examples below: library("AER") data("Grunfeld", package =

Hi everyone and thank you for the help you could give me. My data is in a spreadsheet. The 1st column identifies the firm (with the fiscal number), the columns 2 to 11 have the variable value for 11 years. I have many variables (files like this). Each file has about 40.000 firms (rows). I transformed all the files in txt files. The data is a panel data, like this: firm revenu2007 revenue2006

Dear all I am trying to fit Variable Coefficients Models on Unbalanced Panel Data. I managed to fit such models on balanced panel data (the example from the "plm" vignette), but I failed to do so on my real, unbalanced panel data. I can reproduce the error on a modified example from the vignette: > require(plm) > data("Hedonic") > Hed <- pvcm(mv ~ crim + zn + indus

Greetings all The help file for GAMM in mgcv indicates that the log likelihood for a GAMM reported using summary(my.gamm$lme) (as an example) is not correct. However, in a past R-help post (included below), there is some indication that the likelihood ratio test in anova.lme(mygamm$lme, mygamm1$lme) is valid. How can I tell if anova.lme results are meaningful (are AIC, BIC, and logLik

I was wondering if anyone had some sample time series dgp code. I am particularly interested in examples of autoregressive processes and error correction model DGPs. I have attached a more specific example of what I mean. I have tried myself but would hoping someone had some more elegant code that would help me extend my own code. Thanks Luke Keele UNC-Chapel Hill Nuffield College, Oxford

I have an unexpected result with the functions lag() and diff() in the plm (panel data) package when used with transform(). These plm-specific functions are supposed to generate lags and first differences within each panel. lag() does not work properly the first time (it reproduces the same series--this is a common time series pitfall), BUT then it does work properly when it is run a second

Dear R users, I wish to manually demean a panel over time and entities. I tried to code the Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989) transformation (from Baltagi's book Ch. 9). As a benchmark I use both the pmodel.response() and model.matrix() functions in package plm and the results from using dummy variables. As far as I understood the transformation (Ch.3), Q%*%y (with y being the dependent variable)

I didn't see you got an answer posted to this question: You can't modify a pdata.frame object. Your transforms turn it back to a normal data frame and diff and lag won't work as expected. Try: Grunfeld.p <- pdata.frame(Grunfeld,c("firm","year")) tmp <- transform(Grunfeld.p, d.value = diff(Grunfeld.p$value,1)) tmp <- cbind(tmp, l.value =

Dear R users What would be the best way to approach estimating a panel regression with twoways random effects, on unbalanced data? Unfortunately, the "plm" package has no implementation of twoways random effects for unbalanced data. Currently I'm considering two approaches: - extend "plm" to cover this type of panel regression. (For the authors, cc'ed:) Would

Hello, First, sorry for my poor english, I will try to be understood. It's the first time I try this "r-help mailing list" and I hope it will be a success. I am working on heteroscedasticity analysis. I would like to get the "Box-Ljung" and the "Lagrange multipliers" test. I found the first one in the library "ts", but I can't find the second one.

Perhaps I am making this too hard, but how does one regress y(t) on a constant, x(t-1) and y(t-1)? I've tried the manuals and until I get Dalgaard's book (just ordered on Amazon), I am stuck! Thanks to all in advance for your patience and consideration.

Hello Cecilia, nice hearing from you again. I must restate a couple of my old hints, though ;^) 1) please always put the authors c/c, as we are not guaranteed to browse through the r-help every day 2) please provide reproducible examples. As example(pooltest) keeps working fine, as do some other cases I tried (Grunfeld data etc.), I don't know what the problem is but evidently your data are

Dear Ivo, dear list, (see: Message: 70 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:39:19 +0000 From: ivowel at gmail.com Subject: [R] pgmm (Blundell-Bond) sample needed) I think I finally figured out how to replicate your supersimple GMM example with pgmm() so as to get the very same results as Stata. Having no other regressors in the formula initially drove me crazy. This was a case where simpler models are